JoMac

Oh, and I would agree with that statement...However, this doesn't seem to apply to Gunners & unbuttoned Crew Members, as it should (better Savings Roll for ducking in and out, etc), and making them a little less vulnerable to Small Arms.

I've been hearing only U.S. voices when playing QB's with CW Units...However, the Stock CW Scenarios seem to work normally. Anyone else know about this issue...Possible Bug-ish ?

Welcome aboard the CM Forums, Q...PM sent regarding PBEM Opponent. Thanks, Joe

Chit...I've been caught by the SA Patrol :-)

I think, SLIM, needs to owe you an apology...Just saying.

Yeah, It may be a little difficult to play against the AI now, but it will be more so against an opponent.

I know what you mean...Between the 4.0 Inf behavior, and the to far spacing of Inf (inf taken twice as long to finally reach or leave a spot), and the increased Lethality of Small Arms (notably SMG's & MG's) from game engines of old...Scenarios just don't seem to play as realistic..

WOW !..You are Super-Fast with your turns Orders...It usually takes me twice that, and I only play up to Reinforced Company size Engagements. Joe

WOW !...I mean SERIOUSLY, Cpl.Miller... That Zook Team, in RL, (and in this particular case) probably has about a 90% chance of not getting spotted and firing off a round.

Hello Lucas, Welcome to the BF Forum...No need to contact Subslime at this point as he is to far gone with addiction, and brain is nothing more then mush. However, PM sent regarding PBEM Opponent. Joe

Hmm, I don't see an Opponent Finder Section on BF Community any more...Anyways, see below: Just looking for an opponent to PBEM Platoon size Meeting Engagement Scenarios (will be using QB maps dropped into Scenario Folder and I will Edit that Scenario) for any of the WWII Titles...I know it will get repetitious inwhile, but with slightly different Units and Maps each Scenario it shouldn't be to bad. If interested, just let me know and give me your Dropbox email and will send you an invite. Joe

It already works that way... Oh, you want this included in the 'Action Phase', and not just 'Orders Phase...Got it.

The whole problem with Info Sharing (other then Squads/Teams talking to each other to get right firing position, etc), and why it shouldn't be allowed is that the God-Like-Player already has control over the Battlefield...If the Player sees an Icon, then he can simply move troop quantities around/about in reaction as he sees fit to engage, spot, whatever...(that in RL would take to much time, etc). God-Like-Player coupled with Info Sharing is just to much and gives unrealistic results.

The whole problem with Info Sharing (other then Squads/Teams talking to each other to get right firing position, etc), and why it shouldn't be allowed is that the God-Like-Player already has control over the Battlefield...If the Player sees an Icon, then he can simply move troop quantities around/about in reaction as he sees fit to engage, spot, whatever...(that in RL would take to much time, etc). God-Like-Player coupled with Info Sharing is just to much and gives unrealistic results.

In Bold...Surely, you jest.Troops are already spread out to much.

I still think Scouts (and other units) give C&C Info to fast, and usually all the same or next turn...This is something that should take place before a Game Begins.

I just wish CM would have something above 'Iron Mode' as I find it's not enough...For starters, Scouts give to much C&C info to other units all in the same or next turn.

It's to bad that there isn't a "Revamp Game Engine 4" included in your Poll :-(

Hmmm...I'm going out on a limb here, but I also think it's just a tad bit in the Post War Era.

As others mentioned...Just Surrender that day. However, if you want to prolong their agony, then it's best that the WOP's dont show-up to begin with, and then can surrender another day

Soviet Troops were already fighting with Low Troop Quantities by end of War, and doubt they would have attacked any further past Berlin.

I don't know, but think C-3PO, can decipher this language better...

Are you referring to the 'CMx2 Campaign not being as accurate, and indeed there are supposed to be more Mg's, Mortars, etc...Or, are you saying there are to many of these weapons in the CMx2 Campaign, and you are going to reduce them.

Don't feel Bad...I usually use 'Poor' Equipment for my Troops, and still seem to get the best Firearms.

This is a far better way of designing the Scenario/Campaign as it will give you a better chance for a win.