Jump to content

sburke

Members
  • Posts

    18,307
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    88

sburke last won the day on June 23

sburke had the most liked content!

6 Followers

About sburke

  • Birthday 07/04/1959

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location:
    : Here..... obviously
  • Interests
    uh..... combat mission.

Converted

  • Location
    San Jose, CA
  • Occupation
    Telecommunications

Recent Profile Visitors

7,017 profile views

sburke's Achievements

Senior Member

Senior Member (3/3)

2.1k

Reputation

  1. because you once again deliberately displayed your bigotry on this forum, exactly as you were doing earlier in this thread. So now you feel obligated to draw me in again? that's on you.
  2. leave me out of this, I don't need to get involved as you dig in on your views.
  3. Banning, not likely Couple notes 1 Not a good thing to post your email. We all don't mind, but Bots may find it. 2 What a bummer. I hadn't looked at Tiller games for a bit and didn't know John had passed. Huge loss for the gaming community.
  4. tear him apart!!! Damn too late again. @Rosseaudifference in period from ww2 to modern fundamentally are what you'll find in a lot of real world documents on weaponry and tactics. For example, optics, infra and thermal viewers, defensive capabilities in armor vehicles, Anti armor attack weapons etc. CMCW is pretty accurate in this sphere. Fascinating thing about CMCW is the representation of a transition point particularly in optics. That being said, if you are doing a review I think you need to invest the time. Otherwise your review will end up being a smattering of things from other people and not really authentic. There are a number of scenarios that are done in different time periods allowing you to feel that transition point when thermal optics become more prevalent for NATO vehicles.
  5. understood, it was more the "presumably with very little, if any, support" that isn't accurate.
  6. LOL it's what I do. I'll be here all week. Try the veal.
  7. it wasn't done outside of BF. Not sure why you think that. A portion of the development was taken on by a couple of people to deliver the concept etc, but it is still Charles, MikeyD etal. "We" wouldn't determine anything. Early War would mean BF developing all those models etc, a whole different level of lift than Cold War. My bet is if it weren't for CMSF2 and CMBS you'd have never seen CMCW at all. There was a significant body of work already done for the end product. Other than a small handful of pieces, Early War would be all new.
  8. That is the curveball here. The AD team are the vehicle crew but have to use dismount as they are primarily a weapons crew. They do not remount as passengers. They also can not use a simple way point to dismount. In other words everything you noted does not apply to them.
  9. Nice try Elvis, but none of us are buying into that. Q says Space Lizards so Space lizards it is. Even Ted Cruz mentioned Americans fighting aliens on July 4th. - an unfortunate leak of BF plans, but blame Ted.
  10. space lobsters were declared an endangered species so they went with lizards. Steve's Maine predilection for lobster not withstanding.
  11. ssshhhhhhh don't tell anyone but I think that is space lizards 😎
  12. LOL yeah that one is a curveball. Don't quote me but I think that is because they are considered a weapon crew.
  13. What should be a bug? I am unclear what you are doing or expecting. Everything I told you in my previous post is correct and does work. I downloaded your file, selected the m1152, selected special/dismount and I have a stinger team adjacent to the vehicle now with a launcher and 2 missiles. I select that team, hit move, put them back in the vehicle, hit acquire and took the remaining 4 missiles and again dismounted and now have 6 missiles. It is working as intended.
×
×
  • Create New...