Jump to content

How Hot is Ukraine Gonna Get?


Probus

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Huba said:

Nah, I checked with original Ukrainian report and it points to the same town, 50km north of Melitopol, around 20 south of the frontline.

Here:

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.3516352,35.3218009,13579m/data=!3m1!1e3

But does it say they captured it, or that they just have a report from there? Captured is a big deal, a report is just the SBU doing its job.

Edit

Cross posted with Huba's answer...

Edited by dan/california
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dan/california said:

But does it say they captured it, or that they just have a report from there? Captured is a big deal, a report is just the SBU doing its job.

Nah, just that they are there, I edited my post. Nothing in the report about taking the village. I'm sure one of our Ukrainian members can confirm that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, womble said:

An MRSI mission is going to be the fastest mission for "that number of rounds", from first shell lofted to last, so will (if it's "enough") mean the time till you can scoot-after-shoot will be the least, which is a Good Thing in a hostile space... :) I get the feeling that a system that's good at MRSI is going to be good at all the other agility factors, too. In, of course, the right hands.

Certainly, given the cooldown time after an MRSI mission, your PH-2000s won't be hanging around in their first firing positions waiting for the sclerotic Russian C3 loop to finish cycling and the CB incoming to start arriving.

As useful as the M777 is, I think there's a strong case to be made for the Canadian Army to also acquire some Panzerhaubitze 2000s...the parts commonality with the existing Leopard 2 fleet would also be an obvious advantage.

Someday...right now Ukraine needs them far more than we do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, danfrodo said:

What a huge saturday in Ukraine!!!!!!!!   Looks like RU Izyum salient under heavy attack, at least by artillery, and quite possibly will be cut off if they don't retreat.   A post I saw elsewhere on May 5 suggested that that was day that we'd look back on as the day the war entered a new phase of Ukrainian victories.  That fella might  be right.

I wonder how much of the current Izyum work is being done w the new western artillery, plus perhaps russian-style ammo stocks supplied by Poland, et al. 

Meanwhile, there's indications that Putler now is moving forces to try to get offensive going farther south, Popasne area.  He just keeps doubling down on his bad bets, w each bet having lower and lower objectives.  Pretty soon he'll be like hitler asking whether some specific building in stalingrad has been taken yet.  Just thinking of that murderous, monstrous killer clown Putin sweating and panicking over some map brings me joy.  He is well and truly f--ed in this war and has swarms of powerful Russian men that want him dead.  And he did it all by choice!  well done, 'genius'!

Out of likes, though many of you who've posted were deserving.

 

 

+1 (also out of likes)

Here's hoping they were right!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, dan/california said:

Но там сказано, что они его захватили, или что у них просто есть репортаж оттуда? Поймать - это большое дело, рапорт - это просто СБУ делает свою работу.

Редактировать

Крест отправлен с ответом Хубы ...

Unfortunately, this is just a report. Burchak is still under Russian control

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aragorn2002 said:

But will 12 PH 2000 (7 from Germany, 5 from the Netherlands) really make that much of a difference. I know they represent tremendous firepower (20 rounds in 2,5 minutes), but not nearly enough to surpress the might of the Russian artillery. On the other hand 240 rounds in 2,5 minutes in a counter battery operation will certainly do some damage.

There are also 20 AS-90's and 12 Caesar's headed that way from the UK and France. So that should be 15ish batteries of really capable SP arty. These two are both said to fire at 6 rounds a minute so that is pretty respectable but not quite as fast as the Pz2000. @Taranis might be able to give some insight into the MRSI capability of such a system.

Overall numbers comparison it isn't much compared to the RA, but they should definitely be a pretty good force multiplier if used as intended to kill RA arty and command. I have no reason to doubt that the UA will impress us with their integration and use. I sure hope we get to see footage of a battery or two of Pz2000's MRSI on an arty/command/supply position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, womble said:

An MRSI mission is going to be the fastest mission for "that number of rounds", from first shell lofted to last, so will (if it's "enough") mean the time till you can scoot-after-shoot will be the least, which is a Good Thing in a hostile space... :) I get the feeling that a system that's good at MRSI is going to be good at all the other agility factors, too. In, of course, the right hands.

Certainly, given the cooldown time after an MRSI mission, your PH-2000s won't be hanging around in their first firing positions waiting for the sclerotic Russian C3 loop to finish cycling and the CB incoming to start arriving.

One of the strongpoints of the PH 2000 is that it can stop, take position and fire within minutes and change position again. Apart from that it's well armored. Practically untouchable for counter fire. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, danfrodo said:

I bet the new UA artillery's first job is to destroy RU artillery.  That's what I'd do.  Arty is the only part of the RU military that is really working.

Well, the PH 2000 also can outrange most other guns, so that indeed sounds like a plan, Dan. Don't know about the other guns, but no doubt they will also be top notch. Imagine all those beautiful incoming grenades upon those Russian artillery positions. Sweet revenge.

Edited by Aragorn2002
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Short Video from PzH 2000 testing by the Bundeswehr in 1997.

I don't think such a rate of fire would be sustainable, but if some of the high ranking officers show up for a meeting once again, I would invest one barrel to get them out of the theatre.

Edited by SteelRain
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SteelRain said:

Short Video from PzH 2000 testing by the Bundeswehr in 1997.

I don't think such a rate of fire would be sustainable, but if some of the high ranking officers show up for a meeting once again, I would invest one barrel to get them out of the theatre.

Very impressive. And with the accuracy of the PH 2000 you won't need more than a couple of minutes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, sross112 said:

There are also 20 AS-90's and 12 Caesar's headed that way from the UK and France. So that should be 15ish batteries of really capable SP arty. These two are both said to fire at 6 rounds a minute so that is pretty respectable but not quite as fast as the Pz2000. @Taranis might be able to give some insight into the MRSI capability of such a system.

Overall numbers comparison it isn't much compared to the RA, but they should definitely be a pretty good force multiplier if used as intended to kill RA arty and command. I have no reason to doubt that the UA will impress us with their integration and use. I sure hope we get to see footage of a battery or two of Pz2000's MRSI on an arty/command/supply position.

Sorry mate, unfortunately I only have very very vague memories of any MRSI. And even less on the theoretical capabilities of the CAESAR. I may have carried out a shooting in training (therefore not in operational shooting) of this type but in my opinion it did not mark me. It's more something at the command level of the platoon or the battery. IMHO, it's mainly useful when you have few guns and complicates the job when shooting from more than two angles. At my level it was not visible, we were given angles and directions of shots and that's it. These are vehicles that are supposed to be accurate at long range (little ammunition used theoretically) and therefore with a platoon (a platoon in french artillery designation is 3-4x guns contrary of our 4x guns batteries' in CMBS) and the rather high rate of fire of a CAESAR, I don't think it's necessary. I have more recollection of the use of positioning fire on a deported zone then a shift of the fire directly on the target. Afterwards, perhaps the tactics have evolved a lot in recent years.
I'd probably be wrong but I think this is more of a theoretical gun capability than a really, commonly used tactic (again IMHO). Time On Target is probably easier with multiple guns. Time On Target is probably easier with multiple guns for having (IMHO) something near the same result. (yes you need more guns)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, dan/california said:

100% guessing, but I think the Poles gave the Ukrainians some SIGNIFICANT AA assets, and the Ukrainian offensive kicked off the minute that and enough NATO 155 were in place.

We don't have any AA to speak of compared to Ukraine's :( Here are some other options:

- PT-91s

- MiGs

- NSM battery

- Spikes

- some Krabs ( Polish AS90 version) 

- more 152,Grad or other ammo

- maybe initial F16 training? 

Edited by Huba
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Organization and vehicle roster and partial personnel roster (personnel assigned to vehicles, I think) for the 126th Coastal Defense Brigade in Crimea (now on Kherson front holding right bank of the Dnipro):

 

Edited by akd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Aragorn2002 said:

Well, the PH 2000 also can outrange most other guns, so that indeed sounds like a plan, Dan. Don't know about the other guns, but no doubt they will also be top notch. Imagine all those beautiful incoming grenades upon those Russian artillery positions. Sweet revenge.

It would make sense to use the limited PzHs for destroying Rus artillery c&c, and organic battalion ISR rather grinding through all the individual batteries, as.well as opportunity decaps on mech brigade/div level c2.

But yah, equalising the artillery playing field is vital.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, SteelRain said:

Short Video from PzH 2000 testing by the Bundeswehr in 1997.

I don't think such a rate of fire would be sustainable, but if some of the high ranking officers show up for a meeting once again, I would invest one barrel to get them out of the theatre.

Well, if you were wondering what happened to the band Scorpions, I think the second half of the video shows where at least one member went to!

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kinophile said:

It would make sense to use the limited PzHs for destroying Rus artillery c&c, and organic battalion ISR rather grinding through all the individual batteries, as.well as opportunity decaps on mech brigade/div level c2.

But yah, equalising the artillery playing field is vital.

Pzh2000, CAESARs andnother L52 guns are also a much better Excalibur launchers, giving 50+ km range. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Huba said:

Pzh2000, CAESARs andnother L52 guns are also a much better Excalibur launchers, giving 50+ km range. 

Yes, I think it's really what will make the difference. Hurting russian guns from safety and hitting hard their logistics hubs !

For the russians : "Das dicke Ende kommt noch" as 1SSF said

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...