LukeFF

Oh, stuff it already.

What, are you afraid of putting your theories to the test?

Then write us up an AAR and show us neanderthals how it's done. You sure like to type a lot, but you never really show what your strategy actually looks like in the game.

(yawn)

1. Why are you posting this here? 2. For goodness sake, proofread your posts. They are painful to read.

Yes

It heavily depends on the action of the rifle and far less on the training of the shooter. Mausers and Mosins are frankly clumsy rifles to try to cycle while shouldered while yes, the Lee-Enfield is a piece of cake.

I fail to see what is so wrong or sub-par with the way the forum currently displays images. It's a thousand times better than what we had before.

58 GShAP claimed 10 German tanks knocked out with PTABs on 5 July.

Did you even read what Haiduk wrote?

Yes

no

ok

If you had taken the time to research Steve's prior posts on why they don't advertise much, you wouldn't have made such an ill-informed statement. Fact.

I understood your entire post quite well and no, it still does not change what I originally said. If BFC felt there was a way to increase their sales without decreasing their profit margin, I am sure they would pursue such opportunities.

Umm...because they would lose money that way?

C'mon guys, this is a Kettler post. In other words, not worth your time.

Right, and how often were "no enemy aircraft" around in 1944? There's a darn good reason the Luftwaffe switched to the Fw 190 as its main low-level ground attack aircraft.

Then why not put together some missions and let us see how your ideas play out?

The Stuka wasn't dive-bombing any more by this stage in the war.

You didn't search hard enough. Yes, it's been discussed to death.

Why are you so hung up on this "prone lying medic" thing? I've told you in the past it's something medics just don't do, and for good reason.

Oh geez, not again.

Eh, no, they have not.