Sgt.Squarehead

John's a bit of a legend in these parts.

If you want maximum content & maximum difference from the base-game, I'd buy in this order: NATO. Then UK. Then USMC. However, you will inevitably eventually buy the lot anyway.....So why not just get the bundle and take the discount?

Soviet & DRA Recon units advance after a minor skirmish: Screenshot from the excellent 'Competent Incompetence' campaign.....Played it for a bit of light relief before returning to the editor, highly recommended.

Close combat on Reno River (R2V):

I'd guess this could be fitted on an 'as needed' basis. The latter, same as the 'petals' on the T-80U: TBH the T-72AMT looks a solid little upgrade.....It would certainly make a great addition to the CM:BS TOE lineup (let's face it, historical accuracy is well out of the window already). PS - @Battlefront.com I wouldn't say no to a few T-80Us & T-80BVMs while you were about it.

Makes sense to me.....I wouldn't fancy chucking that thing over my shoulder and climbing up a mountain with it.

Nope, that's an unaltered image.....Well known one too, my buddy used it for reference when modelling the dinks & scrapes on the nose of his 1/72 A-10.

If it wants a key, I don't think it's the demo.

Possibly of interest:

More fun with BTR-4 quality control: http://gurkhan.blogspot.com/2020/01/4_24.html

Agreed.....TBH an industrial buildings pack would be useful for all the games.

Nope.....I believe that one may be down to @dragonwynn.

Take care man.

Really looking forward to seeing how this project develops.....I'd love to use these in CM:BN.

I'm optimistic that this will be sorted in the upcoming module.....IMHO we should also see the larger systems like Uragan & Smerch. @BFCElvis mentioned that the module was in the works and that the team are still open to nagging suggestions, so now is probably the time to be asking.

Figured as much, cheers for confirming it.

TBH I find it hard to imagine that more than one charge could act on a long-rod at once, all the others would be at sub-optimal distances. There's a video modelling the likely effect of that charge in the thread IIRC (made by a dude who either does explosions for a living or is studying to do so) and I certainly don't know enough to contradict it.

Amen to that!

That sounds fun.

As an interested spectator, but I save a lot of texts and keep links to a lot of others.....However I'm also not terribly well organised. @HerrTom might be able to better answer your questions, the only one I would be prepared to venture an opinion on would be #2, where I would agree that the mass of the EFP would be of very great significance, alongside its density and velocity (presumably distance too).

@Combatintman, @Attilaforfun, you guys would know,.....Are AFV supply depots/dumps usually organised like a candy store? Pick & mix ammo for all? I'm guessing no.

I may be able to help with links to various texts cited in the posts.....No promises on everything though, there's a lot of stuff in that thread and it could take me a while to find them. PS - FWIW I don't believe either @exsonic01 or @IMHO were being intentionally rude.....You've both raised interesting points, we've got links to consult, so let's see if we can move forward, rather than squabble about the minutia.

As mentioned there appear to be some major issues with the alleged working mechanism of 'Nozh': http://sturgeonshouse.ipbhost.com/topic/1528-no-nozh-doesnt-work-as-advertised/?tab=comments#comment-111895

Well, at least someone is being honest about their position: https://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2020/01/taliban-admits-peace-negotiations-with-u-s-are-merely-means-to-withdrawal-foreign-forces.php Poor bloody Afghanistan.

Yup.....Just do 'em ten at a time and keep on saving.