Jump to content

How Hot is Ukraine Gonna Get?


Probus

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, CHEqTRO said:

Nah, the intention of taking quickly Kyiv is to have some pro russian politician sign a capitulation agreement and have some legitimacy. It seems that Western Ukraine its going to be left "independent" (That would depend of how the push on Kyiv goes of course). If anything it shows a bit of deseperation. There is no indication that the Ukranian army will stop fighting in case of the fall of its capital. The Ukranian high command will keep operating from Lviv. On the contrary, taking the eastern parts of their country in a quick manner would have mean the encirclement and anhilation of Ukranian forces there, plus a big loss to the economy potential of Ukraine, even if Kyiv holds, probably forcing the Ukranian goverment to accept peace. Right now the attack on Kharkiv is as relevant strategically to the russians as the attack towards Kyiv

...

Also, about the celebration of downed airplanes, its important to remember that Russia has not the economy to replenish quickly modern equipment. Any losses they suffer to their arsenal are important in the long term. Also, it shows that both the Ukranian air force and its air defenses are still operative, which a lot of people thought, me included, that they were going to be destroyed on the first day of the offensive, but there they are. Also russian casualties are definitively higher than 500 ( counting KIA, WIA and MIA)

Well, I'm not going to say that there aren't arguments for alternative concepts of operation, just that the current flow of events is best explained by the Russians having a "Decapitation by Going to the Capital" strategy. As for whether it's the best call ... well, there's a lot of argumentation that the Germans should have made a concentrated lunge on Moscow rather than diverting towards Ukraine.

As for Russian casualties, they are substantial and it's harder to replace equipment than even back in the Cold War, but so far I've heard of nothing that justifies the cheering. Russia never had the benefit of a war that was as cheap (in friendly lives) as Gulf War I. On the other hand, it also means it has no expectations of a cheap war - if Russia decides on war, it means its senior leadership is prepared to take some losses (whether they are easy to replace or not), especially since Ukraine isn't Iraq or even Georgia - by Russian standards they are reasonably trained and equipped, and there can be no delusions the Russians will just steamroller them. And they are losing a plane here or there, a platoon or company gets ambushed ... I'm seeing nothing that is likely to cause their senior leadership to go "Eek! We are being WIPED. We didn't plan to take nearly that many losses." At most this is their Worst case, or even their Middle case projection. So I just don't see them stopping their operation for this kind of casualty rate.

====

Finally, a bit of un-necessary cruelty:

 

Edited by arkhangelsk2021
Because this has to be preserved.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, arkhangelsk2021 said:

Well, I'm not going to say that there aren't arguments for alternative concepts of operation, just that the current flow of events is best explained by the Russians having a "Decapitation by Going to the Capital" strategy. As for whether it's the best call ... well, there's a lot of argumentation that the Germans should have made a concentrated lunge on Moscow rather than diverting towards Ukraine.

As for Russian casualties, they are substantial and it's harder to replace equipment than even back in the Cold War, but so far I've heard of nothing that justifies the cheering. Russia never had the benefit of a war that was as cheap (in friendly lives) as Gulf War I. On the other hand, it also means it has no expectations of a cheap war - if Russia decides on war, it means its senior leadership is prepared to take some losses (whether they are easy to replace or not), especially since Ukraine isn't Iraq or even Georgia - by Russian standards they are reasonably trained and equipped, and there can be no delusions the Russians will just steamroller them. And they are losing a plane here or there, a platoon or company gets ambushed ... I'm seeing nothing that is likely to cause their senior leadership to go "Eek! We are being WIPED. We didn't plan to take nearly that many losses." At most this is their Worst case, or even their Middle case projection. So I just don't see them stopping their operation for this kind of casualty rate.

It's all wishful thinking. The Russians have plenty of reserves. They prepared this for years. Same goes for their present operations. Perhaps a setback here and  there, but they are completly in control and haven't thrown their full weight in yet. Perhaps they try to give us false hope, so we will be moderate in our sanctions, and think there's something to negotiate with. Typical Russian chessplay.

And losses are something to consider, even for Putin. So he's taking his time. It's not like there's any REAL help underway from abroad, is there?

Edited by Aragorn2002
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It must be particularly galling to be fighting a war and have your air base hit by missiles manufactured in your own country!
Millerovo is the home of 2 x Su-35/FLANKER F multirole fighter squadrons. In a satellite pic I saw (date unknown), the planes were all neatly lined up close to one another on the ramp, not in revetments or HASs (Hardened Aircraft Shelters), making them juicy targets had this been the situation when one or more Tochka-U SSMs dropped in with 450 kg warhead as the gift. 

https://kbm.ru/en/production/otrk/351.html

Tochka-U has a submunition warhead capability, too. During the Cold War, I saw a satellite pic showing the Russians out there on the range frantically trying to fill up the telltale holes the submunitions (think Grad type warhead per) left in the ground. This represents an enormous hazard to exposed aircraft, ordnance, POL vehicles, and personnel when 50 submunitions of that size come hurtling down and detonate.

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/ss-21-scarab-russias-forgotten-deadly-ballistic-missile-17679

Regards,

John Kettler

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seizing vehicles and using them in an attempted coup de main is a classic SO move, especially with the prize being nothing less than capturing the hostile government's seat of power, military HQs, broadcast means, power stations, transport centers, etc. , thus avoiding the otherwise certain devastation and mass casualties (military and civilian) of the MOUT meat grinder and. the stupendous resulting humanitarian disaster AFTER the city was taken. That there was a truck column fully loaded and ready to go right in behind them tells me this was a planned op, not a hasty expedient assault.

Regards,

John Kettler

Edited by John Kettler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, arkhangelsk2021 said:

Finally, a bit of un-necessary cruelty:

 

This is Strela-10 in Kiev. Ukrainian government sources claim that Russian saboteurs are dressed in VSU uniform and crashed into this car.

Edited by DMS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Russian SAM has advanced as far as a residential district in Kiev:

Obolon as a map:

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Obolon,+Kyiv,+Ukraine,+02000/@50.4113225,30.3980939,10z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x40d4d2146b576c33:0xf10debc0e65558a5!8m2!3d50.5122535!4d30.4939596

  

1 minute ago, DMS said:

This is Strela-10 in Kiev. Ukrainian government sources claim that Russian saboteurs are dressed in VSU uniform and crashed into this car.

Now that you say it, I can make out what might be missile tubes. Is it the same one as in the tweet above?

Edited by arkhangelsk2021
Reply to DMS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, DMS said:

Why should he be ashamed, because he was mistaken about government plans? You assume that he knew about attack, but intentionally denied it?

Yes, he should be ashamed, as hard to imagine that might be for you. In your profile you don't state that you're still living in the Soviet Union for nothing. It's that kind of thinking that brought Putin to his actions.

 

Edited by Aragorn2002
Calming down/not wasting more breath on them
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems we will be seeing urban battles in Kiev today.

It looks to me very suicidal for the Russian to drive in to a major metropolitan area with determined enemy resistant with isolated company+ forces.

Compare this to what US has had to do in major Iraq urban operations and still had trouble.

Are they hoping to replicate the US "Thunder run"? I think they will get their teeth kicked in that case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Aragorn2002 said:

Yes, he should be ashamed, as hard to imagine that might be for you. In your profile you don't state that you're still living in the Soviet Union for nothing. It's that kind of thinking that brought Putin to his actions.

 

Can you two take this outside of the thread? Please....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, The_MonkeyKing said:

Seems we will be seeing urban battles in Kiev today.

It looks to me very suicidal for the Russian to drive in to a major metropolitan area with determined enemy resistant with isolated company+ forces.

Compare this to what US has had to do in major Iraq urban operations and still had trouble.

Are they hoping to replicate the US "Thunder run"? I think they will get their teeth kicked in that case.

I saw reports yesterday that they were arming civilians with AK's I am not sure if that will do more harm than good if true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Holien said:

I saw reports yesterday that they were arming civilians with AK's I am not sure if that will do more harm than good if true. 

In terms of causing trouble for the Russian sure it is a gain. So win for the UKR total war effort.

In other terms these urban fights can easily develop to something like Aleppo or Grozny. So lose for humanity at least in the sort term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Andy_101 said:

@Haiduk Not heard from you for a few hours on this thread.  Are you safe?  Are you okay?

Reports about last night show people taking shelter in the underground, I am guessing that we might not hear from him if he is taking shelter or taken up the offer of a free AK47.

I hope he is safe and keeping his head down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm doubting that even urban combat will turn into a meat grinder for Russia.

While Ukraine now tries to arm the general population and encourages them to attack Russian tanks with molotov cocktails, I'm not sure we can compare Ukrainian civilians with the fanatical and literally suicidal jihadist resistance in the Middle East.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jesus.

I never imagined they would be actually going for Kyiv. This is really bad.

All this affair and the military exercises and force buildup at first sounded like some sort of negotiation attempt where you create a problem yourself then offer to fix it in exchange for something. Or some plain bullying and intimidating.

When it began I thought they would try to perhaps cripple the Ukrainian military, maybe create a land bridge to Crimea, even just score a minor tactical victory for domestic purposes in order for Putin to claim he didn't back down and stood up to the west. But this is scary.

You don't send VDV forces to take an airport if you don't intend to later relieve them with ground forces and the thrusts around the capital shown on these graphics speak for themselves.

Was this all planned from the start or did Putin consider backing down would make him appear weak? As much as it is tempting to think of Putin as a madman, this sounds more like some cold and cynical calculated risk.

What's worrying is that can Putin even stop now? If the whole thing ended now, then it sounds likely that strategically it would just make NATO's resolve stronger and Ukraine more likely to join than before which sounds precisely what Moscow wants to avoid.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bulletpoint said:

I'm doubting that even urban combat will turn into a meat grinder for Russia.

While Ukraine now tries to arm the general population and encourages them to attack Russian tanks with molotov cocktails, I'm not sure we can compare Ukrainian civilians with the fanatical and literally suicidal jihadist resistance in the Middle East.

I think the main thread is still the UKR military, but the civilians will help. Operation in an urban environment where you can get shot from 360 degrees at anytime is significant hinderance to any force. 

Dislodging a near-peer opponent from huge urban areas is something entirely different. I don't think the current Russian forces are not capable of doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...