Jump to content

LukeFF

Members
  • Posts

    3,901
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by LukeFF

  1. About the Ukrainian Air Force: http://theaviationist.com/2014/08/04/mig-29-flight-status/ http://theaviationist.com/2014/12/09/mig-29-digital-camo/
  2. You're still stuck in a Spring 2014 timeframe.
  3. Even if all of those ~425000 MP44s were actually issued, that's not a whole lot, given the size of the German military.
  4. It's a screen showing a digital GPS combat map. Kind of like the U.S. military's Blue Force Tracker.
  5. That medic better get rid of those hand grenades.
  6. No, the idea that China would get involved in such a conflict is even less grounded in reality than the idea that NATO would not come to aid of a country that wants to...join NATO. Throwing China into the pot would just make it look like BF wants to add China for no particular reason. Say what you will about the US becoming involved in a Ukrainian conflict, but the fact remains that the US, UK, and doubtless other NATO militaries have been and are conducting NATO exercises in eastern European nations such as Poland, and I highly doubt that's because they just find the scenery of Poland to be pleasant.
  7. Sorry, not even close. Given the backstory to the game, America showing up is far more plausible than China showing up which, like I said above, would be too much of a stretch. Given the economics of game development and the game's region, it's probably safe to say the US Marines and British Army will be among the first NATO combatants added in a module. Poland is probably also a strong candidate. Germany....maybe. Their military isn't all that geared right now for a big-time military clash, and politically their population is very much against deploying the military for offensive operations. That, and to paraphrase one of the ISAF commanders, their performance in Afghanistan resembled an "aggressive camping trip." There'd also be of course the whole psychological matter of sending the German military back to what was its graveyard in WWII.
  8. Non-NATO nation, for one thing, and it would be quite a stretch to work in a plausible scenario where they would show up in the middle of Eastern Europe.
  9. Unity has already been stated to be the next engine for CM.
  10. There's plenty of info on the forums detailing what 3.0 brings. Run a search or two. Or three.
  11. Not that they really would be a valid choice, seeing that they aren't a NATO member and aren't really equipped for a prolonged engagement.
  12. Using your enemy's weapons has a bad habit of attracting friendly fire to your position.
  13. Nope, nope, and nope, and not gonna happen code-wise in the future. Seek and you shall find plenty of discussion here about this in prior topics.
  14. Please don't quote all of that text & images if you're just going to ask a one-line question.
  15. Plenty of people were complaining that it was rubbish. Apparently you've not been keeping up with posts here lately. Sure, if you liked having to refresh the forum constantly for it to recognize one's login info and not having it properly mark topics as read, then it was great, but I've a hunch not many people were in that group.
×
×
  • Create New...