Jump to content

mazex

Members
  • Posts

    252
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Upvote
    mazex got a reaction from HerrTom in Engine 5 Wishlist   
    Well - graphics that looks 10-15 year old and still run very slow on modern hardware does not help the sales - and more sales brings more features and modules to the ones that have no problem with the 2006 looks. And with a modern graphics engine you can spend your CPU cycles on spotting etc, with super optimized capabilities built into the engine. But more importantly focusing your time on logic that is not built into UE like unit behavior's under fire. And what to do if you spotted something... Or the tank nearby did with a bad radio. Some small caliber munition ricochets off your turret. Close the hatch or not?
    So, for a small team you can focus on what sets you aside from the competition instead of the work needed to do a game engine. And the Battlefront games are truly unique in their value delivery as a tactical battlefield simulation. Even really big studios have stopped building their own game engines as the time spent to build your own is not worth it.
    Just imagine something that looks and works like WARNO - but plays like CM2...
  2. Like
    mazex got a reaction from RockinHarry in Engine 5 Wishlist   
    Well - graphics that looks 10-15 year old and still run very slow on modern hardware does not help the sales - and more sales brings more features and modules to the ones that have no problem with the 2006 looks. And with a modern graphics engine you can spend your CPU cycles on spotting etc, with super optimized capabilities built into the engine. But more importantly focusing your time on logic that is not built into UE like unit behavior's under fire. And what to do if you spotted something... Or the tank nearby did with a bad radio. Some small caliber munition ricochets off your turret. Close the hatch or not?
    So, for a small team you can focus on what sets you aside from the competition instead of the work needed to do a game engine. And the Battlefront games are truly unique in their value delivery as a tactical battlefield simulation. Even really big studios have stopped building their own game engines as the time spent to build your own is not worth it.
    Just imagine something that looks and works like WARNO - but plays like CM2...
  3. Upvote
    mazex got a reaction from RMM in Engine 5 Wishlist   
    Well - graphics that looks 10-15 year old and still run very slow on modern hardware does not help the sales - and more sales brings more features and modules to the ones that have no problem with the 2006 looks. And with a modern graphics engine you can spend your CPU cycles on spotting etc, with super optimized capabilities built into the engine. But more importantly focusing your time on logic that is not built into UE like unit behavior's under fire. And what to do if you spotted something... Or the tank nearby did with a bad radio. Some small caliber munition ricochets off your turret. Close the hatch or not?
    So, for a small team you can focus on what sets you aside from the competition instead of the work needed to do a game engine. And the Battlefront games are truly unique in their value delivery as a tactical battlefield simulation. Even really big studios have stopped building their own game engines as the time spent to build your own is not worth it.
    Just imagine something that looks and works like WARNO - but plays like CM2...
  4. Upvote
    mazex got a reaction from The_Capt in The Combat Mission: Cold War v1.03 patch has been released   
    Thanks guys - it helps to know that you are not alone  Knowing that Lethaface with similar hardware had it running I continued my quest!
    Anyway - as I was loosing hope I did an uninstall and then reinstalled the game. Started in 1.00 (from the installer) and all worked. And it loaded without any black screen and felt snappy. Patched to 1.03 and it still worked... Set all options to max and started a new battle. To my amazement it felt snappier than CMx2 has ever felt! Thinking of it I guess I might not have tried it since I swapped my 3070 for a 3080...
    Anyway - uninstall and then reinstall fixed my problems!
  5. Like
    mazex reacted to OnePingOnly in The Combat Mission: Cold War v1.03 patch has been released   
    This is similar to the (unresolved) issue I posted about. I’m using Win 10 via Boot Camp on the latest Intel Mac with a Radeon Pro XT 5700. I never get to the black screen, however… I get a few seconds of the Windows “thinking” wheel and then… nothing. No icon ever shows up in the tray.
    For me, the other titles take 10s or so to fully open, but the icons do show up in the tray while waiting.
    I also tried running in various compatibility and resolution modes to no avail.
    I also deleted my CW install and did a full reinstall from BFC. This also did not work.
    I filed a ticket, but haven’t received any help. Sucks not being able to play a game I paid good money for.
  6. Like
    mazex reacted to Lethaface in The Combat Mission: Cold War v1.03 patch has been released   
    Might be something with windows 11?

    ther than that I'm also on a 3080 and 1440p (Win10) and 1.03 runs without issue.
  7. Upvote
    mazex got a reaction from A Canadian Cat in Struggling with the use of Armour   
    Was getting depressed and had to try something where those T-72s had to attack instead. Good - look who's burning in the field now? Needed this after that desert  Not that I had much left to give in the end and only one M60 surviving...
    The TOWs and M47s really helped out a lot. Attacking with tanks in ~1980 is not easy. Maybe realistic but it sure is easier with some obstacles and more obvious LOF lines... That M150 that unfortunately paid the ultimate price had four T-72s accounted for. And in a more stationary position the TacAI did fire and then back down nicely to reload in cover etc... Accept that last time when I think a BMP-1 got it with an AT-3 or 5. Felt deserved somehow.

     
  8. Like
    mazex reacted to ratdeath in What Subject For The First CMCW Module?   
    Nordic module with winter terrain
    Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, Finnish and more Russian/Warsaw pact forces of course!
  9. Like
    mazex got a reaction from Sandokan in Struggling with the use of Armour   
    Lol. Just finished the first scenario - and I am HAPPY with this result

  10. Like
    mazex reacted to Ryujin in Struggling with the use of Armour   
    The Capt has some good advice, here's a few other thoughts.
    While your M60's don't have smoke grenades, don't forget about smoke rounds for the main gun or artillery smoke. Try to make sure your tanks have good intel on where the enemy is before peeking, infantry can pass info to turned out tank commanders. Pay attention to who has thermals (TOW vehicles) When you do move into a position, don't just sit there, pop up for a moment then back down. Unless I'm sitting defensively with great fire superiority, I tend to be scooting up and back as needed to feel out the situation. You can do all the annoying spotting stuff to the enemy as well to be out of LOS before they get shots on you. The lack of a hull down order that has the AI move as need and reload in cover is unfortunate, but you can roughly time it out once you get a feel for the spot and engagement times.   You can use very short peeks from cover to test a new position or to do a bait and switch, with one tank peeking for a second to draw attention and withdrawing, followed by other tanks moving up to engage.   You don't need a total victory in every mission, pick your fights if you can. 
  11. Like
    mazex got a reaction from Der Zeitgeist in Struggling with the use of Armour   
    I get a feeling that one generic problem with CMx2 is that the LOF is rather "picky", one second you have it - one second not... I try to roll with all my 10 M60 tanks in line / wedge whatnot formation and even though the landscape is very flat and open it is almost always ends up in a one on one engagement when a Soviet tank is detected. Sometimes two of my M60s engage a T-72 together but it is very hard to get the expected result where a T-72 is spotted and 3-4 tanks target it together that should turn the tables? Sure - we do not want any cheating, if there is no LOF it should not be possible to shoot - but to some extent a commander that notice that the target is getting a bit obscured by a rock / tree / gully would reverse 5 meters or similar instead of just staying where they are - almost with LOF? And if you notice that the tank next to you starts firing at some target to the left you would probably have noticed the dust plume and notified the rest of the platoon that would have "micro positioned" their tanks so that no small ridge ends up obscuring the LOF to that target? Try playing a first person tank game firing at a distant target where you do NOT move a bit forward when a ridge just obscures your target etc. When you are hull down and the target gets out of sight you roll forward 2 meters to be able to fire... Not in CMx2 where the LOF and LOS is lost and that tank spends the rest of the 60 seconds doing nothing?
    So - in a scenario like this where 10 M60 tanks are rolling in a flat landscape and know the general location of the enemy they would not spend 60 seconds where 1 tank is exchanging rounds with a T-72 finally getting punctured and the other tanks around it just stand still doing nothing to help... And they are in both close visual range with their platoon members, radio link etc...
  12. Upvote
    mazex got a reaction from c3k in Struggling with the use of Armour   
    Mmm - I must say that the NTC campaign seems well designed from the pretext that "many commanders coming to Fort Irwing where shocked with the effectiveness of the OPFOR and the enemy equipment they faced"...
  13. Like
    mazex got a reaction from domfluff in Struggling with the use of Armour   
    Mmm - I must say that the NTC campaign seems well designed from the pretext that "many commanders coming to Fort Irwing where shocked with the effectiveness of the OPFOR and the enemy equipment they faced"...
  14. Like
    mazex got a reaction from Bil Hardenberger in Struggling with the use of Armour   
    Mmm - I must say that the NTC campaign seems well designed from the pretext that "many commanders coming to Fort Irwing where shocked with the effectiveness of the OPFOR and the enemy equipment they faced"...
  15. Like
    mazex got a reaction from Bil Hardenberger in Struggling with the use of Armour   
    Lol. Just finished the first scenario - and I am HAPPY with this result

  16. Upvote
    mazex got a reaction from Panzerpanic in Struggling with the use of Armour   
    Lol. Just finished the first scenario - and I am HAPPY with this result

  17. Like
    mazex got a reaction from Flibby in Struggling with the use of Armour   
    Mmm - I must say that the NTC campaign seems well designed from the pretext that "many commanders coming to Fort Irwing where shocked with the effectiveness of the OPFOR and the enemy equipment they faced"...
  18. Like
    mazex reacted to IICptMillerII in Just received an email - it's on!   
    Ha, that is really cool! 
    The ol' Frisbee, from Clancy's Red Storm Rising. 
  19. Like
    mazex reacted to ratdeath in Just received an email - it's on!   
    Discovering games like Project Stealth Fighter (C64) & Red Storm Rising (C64) was the start of a long journey that has taken me to today, now playing Combat Mission Cold War :) And so many, many games in between!
  20. Like
    mazex got a reaction from ratdeath in Just received an email - it's on!   
    Warming up while downloading...
    We where supposed to be neutral in Sweden when I did my military service in Sweden in 1989 and there where supposedly two different tank recognition books. One with Soviet tanks and one with Nato tanks. We never got a copy of the Nato version (for some reason?) so I only know how to identify Swedish or Soviet tanks. So I got to study up on the US vehicles while the download is running. We got an aircraft recognition book that I still have from the airforce that also included US aircraft but the cover photo kind of gave away who might be the real enemy? The lower aircraft is a Swedish JA-37 Viggen on border patrol over the Baltics in the Cold War...
    Browsing it there is an interesting page about the possible F-19 that was actually the F-117 in reality (the book as can be seen is from 1987 and the F-117 was not revealed until 1988)... That old F-19 Stealth Fighter game from one year after this book looks a bit like it... The text translated starts with "Certain information is available about this "invisible" aircraft that is developed using so called stealth technology. The project is protected with great secrecy so very little information is available about it...". 
    Getting geared up into Cold War mood now
     


  21. Like
    mazex got a reaction from Probus in CMx2 on modern computers   
    Great - this one did the trick! In 1920x1080 it's possible to play it and my montitor does an OK job of downscaling even though it gets a bit fuzzy.
    I guess it was 3-4 years since I played CMx2 last time and unfortunately it's really showing it's age now. At first I actually thought it was CMx1 I had started. But oh god how many nice hours I have had with both CMx1 and CMx2. 
  22. Upvote
    mazex reacted to Ithikial_AU in CMx2 on modern computers   
    In your documents folder there should be a text file called "display size.txt". If not create a blank text document. There should be three 0's by default. This will tell the game to use the desktop resolution. Alter the first two numbers for the display size you prefer and the third number is your monitor refresh rate.
  23. Like
    mazex reacted to Ithikial_AU in CMx2 on modern computers   
    FXAA is on. For NVIDIA - go to the control panel and turn it off for each CM application. Can't comment on the resolution issue. I still use an old 1920 x 1200 monitor. 16:10 for life! (Not really...)
  24. Like
    mazex reacted to Bufo in CMx2 on modern computers   
    Hi,
    I also use a QHD monitor, but although the size of the panel at the bottom is not so huge, I have no problems reading the text.
     
    Maybe you have graphical problems like on this picture below that makes the text garbled? This happens when you use an intel GPU.


  25. Upvote
    mazex reacted to Probus in Battlefront Poll Updated   
    9. One Engine - CMx3
    game performance improvments, graphics improvements, ray tracing, intermediate distance bitmaps
    additional editor features, dynamic operational campaigns
    additional gameplay features, coop, LoS tool, visible aircraft
×
×
  • Create New...