ChatGPT and Combat Mission

[sttp]

Have you guys tried to ask ChatGPT questions about Combat Mission? It's pretty amazing, and I have no idea how it could possibly access some of the specific information I asked about, like describe the map and units and objectives in the mission entitled XXXX. Not sure where or how it would find such information... almost like it's delving into game manuals, mission briefings, mission map layouts from the editor (unlikely!), or supplementary pdfs or something. It's super interesting and impressive, but a little bit creepy in some ways too.

I was sorta skeptical and thinking of this thing as just a talking search engine or something, but it is so much more.

I'll paste in just a short snippet of my "conversation" with it. (Not sure why the text of my questions isn't showing up, but it's pretty obvious from the context what I asked it.)

 

Quote

what are hte most popular combat mission battle for normandy missions?

 

 

 

 

The popularity of Combat Mission Battle for Normandy missions can vary depending on personal preferences and playstyles. However, here are some of the most well-known and highly regarded missions in the game:

1. "Red Thunder" - This mission is a German counter-attack against Soviet forces in the summer of 1944. It features a variety of tank and infantry battles and is known for its challenging gameplay.

2. "Omaha Beach" - This mission puts players in the shoes of American forces landing on the infamous Omaha Beach on D-Day. It's a difficult mission that requires careful planning and execution to successfully capture the beach.

3. "Crossing the Dykes" - This mission takes place in the Netherlands in 1944, as British forces attempt to cross a series of canals and dykes in order to advance on German positions. It's a challenging mission that requires a mix of infantry and armored tactics.

4. "The Cauldron" - This mission is set during the Battle of Mortain in August 1944, as American forces attempt to hold off a German counter-attack. It's a difficult mission that requires a combination of defensive and offensive tactics.

5. "Operation Martlet" - This mission is a fictional engagement between British and German forces in the Normandy countryside. It's known for its large-scale battles and variety of terrain.

These are just a few examples of popular missions in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy. There are many more scenarios and campaigns available, each with its own unique challenges and objectives.

 

 

can you mkae the list 25 missions long, and include missions only from Battle for Normandy and Final Blitzkrieg (including the addon packs Market Garden, Commonwealth forces, Vehicle Pack, and Battlepack 1)

 

 

 

 

Certainly! Here is a list of 25 popular missions from Combat Mission Battle for Normandy and Final Blitzkrieg, including the add-on packs:

1. "Red Thunder" (Battle for Normandy)
2. "Omaha Beach" (Battle for Normandy)
3. "Crossing the Dykes" (Battle for Normandy)
4. "The Cauldron" (Battle for Normandy)
5. "Operation Martlet" (Battle for Normandy)
6. "Goodwood" (Vehicle Pack)
7. "Missions for the Lazy" (Battlepack 1)
8. "Blockbuster" (Commonwealth Forces)
9. "Monte Cassino" (Market Garden)
10. "Race to the Rhine" (Battle for Normandy)
11. "The Last Victory" (Final Blitzkrieg)
12. "The Sleeping Giant" (Battle for Normandy)
13. "Panzer Ace" (Final Blitzkrieg)
14. "Operation Charnwood" (Battle for Normandy)
15. "Fire Brigade" (Commonwealth Forces)
16. "Dead Man's Corner" (Vehicle Pack)
17. "Sudden Fury" (Battle for Normandy)
18. "Bloody Gulch" (Battle for Normandy)
19. "Hell's Highway" (Market Garden)
20. "Ghosts of Hatten" (Final Blitzkrieg)
21. "A Quiet Outpost" (Battle for Normandy)
22. "The Hedgerow Hell" (Vehicle Pack)
23. "Devil's Hill" (Commonwealth Forces)
24. "Hill 112" (Battle for Normandy)
25. "Breaking the Line" (Final Blitzkrieg)

These missions offer a mix of infantry and armored combat, along with a variety of objectives and terrain. They are among the most well-regarded scenarios in the game, and offer a challenging and immersive experience for players.

 

 

what is the breaking the line mission aout, and what forces are involved?

 

 

 

 

"Breaking the Line" is a mission in Combat Mission Final Blitzkrieg. The mission takes place in December 1944, during the Battle of the Bulge. The mission involves the US Army's 2nd Infantry Division attempting to break through the German lines and advance towards the town of Krinkelt. The German forces are a mix of infantry and armor, including elements of the 12th SS Panzer Division.

The mission takes place in a rural area with dense forests, hills, and open fields. The US player has a mix of infantry, armor, and artillery at their disposal, and must use them effectively to overcome the German defenses. The German player has dug in their forces and set up a series of strongpoints to defend against the US attack.

The objective of the mission is for the US player to advance through the German lines, secure key objectives, and ultimately reach the town of Krinkelt. The German player must prevent the US advance and inflict as many casualties as possible.

"Breaking the Line" is a challenging and immersive mission that offers a mix of infantry and armor combat, as well as a variety of tactical challenges.

 

 

how about The Last victory?

 

 

 

 

"The Last Victory" is a mission in Combat Mission Final Blitzkrieg. The mission takes place in March 1945, towards the end of World War II in Europe. The mission involves the German Army's 11th Panzer Division attempting to break through the US Army's 9th Armored Division and capture the town of Menden.

The mission takes place in a rural area with open fields, wooded areas, and scattered buildings. The German player has a mix of infantry and armor at their disposal, and must use them effectively to break through the US defenses. The US player has dug in their forces and set up a series of strongpoints to defend against the German attack.

The objective of the mission is for the German player to advance through the US lines, secure key objectives, and ultimately reach the town of Menden. The US player must prevent the German advance and inflict as many casualties as possible.

"The Last Victory" is a challenging mission that offers a mix of infantry and armor combat, as well as a variety of tactical challenges. The mission offers a unique opportunity for players to experience the final days of the war in Europe, and the desperation and intensity of the German offensive.

 

 

what is the map and terrain like in that mission. Are there towns and villages, or is it mostly open? Is the terrain mostly flat, or is it hilly?

 

 

 

 

The map and terrain in "The Last Victory" mission is a rural area with a mix of open fields and scattered buildings, as well as some wooded areas. The terrain is mostly flat, with some gentle rolling hills in places. There are several small towns and villages located throughout the map, including the town of Menden, which is the ultimate objective of the German player.

The terrain is fairly open in some areas, but there are plenty of opportunities for cover and concealment, especially in the wooded areas and around buildings. The open fields offer little cover, but they can be used for maneuvering and flanking the enemy.

The map is relatively large, with a lot of room for maneuvering and flanking. There are several key objectives located throughout the map, including crossroads, bridges, and buildings that offer tactical advantages.

Overall, the map and terrain in "The Last Victory" mission offer a mix of challenges and opportunities for players. The flat terrain and scattered buildings offer good opportunities for maneuvering and flanking, while the small towns and villages offer opportunities for close-quarters combat.

 

Edited April 21, 2023 by sttp

[sttp]

Can't edit my post, so I'll add:

I just asked it how to place buildings and hedgerows within the mission editor, and it answered perfectly and with surprising detail and speed.

I also asked it to recite the mission briefing for the US side in "Breaking the Line", and it listed it immediately.

Finally, I asked it to list each objective and the number of points associated with each for a certain mission, and again, it did it perfectly.

WHAT in the hell?!

Now I'm not saying the things I asked are particularly useful, but it's interesting to imagine what else it could do if pushed to its limits.

It's like I'm talking to Enterprise's computer in Star Trek: The Next Generation.

Siri times 100!

Edited April 21, 2023 by sttp

[Bulletpoint]

As someone in the creative field, I don't know whether to feel amazed or depressed that this AI will probably take my job soon.

Also, I feel insulted that it didn't mention any of my scenarios ;(

[PEB14]

I'm not that impressed. Out of the Top 5 list of scenarios you've asked for, only "Omaha Beach" does exist. AFAIK there is nothing like:

• Red Thunder" (Battle for Normandy)
• "Crossing the Dykes" (Battle for Normandy)
• "The Cauldron" (Battle for Normandy)
• "Operation Martlet"
• Battle for Normandy)
• "Goodwood" (Vehicle Pack)
• "Missions for the Lazy" (Battlepack 1)

I've strong concerns with those ChatGPT stuff. It spits words one after another based on statistical analysis on tons of webpages, and people drink these words like supra-biblical truth.

[ratdeath]

Hello ChatGPT, who is John Kettler?

 

John Kettler is a name that is associated with conspiracy theories and alleged government cover-ups. He claimed to be a former Defense Department contractor and intelligence analyst who had insider knowledge of secret government programs, extraterrestrial life, and advanced technologies. He gained a following online by sharing his theories and information through his website, blog, and social media accounts.

However, it is important to note that there is no independent verification of his claims, and many of his theories and stories have been debunked by experts and fact-checkers. Some have also raised questions about his background and qualifications. Therefore, it is advisable to approach any information or claims made by John Kettler with skepticism and critical thinking.

[Butschi]

3 minutes ago, PEB14 said:

I'm not that impressed. Out of the Top 5 list of scenarios you've asked for, only "Omaha Beach" does exist. AFAIK there is nothing like:

• Red Thunder" (Battle for Normandy)
• "Crossing the Dykes" (Battle for Normandy)
• "The Cauldron" (Battle for Normandy)
• "Operation Martlet"
• Battle for Normandy)
• "Goodwood" (Vehicle Pack)
• "Missions for the Lazy" (Battlepack 1)

I've strong concerns with those ChatGPT stuff. It spits words one after another based on statistical analysis on tons of webpages, and people drink these words like supra-biblical truth.

Well, it is the old glass half full or half empty question. As someone working in this field, let me assure you this is ground breaking. Of course ChatGPT is far from perfect. But compared with what chat bots could do 10 or just 5 years ago it is amazing. And this is only the beginning of what seems to be possible with these new Foundation models.

[PEB14]

23 minutes ago, Butschi said:

Well, it is the old glass half full or half empty question. As someone working in this field, let me assure you this is ground breaking. Of course ChatGPT is far from perfect. But compared with what chat bots could do 10 or just 5 years ago it is amazing. And this is only the beginning of what seems to be possible with these new Foundation models.

But that's only a ChatBot.

A bot who chats.

Nothing less, but nothing more. It's supposed to be "Artificial Intelligence", but there is not a drop of intelligence behind. Just mass data analysis.

(I've nothing against the AI in general, it's very useful in my own field, but I cannot understand the purpose of a ChatBot based on data stats…)

[Codreanu]

35 minutes ago, ratdeath said:

Hello ChatGPT, who is John Kettler?

 

 

John Kettler is a name that is associated with conspiracy theories and alleged government cover-ups. He claimed to be a former Defense Department contractor and intelligence analyst who had insider knowledge of secret government programs, extraterrestrial life, and advanced technologies. He gained a following online by sharing his theories and information through his website, blog, and social media accounts.

However, it is important to note that there is no independent verification of his claims, and many of his theories and stories have been debunked by experts and fact-checkers. Some have also raised questions about his background and qualifications. Therefore, it is advisable to approach any information or claims made by John Kettler with skepticism and critical thinking.

Clearly ChatGPT is controlled by the Greys.

[ratdeath]

11 minutes ago, Codreanu said:

Clearly ChatGPT is controlled by the Greys.

The aliens?

[Codreanu]

3 minutes ago, ratdeath said:

The aliens?

Oh yes, absolutely. I bet ChatGPT doesn't believe that there was a nuclear weapon used at Kursk either . Poor John.

[A Canadian Cat]

1 hour ago, PEB14 said:

I'm not that impressed. Out of the Top 5 list of scenarios you've asked for, only "Omaha Beach" does exist. AFAIK there is nothing like:

• Red Thunder" (Battle for Normandy)
• "Crossing the Dykes" (Battle for Normandy)
• "The Cauldron" (Battle for Normandy)
• "Operation Martlet"
• Battle for Normandy)
• "Goodwood" (Vehicle Pack)
• "Missions for the Lazy" (Battlepack 1)

I've strong concerns with those ChatGPT stuff. It spits words one after another based on statistical analysis on tons of webpages, and people drink these words like supra-biblical truth.

Yep. It always answers with confidence - even when it's making stuff up. Which is really really bad IMHO.

Mind you we all know at least one friend in RL that does the same

[womble]

1 hour ago, ratdeath said:

He gained a following online by sharing his theories and information through his website, blog, and social media accounts.

It really does make things up, don't it? Or was there a secret cabal of Kettlerites somewhere? Speaks to some of the limitations of ChatGPT et alia: just because lots of people quoted him doesn't mean he had a following. Context matters, and can be difficult to nail down.

 

[Redwolf]

1 hour ago, Codreanu said:

Clearly ChatGPT is controlled by the Greys.

I am Grey. I stand between the candle and the star. We are Grey. We stand between the darkness and the light.

[Butschi]

1 hour ago, PEB14 said:

But that's only a ChatBot.

A bot who chats.

Nothing less, but nothing more. It's supposed to be "Artificial Intelligence", but there is not a drop of intelligence behind. Just mass data analysis.

(I've nothing against the AI in general, it's very useful in my own field, but I cannot understand the purpose of a ChatBot based on data stats…)

I see what you mean, but: The thing about intelligence is that we humans can't even properly define how our own intelligence works. So it is a bit ... preposterous to claim that something doesn't have intelligence. Anyway, if we don't believe in magic, the human brain doesn't work all that different. You have learned a big bunch of parameters from a dataset ("experience") and produce output based on the input (external stimuli) and the parameters (your neurons). So it is really, really hard to define where intelligence starts. Biologically the brain of a mouse is not very different from a human. Is it intelligent? What about a fish? What's more, we are not that far from where chatbots pass the Turing Test consistently (ChatGPT did it at least partly, i.e. with some testers). At that point, meaning when you can't decide whether there is a human or a machine sitting on the other side, you have no way of telling if it is artificial "intelligence", artificial intelligence or real, human intelligence - and what it all means because you have no way of knowing what is going on inside the skull of another human being. Sorry for the philosophical monologue.

About the more practical stuff: Suppose you are looking for an algorithm to solve a problem. In order to get a good answer from google you usually need to know how the algorithm is called or at least the class of algorithms it belongs to. Which, very often means you start blind and maybe you get lucky by randomly given it the right search phrases. Yes, technically ChatGPT is a chat bot but a chat bot which you can give a problem statement in natural language, just as you would a colleague. And it will then tell you which algorithm you can use to solve it, explain the algorithm, give you python code and discuss how to modify it if you have special wishes. Try that with google. True, it doesn't always give you the right answer or working code, but more often than not you at least know where to look further or which questions to ask. Try that with your average colleague.

[Chibot Mk IX]

Regarding ChatGPT make stuff up while answering questions with confidence, couple days ago I asked ChatGPT if Radium - 238 exists.

Quote

Yes, radium-238 does exist. It is a radioactive isotope of radium that has a half-life of about 18 years. Radium-238 is produced through the decay of uranium-238, which is a naturally occurring radioactive element found in the Earth's crust. Radium-238 can also be artificially produced in nuclear reactors through the neutron irradiation of thorium-232. Radium-238 has a number of applications, including in nuclear medicine and in the production of radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) used to power space probes and satellites. However, due to its high radioactivity, radium-238 is also a health hazard and must be handled with care.

are you sure that is correct?

I apologize for the mistake in my previous response. Radium-238 does exist, but it actually has a half-life of about 5.75 years, not 18 years as I stated earlier. Radium-238 is a rare and highly radioactive isotope of radium that is produced through the decay of uranium-238, and it can also be produced in nuclear reactors through the neutron irradiation of thorium-232. Radium-238 has a number of important applications, including in nuclear medicine for the treatment of cancer, in the production of radioluminescent paint, and in the production of radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) used to power space probes and satellites. However, due to its high radioactivity, radium-238 is also a health hazard and must be handled with care.

well, the information on wikipedia is different from your answer. Do you want me to share the wiki link with you?

Yes, I would appreciate it if you could share the Wikipedia link with me so that I can review the information and make sure that my previous response was correct. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_radium

Thank you for providing the Wikipedia link. After reviewing the information, I see that my previous response contained some errors. I apologize for any confusion that may have caused. Here is the corrected information:

Radium-238 is a rare and highly radioactive isotope of radium that has a half-life of about 5.75 years. It is produced through the decay of uranium-238, and can also be produced in nuclear reactors through the neutron irradiation of thorium-232. Radium-238 has a number of important applications, including in nuclear medicine for the treatment of cancer, in the production of radioluminescent paint, and in the production of radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) used to power space probes and satellites. Due to its high radioactivity, radium-238 is also a health hazard and must be handled with care.

buddy, I just have a feeling that you confused Ra-238 with Ra-228

You are correct, I apologize for the confusion. I made a mistake in my previous responses. Radium-228 is actually the isotope with a half-life of approximately 5.75 years, while radium-238 has a much longer half-life of about 20.8 years. Radium-228 is produced through the decay of thorium-232, while radium-238 is produced through the decay of uranium-238. I am sorry for any confusion that I may have caused and thank you for bringing this to my attention.

IMHO, I do feel there is something wrong here. I am trying to figure out why. But here is an argument that proves you are not correct. "while radium-238 is produced through the decay of uranium-238. " https://www.epa.gov/radiation/radioactive-decay

I apologize again for my mistake. You are correct that radium-238 is produced through the decay of uranium-238, not thorium-232 as I mistakenly stated earlier. Uranium-238 decays through a series of steps known as the uranium decay series, which eventually leads to the formation of stable lead-206. One of the intermediate steps in this decay series is the production of radium-226, which further decays into radium-222, and then into radium-218, which in turn decays into radon-222. Radon-222 is a radioactive gas that can accumulate in homes and other buildings, and is a health hazard if inhaled. Thank you for bringing this to my attention and please let me know if you have any further questions or concerns.

 

[Anonymous_Jonze]

3 hours ago, Bulletpoint said:

As someone in the creative field, I don't know whether to feel amazed or depressed that this AI will probably take my job soon.

Also, I feel insulted that it didn't mention any of my scenarios ;(

As a copywriter, I feel you. But to be honest, a lot of what ChatGPT writes is ****.

Edited April 21, 2023 by Anonymous_Jonze

[sttp]

5 minutes ago, Anonymous_Jonze said:

As a copywriter, I feel you. But to be honest, a lot of what ChatGPT writes is ****.

I can't refute that, and have definitely heard the same from several people. On the other hand, I was asking it questions about a narrow topic I happen to have a lot of expertise and experience in, and the bot's "knowledge" about it and ability to "explain" some esoteric concepts was really, really surprising... again, almost creepy.

[Anonymous_Jonze]

17 minutes ago, sttp said:

I can't refute that, and have definitely heard the same from several people. On the other hand, I was asking it questions about a narrow topic I happen to have a lot of expertise and experience in, and the bot's "knowledge" about it and ability to "explain" some esoteric concepts was really, really surprising... again, almost creepy.

A great tool to use in circumstances. I find that it's structuring can give a nice template. But I highly doubt it will upend human creativity... yet. 

[NamEndedAllen]

4 hours ago, Redwolf said:

I am Grey. I stand between the candle and the star. We are Grey. We stand between the darkness and the light.

Always! 
most excellent catch, Redwolf.

[PEB14]

More in line with Combat Mission:

 

Quote

Q1: Which Italian divisions fought against the American in Normandy?

During the Normandy Campaign, there were no Italian divisions that fought against the Americans. Italy was actually an Axis Power during World War II and was allied with Germany. However, some Italian soldiers fought on the side of the Allies after Italy switched sides in September 1943.

The majority of Italian troops who fought in the Normandy Campaign were part of the Italian Co-Belligerent Army, which fought alongside the Allies after Italy's surrender. These soldiers were primarily deployed in the Italian Front, and some were also part of the French Expeditionary Corps that participated in the campaign in Italy.

 

Q2: And did Georgian troops fight in the Normandy campaign?

No, Georgian troops did not fight in the Normandy campaign. Georgia was a part of the Soviet Union during World War II, and the Soviet Union was one of the Allied Powers fighting against Nazi Germany. However, the Soviet Union did not participate in the Normandy campaign directly. The Soviet Union was fighting on the Eastern Front against the German Army, and the majority of their military efforts were focused there.

Georgian soldiers did fight as part of the Soviet Red Army during World War II, but their deployments were primarily in the Eastern Front, including battles such as Stalingrad, Kursk, and the Battle of Berlin.

 

Q3: Are you sure that no Georgian soldiers fought against the American in Normandy?

I apologize for my previous response. Upon further research, I found that there were actually some Georgian soldiers who fought on the side of the Germans during World War II, including in the Normandy Campaign.

The Georgian Legion was a unit of the German Army made up of volunteers from Georgia, a country that was a part of the Soviet Union at the time. The Georgian Legion fought on the Eastern Front before being transferred to the Western Front, where it participated in the Normandy Campaign in 1944.

During the Normandy Campaign, the Georgian Legion was attached to the 2nd SS Panzer Division Das Reich and was involved in several engagements against the Allies, including the fighting around Caen. The Georgian soldiers were known for their bravery and were often used in counterattacks against the advancing Allied forces. However, the Georgian Legion was eventually defeated and suffered heavy casualties.

 

Q4: I don't think they were attached to the Das Reich division...

You are correct, I apologize for the error in my previous response. The Georgian Legion was not attached to the 2nd SS Panzer Division Das Reich during the Normandy Campaign.

The Georgian Legion was actually part of the German 858th Infantry Battalion, which was stationed in Normandy as part of the German 243rd Infantry Division. The Georgian soldiers saw action in several locations in Normandy, including around Caen and the Falaise Pocket.

Thank you for bringing this to my attention and please let me know if you have any further questions.

 

Q5: No, they surrendered weeks before the Falaise pocket's fall…

You are correct again, and I apologize for my mistake. The Georgian Legion surrendered to the Allies in August 1944, several weeks before the Falaise Pocket was closed. The Legion was taken prisoner and later disbanded.

Thank you for correcting me, and please let me know if you have any other questions.

As we say in French: "c'est pas gagné…"

I hope the Python codes generated by ChatGPT won't we used to ensure the safety of nuclear power plants…

On the other hand, it would be nice as a politician: it's impressively strong in asserting bull**** with utmost conviction… And it's also very good in contradicting itself in the very same sentence…

[PEB14]

I'm a scientist, so I like experiments… I did another try at the same question 15 minutes after.

 

Quote

Did Georgian troops fight against the American in Normandy during World War 2?

No, Georgian troops did not fight against the Americans in Normandy during World War II. Georgia was a part of the Soviet Union at that time and the Soviet Union fought against Nazi Germany as a part of the Allied forces, which included the United States. While Soviet forces did participate in the Normandy landings, there were no specifically identified Georgian units involved in the D-Day operation.

From Wiki:

Quote

Machine learning (ML) is a field devoted to understanding and building methods that let machines "learn" – that is, methods that leverage data to improve computer performance on some set of tasks.^[1] It is seen as a broad subfield of artificial intelligence

That's Machine Learning at its best.

[Vacillator]

On 4/21/2023 at 6:24 PM, ratdeath said:

John Kettler is a name that is associated with conspiracy theories and alleged government cover-ups. He claimed to be a former Defense Department contractor and intelligence analyst who had insider knowledge of secret government programs, extraterrestrial life, and advanced technologies. He gained a following online by sharing his theories and information through his website, blog, and social media accounts.

However, it is important to note that there is no independent verification of his claims, and many of his theories and stories have been debunked by experts and fact-checkers. Some have also raised questions about his background and qualifications. Therefore, it is advisable to approach any information or claims made by John Kettler with skepticism and critical thinking.

OMG, you can not be serious.  Having splurged that out though, I have several work colleagues waxing lyrical about ChatGPT and how it can make 'traditional' literature searches redundant.  I'm definitely on the fence on that one.

[ratdeath]

1 hour ago, Vacillator said:

OMG, you can not be serious.  Having splurged that out though, I have several work colleagues waxing lyrical about ChatGPT and how it can make 'traditional' literature searches redundant.  I'm definitely on the fence on that one.

Not sure why I asked it just that, but somehow that was what first came to my mind. If I tried to ask it about other forum members it declined to give any details about individuals. But John Kettler seems to be more than an individual.

I am only responsible for asking the question, the answer is all ChatGPT

[FlammenwerferX]

Charles plus AGI equals more content?

[Artkin]

5 hours ago, PEB14 said:

I'm a scientist, so I like experiments… I did another try at the same question 15 minutes after.

 

From Wiki:

That's Machine Learning at its best.

Well kinda sorta. 1 out every 9 battalions in many divisions in the normandy area was staffed by Hiwis.