Rinaldi

This is by far the stupidest thing I've read on the forums in a goddamned long time. 

Someone here is failing to understand, that's for sure LMAO

This is by far the stupidest thing I've read on the forums in a goddamned long time. 

Someone here is failing to understand, that's for sure LMAO

You can toss them up in the scenario editor and look at them from the deploy (allied)/(axis), but otherwise there's nothing, unfortunately. 

Thanks for the reply - I am glad I don't seem to be missing something then
Oh, and big up the Brighton Massive!

Oh look yet another 'hulldown is actually counter intuitive'  - this silliness is right up there with 'maps are too small'

 
Everyone. Take. A. Shot.

Support formations generally aren't simulated in CM unless they have a direct combat role, and even then some of the more niche combat support units are not present. Combat engineers (the actual 12B's) are in game and are already attached to the combined arms battalions, but that is the only real engineering asset you get access too. There aren't any breaching vehicles like the ABV or bridging vehicles either. I'm personally hoping that we will eventually get an engineering vehicle pack that adds mine plows and the ABV at least, but there are no plans for that as of now. 

Oh look yet another 'hulldown is actually counter intuitive'  - this silliness is right up there with 'maps are too small'

 
Everyone. Take. A. Shot.

Oh look yet another 'hulldown is actually counter intuitive'  - this silliness is right up there with 'maps are too small'

 
Everyone. Take. A. Shot.

Oh look yet another 'hulldown is actually counter intuitive'  - this silliness is right up there with 'maps are too small'

 
Everyone. Take. A. Shot.

Oh look yet another 'hulldown is actually counter intuitive'  - this silliness is right up there with 'maps are too small'

 
Everyone. Take. A. Shot.

A lone Tommy mech company stares down an unexpected Syrian attack!

"The fate of the Canadian consulate personnel is unknown."  Don't mean to sound snarky, but that sounds like complete failure if the whole point was to rescue them.  Shades of Vietnam "We won all the battles".  Yeah, but who cares if ya lost the war?

This is excellent stuff, I remember being very excited when I first saw ARMOR magazine touting SF1 and a few individual Canadian army units using it ad-hoc to help visualize otherwise bland wargaming; it never moved on to anything beyond such individual initiatives (which you've explained earlier). This is a massive step-up to see ready made versions for use with armed forces. Congratulations guys.

It's been a while since I've played such a large PBEM or even one with so many vehicles, here's a little vignette AAR from my recently concluded match with @gardar15. 

Read it here: https://rinaldiaars.blogspot.com/2020/05/equilibrium-black-sea-vignette-aar.html

I thought so. 

That was a great AAR. Very informative. Looking forward to your next effort

It's been a while since I've played such a large PBEM or even one with so many vehicles, here's a little vignette AAR from my recently concluded match with @gardar15. 

Read it here: https://rinaldiaars.blogspot.com/2020/05/equilibrium-black-sea-vignette-aar.html

It's been a while since I've played such a large PBEM or even one with so many vehicles, here's a little vignette AAR from my recently concluded match with @gardar15. 

Read it here: https://rinaldiaars.blogspot.com/2020/05/equilibrium-black-sea-vignette-aar.html

It's been a while since I've played such a large PBEM or even one with so many vehicles, here's a little vignette AAR from my recently concluded match with @gardar15. 

Read it here: https://rinaldiaars.blogspot.com/2020/05/equilibrium-black-sea-vignette-aar.html

Okay, I lied.  One more picture.  While trying to decide what scenario to do an AAR on, I found I needed to really tweak stuff around to get nighttime looking good.

Video here: https://i.imgur.com/BggbJjX.mp4

No.

TOW missile about to schwack enemy armour ...

...could be why I specified conventional... you think?  😉