JM Stuff Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 (edited) 36 minutes ago, BFCElvis said: Screenshots? Ok. I only played this out 3 minutes as an example. 4 squads in 4 buildings. All taking direct arty hits. 2 of the 4 buildings destroyed. Did they break cover and run away in the open? Thank you that you took time to cut your game in test, to send somes screen...late you could probably answer to the behaviours of yours troops in the buildings...but for the time I am already happy to see that the update will be soon... Edited May 1, 2019 by 3j2m7 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFCElvis Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Two buildings were completely leveled in the barrage. In both squads in the collapsed buildings the squad lost 7 out of 10 men. One is Rattled and one is Shaken. The other 2 squads lost 2 and 1 man. Both are Nervous. For what it's worth, the first time i ran this I didn't set the arty to come in for long enough to go the 3 minutes that I had wanted. First turn knocked down a building and that squad was Broken. So the relatively decent state the guys in the screenshots are in is not indicative of anything. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aragorn2002 Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 49 minutes ago, BFCElvis said: Screenshots? Ok. I only played this out 3 minutes as an example. 4 squads in 4 buildings. All taking direct arty hits. 2 of the 4 buildings destroyed. Did they break cover and run away in the open? Doesn't seem to be the case. Can you try the same situation but this time with trenches and foxholes instead of buildings please? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM Stuff Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 The situation and results that you explains seem to be more aggressive that the usual artillery strike without engine update, and inflict more casulties with the engine updated !? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aragorn2002 Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 But with screenshots we of course mean screenshots of the new coming modules. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFCElvis Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 48 minutes ago, Aragorn2002 said: But with screenshots we of course mean screenshots of the new coming modules. No. As more of an answer....They will come as a specific post in the individual game's forum(s). Kinda not cool to throw them out on page 26 of an unrelated thread. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFCElvis Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 1 hour ago, Aragorn2002 said: Doesn't seem to be the case. Can you try the same situation but this time with trenches and foxholes instead of buildings please? Sure..But these are probably the last that I'll have time for today. In both the foxholes and the trenches 1 out of each set of 4 teams bailed after 3 minutes. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFCElvis Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 59 minutes ago, 3j2m7 said: The situation and results that you explains seem to be more aggressive that the usual artillery strike without engine update, and inflict more casulties with the engine updated !? If I understand your question correctly....not necessarily, would be my answer. I only ran these once. If I ran it 10 times the casualty rate would probably be different each time. I wouldn't read too much into the level of casualties in this example. A concern that the patch addresses is having units be more resistant to leaving cover while under fire. I thought it'd be nice to show an example of what that looks like. I pointed out the number of casualties to illustrate how banged up they were and still held their ground. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM Stuff Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 1 minute ago, BFCElvis said: If I understand your question correctly....not necessarily, would be my answer. I only ran these once. If I ran it 10 times the casualty rate would probably be different each time. I wouldn't read too much into the level of casualties in this example. A concern that the patch addresses is having units be more resistant to leaving cover while under fire. I thought it'd be nice to show an example of what that looks like. I pointed out the number of casualties to illustrate how banged up they were and still held their ground. Oki doki no question more for today Have a good game and thank you to these explanations ! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt.Squarehead Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 (edited) 4 hours ago, BFCElvis said: Screenshots? Ok. I only played this out 3 minutes as an example. 4 squads in 4 buildings. All taking direct arty hits. 2 of the 4 buildings destroyed. Did they break cover and run away in the open? 4 hours ago, BFCElvis said: Two buildings were completely leveled in the barrage. In both squads in the collapsed buildings the squad lost 7 out of 10 men. One is Rattled and one is Shaken. The other 2 squads lost 2 and 1 man. Both are Nervous. For what it's worth, the first time i ran this I didn't set the arty to come in for long enough to go the 3 minutes that I had wanted. First turn knocked down a building and that squad was Broken. So the relatively decent state the guys in the screenshots are in is not indicative of anything. 2 hours ago, BFCElvis said: No. As more of an answer....They will come as a specific post in the individual game's forum(s). Kinda not cool to throw them out on page 26 of an unrelated thread. 2 hours ago, BFCElvis said: Sure..But these are probably the last that I'll have time for today. In both the foxholes and the trenches 1 out of each set of 4 teams bailed after 3 minutes. 2 hours ago, BFCElvis said: If I understand your question correctly....not necessarily, would be my answer. I only ran these once. If I ran it 10 times the casualty rate would probably be different each time. I wouldn't read too much into the level of casualties in this example. A concern that the patch addresses is having units be more resistant to leaving cover while under fire. I thought it'd be nice to show an example of what that looks like. I pointed out the number of casualties to illustrate how banged up they were and still held their ground. 'Very' not found. He's good.....He's very good! Edited May 1, 2019 by Sgt.Squarehead 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aragorn2002 Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 On 5/1/2019 at 5:26 PM, BFCElvis said: No. As more of an answer....They will come as a specific post in the individual game's forum(s). Kinda not cool to throw them out on page 26 of an unrelated thread. You can post them anywhere you like as far as I'm concerned, as long as you post them. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gromit Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 (edited) Well, well. Glad to see Die Alte Gang is still alive and kicking. Greetings to all. I can't say I haven't had my own moments of fist-shaking (mostly mental, not actual, mind) at Steve, Charles and all the other code monkeys up in the woods. One wonders if they actually bathe up there... anyway, I digress. I have had a hunch for years now that one slightly insidious human condition might be in play. Namely, a variation of the old standby "Can't see the forest for the trees". Now, don't get your hackles up, all I mean is that this WW2 TO&E stuff is best handled by those with long experience (i.e., our boys S & C) but I have run across too many examples of folks being too close to something to see what is at times obvious to others. Of course that's why you bring in the occasional brilliant new guy (he still squeaks when he turns around!) to help out in this regard. So, I imagine our heroes have enough checks and balances in place to keep from losing themselves day after day. My tongue-in-cheek contribution is my way of saying I love these guys, warts and all- despite their extreme proficiency at torquing my patience now and then. Hope everyone is doing fine and healthy. Looking forward to the releases guys! Edited May 3, 2019 by Gromit 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BletchleyGeek Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 12 minutes ago, Gromit said: their extreme proficiency at torquing my patience now and then Here, sir, take a bow for that beautiful sentence. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sburke Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 On 5/1/2019 at 1:36 AM, Ales Dvorak said: 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ales Dvorak Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 (edited) But .. but ...Pessimist is an optimist with experiences. Edited May 3, 2019 by Ales Dvorak 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muzzleflash1990 Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 Accountant: Our water supply is running low. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Emrys Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 An optimist is someone who believes that "This is as good as it gets." A pessimist is someone who lives in dread that the optimist may turn out to be right. Michael 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt.Squarehead Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilM Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 10 hours ago, Muzzleflash1990 said: Accountant: Our water supply is running low. Accountant: Your water supply is running low ... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xorg_Xalargsky Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 Terran Adjutant : not enough minerals 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFCElvis Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 Very very close 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
domfluff Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 Hmmm... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
domfluff Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 I mean, patches are live. Go go? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mirekm61 Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 already downloaded 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
domfluff Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 CMBN Carrier platoon bug is fixed 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.