Jump to content

How Hot is Ukraine Gonna Get?


Probus

Recommended Posts

"Russian and Ukrainian forces are now pitted in fierce street fighting in the suburban towns around the capital. Russian forces greatly outnumber the Ukrainian Army, but the Ukrainians have been ambushing them with Javelin anti-tank missiles supplied by NATO and the United States."

Above is from the New York Times, which I usually like, usually. The mainstream press simply has not been able to absorb the math on the manpower situation. Assuming if you are reading this you have already read Steves excellent analysis. The media/press/conventional wisdom blob just has this wrong, and no amount of proof seems to be getting through. So they will be surprised all over again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Vic4 said:

Given the extreme material losses that the Russians are sustaining, do we know if the Russian military industry is fully mobilized (i.e. cranking out T-14’s, BMP-3’s and training personnel etc. as fast as possible)? Do they have the material resources to keep producing sophisticated equipment or were they stockpiled previously in anticipation of the sanctions? How long can/will Russia sustain a conventional conflict with significant losses until only the “rabid animal in a cage with nukes” option is all that is left…?

T-14s aint gonna save Putin's ass. They're supposedly entering serial production this year. And they're not gonna be rushing it off the conveyor belts into battle - these are complex, pretty cutting edge vehicles. The T14 is no T34.

Missiles could be mass produced relatively quickly but therein lies the rub - relatively. If UKR can weather the coming Russian re-offensive's initial stage, where I suspect they'll go bananas with every damn stand-off/long range weapon they can get their hands on - if UKR can survive that and counter attacks then the well will be dry and the RUS army in UKR will collapse. UKR can kill Russians quicker than the Russians can kill Ukrainians and, as Steve said, there's WAYYYYYYyyyy more Ukrainian fighters.

Ukraine has passed through the first fire, yet a greater inferno awaits. But that test, if passed, will determine the war in their favour. 

Edited by Kinophile
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sburke said:

given the world supply chain issues with chips to the point my buddy has been waiting for a year for the pickup he ordered I'd say the likelihood of Russia turning out masses of electronics hungry vehicles is low.  I am curious even how that impacts everyone but a Jav or NLAW needs a lot less than an armored vehicle/SAM unit/EW unit etc.

I heard a report about this the other day.  Total NATO stocks have many thousands in surplus to send to Ukraine before they have to compromise their own direct needs.  Production of Javelins is something like 2500 a year at the current peacetime run rate.  Which means there are plenty more AT weapons to send to the Ukrainians to take out the exiting Russian vehicles, not to mention the dribble of new production that might leave the factory floor.

4 minutes ago, sburke said:

Steve you forgot all those guys from the VDV who came in on aircraft.. and those couple downed transport aircraft.  I'd be curious to see how the more highly trained units have suffered.  Throwing in poorly trained conscripts to replace their more highly trained units is.. well not a good plan.

I had not forgotten them :)  I sorta lumped them into the "aircraft" number of 500.

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-14 is also an unproven system.  Tell me, dear readers out there in virtual land, what brand new Russian or Soviet system has ever been fielded without there being significant problems that diverge the produced vehicle from the technical specifications? :D Plus what Russian or Soviet system has ever performed as well as the government says it will?

Seriously though, T-14 was supposed to be fielded in large numbers by now.  It hasn't been, so that should tell you something right there.

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Battlefront.com@KinophileSorry, the T14 was a sarcastic citation. Really just asking if Russia's military industry is mobilized; producing whatever "battle ready" hardware and corresponding personnel as fast as bloody possible and if they are committed to a "conventional" approach rather than a chicken little meets dr. evil doomsday solution... 

Edited by Vic4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I took it as sarcasm, but it still was fun to kick the T-14 in the teeth.  I had to put up with a lot of trolls back in 2014 that said that soon NATO would be outclassed and we should all just surrender.  Non-trolls told them they were all nuts for x, y, and z reasons.  Nice to be able to definitively be able to say "we told you so".

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Vic4 said:

Copy. Truly hope that incompetence, corruption and insubordination extends to their nuclear division... 

insubordination yes.  I would hope though that they aren't too incompetent or corrupt.  We have already done enough over the years cleaning up Russia's nuclear mess.  Submarine Dismantlement Assistance - The Nuclear Threat Initiative (nti.org)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Battlefront.com said:

I heard a report about this the other day.  Total NATO stocks have many thousands in surplus to send to Ukraine before they have to compromise their own direct needs.  Production of Javelins is something like 2500 a year at the current peacetime run rate.  Which means there are plenty more AT weapons to send to the Ukrainians to take out the exiting Russian vehicles, not to mention the dribble of new production that might leave the factory floor.

I had not forgotten them :)  I sorta lumped them into the "aircraft" number of 500.

Steve

I suspect many NATO countries would want to donate their stockpile of munitions, especially ones close to their “best used before date” so they can justify getting newer stuff.  It’s probably cheaper donating them than having to responsiblely recycle them following current environmental guidelines. Those East german Strella Manpads …..

Edited by evilcommie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, sburke said:

Steve you forgot all those guys from the VDV who came in on aircraft.. and those couple downed transport aircraft.

Can we stop bringing up the "shot down" transport aircraft loaded with VDV until at least THE FIRST piece of evidence that this actually happened is turned over? Seriously I'm all for being proven wrong--show me the evidence--but I resolutely believe in observing some simple standards about this sort of parroting. Haven't seen any video/pics, remains, flight radar data to support it, obituaries, corroborating witnesses... anything, except for a claim by the group(s) that would stand to gain the most from such a morale victory, particularly in the opening hours of war. Would love to get to the bottom of this "big if true" claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Battlefront.com said:

Russia simply can't win a war of numbers.  Which is why I, and lots of other people, over the past few years have said a full on Russian war against Ukraine would be a national suicide mission.

Steve

Yeah I agree.  This has been my opinion also and caused me to be quite shocked that this even started.  As I posted on another forum, even to me, a half-arsed gamer with a bit of historical knowledge on the other side of the world, invading UKR seemed to be a lose-lose situation.  Doesn't make sense.

My one real hope is that Putin will lose his skin for all the misery he's unleashed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Battlefront.com said:

T-14 is also an unproven system.  Tell me, dear readers out there in virtual land, what brand new Russian or Soviet system has ever been fielded without there being significant problems that diverge the produced vehicle from the technical specifications? :D Plus what Russian or Soviet system has ever performed as well as the government says it will?

Seriously though, T-14 was supposed to be fielded in large numbers by now.  It hasn't been, so that should tell you something right there.

Steve

I bet it heavily relies on western technology (as literally every single thing in Russia down to the toilet paper) and they were supposed to go into the mass production in 2014 but then Russia invaded us, its military sector got screwed and there is only their government claim that a whopping 20 TEST units were delivered to the army in October of last year.

Not to mention that sending T-14 in here with a high chance of it getting snatched by the tractor and suddenly offloaded somewhere in the US is a bad bad idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...