Jump to content

The Peng Challenge Thread Podcast - For Pods By Pods


Recommended Posts

Originally posted by Nidan1:

I have been quit for 1 Year, 1 Week, 9 hours and 22 minutes (372 days). I have saved $3,723.89 by not smoking 14,895 cigarettes. I have saved 1 Month, 3 Weeks, 17 hours and 15 minutes of my life. My Quit Date: 3/31/2005 5:09 AM

What's your point?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 295
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by Abbott:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Nidan1:

I have been quit for 1 Year, 1 Week, 9 hours and 22 minutes (372 days). I have saved $3,723.89 by not smoking 14,895 cigarettes. I have saved 1 Month, 3 Weeks, 17 hours and 15 minutes of my life. My Quit Date: 3/31/2005 5:09 AM

What's your point? </font>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Nidan1:

Or I can ply Seanachai with cheap booze or top shelf sterno, and get him to declare it so in a drunken display of verbosity. [/QB]

Isn’t this the same Seanachai that once invited tournament players into the One thread and who made Meeks, apparently as crazy as a tree full of rats, our King?

Yet ask yourself… did these whims of his actually stand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Lars:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Abbott:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Nidan1:

I have been quit for 1 Year, 1 Week, 9 hours and 22 minutes (372 days). I have saved $3,723.89 by not smoking 14,895 cigarettes. I have saved 1 Month, 3 Weeks, 17 hours and 15 minutes of my life. My Quit Date: 3/31/2005 5:09 AM

What's your point? </font>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Speedy:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Lars:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Abbott:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Nidan1:

I have been quit for 1 Year, 1 Week, 9 hours and 22 minutes (372 days). I have saved $3,723.89 by not smoking 14,895 cigarettes. I have saved 1 Month, 3 Weeks, 17 hours and 15 minutes of my life. My Quit Date: 3/31/2005 5:09 AM

What's your point? </font>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Nidan1:

I have been quit for 1 Year, 1 Week, 9 hours and 22 minutes (372 days). I have saved $3,723.89 by not smoking 14,895 cigarettes. I have saved 1 Month, 3 Weeks, 17 hours and 15 minutes of my life. My Quit Date: 3/31/2005 5:09 AM

*takes a long drag on his cigarette* So?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Abbott:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Speedy:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Lars:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Abbott:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Nidan1:

I have been quit for 1 Year, 1 Week, 9 hours and 22 minutes (372 days). I have saved $3,723.89 by not smoking 14,895 cigarettes. I have saved 1 Month, 3 Weeks, 17 hours and 15 minutes of my life. My Quit Date: 3/31/2005 5:09 AM

What's your point? </font>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Berlichtingen:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Nidan1:

I have been quit for 1 Year, 1 Week, 9 hours and 22 minutes (372 days). I have saved $3,723.89 by not smoking 14,895 cigarettes. I have saved 1 Month, 3 Weeks, 17 hours and 15 minutes of my life. My Quit Date: 3/31/2005 5:09 AM

*takes a long drag on his cigarette* So? </font>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Nidan1:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr /> Originally posted by Joe Shaw:

Remember, a group that will take anybody is full of nobodies.

Your presence certainly proves that theorem. </font>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Nidan1:

...that theorem.

As tha' leek penethillin? As tha' wha' hailped ye surveeve tha 60's?

Ah were watchin' "Casino Royale" thas mornin'. Ah bet Ursula Andress didnae look lak tha' anymore...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by OGSF:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Nidan1:

...that theorem.

As tha' leek penethillin? As tha' wha' hailped ye surveeve tha 60's?

Ah were watchin' "Casino Royale" thas mornin'. Ah bet Ursula Andress didnae look lak tha' anymore... </font>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Joe Shaw:

I warned against it...whine, whine, whine, bitch, bitch, bitch...

I bet you warned people against buying stock in Xerox back in the '60s too.

But unfortunately I was overrulled and we were then saddled with the lesser lights of the likes of Abbot, Michael Emyrs and Grog Dorosh.
In my case at least, you were immeasurably uplifted and rewarded, you silly senile coot. I won't make the same claim for the others.

And look what's happened ...
You've had the golden light of my presence fall upon you. Your life has been enriched thereby.

My judgement in these matters has been proven [EDIT: laughable] time and again.
Remember, a group that will take anybody is full of nobodies.
Which, as Nidan observed, explains your presence here.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Boo Radley:

And in other news, Peng decided to take the remnants of two platoons and their leader (all of whom had been mercilessly mauled by my vet 50 cal) and assault my Sherman.

They're all dead now.

As I said in my grovel for a ceasefire...

My penchant for feckless banzai charges never ceases to astound me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by MrPeng:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Boo Radley:

And in other news, Peng decided to take the remnants of two platoons and their leader (all of whom had been mercilessly mauled by my vet 50 cal) and assault my Sherman.

They're all dead now.

As I said in my grovel for a ceasefire...

My penchant for feckless banzai charges never ceases to astound me. </font>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Joe Shaw:

...I warned against it at the time of course, my duties to the MBT demanded no less. But unfortunately I was overrulled and we were then saddled with the lesser lights of the likes of Abbot, Michael Emyrs and Grog Dorosh.

And look what's happened ...

My judgement in these matters has been proven correct time and again. Remember, a group that will take anybody is full of nobodies.

Joe

It's sweet, though, that you think enough of Abbott, Michael Emrys and God Dorosh to mention them in your post here. That must make them worthy of something, no?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Bugged:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Joe Shaw:

...I warned against it at the time of course, my duties to the MBT demanded no less. But unfortunately I was overrulled and we were then saddled with the lesser lights of the likes of Abbot, Michael Emyrs and Grog Dorosh.

And look what's happened ...

My judgement in these matters has been proven correct time and again. Remember, a group that will take anybody is full of nobodies.

Joe

It's sweet, though, that you think enough of Abbott, Michael Emrys and God Dorosh to mention them in your post here. That must make them worthy of something, no? </font>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Joe Shaw:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Bugged:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Joe Shaw:

...I warned against it at the time of course, my duties to the MBT demanded no less. But unfortunately I was overrulled and we were then saddled with the lesser lights of the likes of Abbot, Michael Emyrs and Grog Dorosh.

And look what's happened ...

My judgement in these matters has been proven correct time and again. Remember, a group that will take anybody is full of nobodies.

Joe

It's sweet, though, that you think enough of Abbott, Michael Emrys and God Dorosh to mention them in your post here. That must make them worthy of something, no? </font>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Bugged:

Look here.

*holds up personal invite into this thread (scroll down, way down), extended by the great Seanachai himself*

I've read the rules of this thread and you, sir, are out of line.

Sigh. Time to put on my Olde One robes, hat and mystical jewelry. In the Old One biz, we call it the 'Authority Aura Strap-On'.

Joseph, has there been anyone who has shown you more support than I? Has there ever been another Olde One more accepting of your almost...magical preoccupation with Duty-Place-Rules?

There has not.

So, Josephus, what am I to make of the fact that, while questions are being asked about 'Silverwaregate', you are DISRESPECTING A LADY OF THE 'POOL?!

As far as I know, Shaw spoken with cold precision, abjuring the more familiar 'Joe', there is only one being who may show disrespect to the Ladies of the 'Pool.

Usually it's Peng, because he's a swine. And Mark IV could usually get away with it, because he had an insouciant attitude in general.

But, whoever or whatever it might be, it is not you, Joe. As the very most demented keeper of completely made-up and often completely buggered traditions, you must show respect for the Ladies of the 'Pool.

Even when they get crazy, or violent, or way strange. That's just how it goes. If they do, of course, it's not inappropriate to offer them a cooling drink or, if necessary, use a dart rifle.

But with respect, Joe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...