-
Posts
1,186 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
21
Everything posted by Rinaldi
-
CMRT: Observations from the Firing Range
Rinaldi replied to Migo441's topic in Combat Mission Red Thunder
Yeah @shift8 hit the nail on the head with that, words out of my mouth. Even then Ian the infantry aren't reasonably expected to hit much further with great consistency; especially now as most NATO forces are using carbines. Finally, range conditions versus combat conditions... On the personal note one of the main reasons I love the Combat Mission series is because it captures just how much ammo has to be expended in an infantry firefight for casualties to begin mounting. Make no mistake, its still a lot lower than it is in reality, but take it as an acceptable abstract. -
Been going through @SeinfeldRules scenarios; they're all absolutely top notch. From the "Into Lithuania" mission: A Soviet company commander scouts out a position ahead; an ATG is detected and masking fires are called down With smoke coming down, the Company, riding on tanks, moves through a wooded lot to close distance Close-Up From the CO's position
-
Bug in Dropzone Charlie?
Rinaldi replied to StieliAlpha's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
No bug, another scenario has used something similar to simulate an air-raid warning. CW NEDFORCE will tell the German attacker with a false reinforcement message when 'allied planes have been spotted.' Sounds like a similar situation; its a neat trick. The little radio squelch you get with those messages helps enhance the feeling of getting something over comms. -
Where did M36 Jackson store it's removable roof?
Rinaldi replied to Tempestzzzz's topic in Combat Mission Final Blitzkrieg
M36s in game are only the M36 and M36B1, to my knowledge the version with the roof would be the B2; of which less than 300 were converted or produced and shouldn't feature in the time period of the game. Now, as for jury-rigged defenses like chicken wire, not out of the question given all the unique modifications we see on Shermans and similar vehicles from the time period; but is it worth even abstracting for the game? It would be purely cosmetic and hard to justify the effort. -
Which Units / Formations use the M1903A3 Springfield?
Rinaldi replied to pomjon's topic in Combat Mission Fortress Italy
Squad level grenadiers still used them at this time period; you'll see them in the '43 scenarios. -
As already mentioned, they can be towed by jeeps but purchasing them individually as prime movers means you have to dismount the drivers. The Glider/AirLanding (and possibly the Airborne, can't recall) formations for the Allies come with the jeeps by default in the TO&E.
-
CM:BN Screenshot Thread #2
Rinaldi replied to Battlefront.com's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
A smoke grenade, managed to catch it mid flight. From a recently concluded PBEM - I've always liked Glider infantry, especially in choked up terrain like this. I think the streamlined company size is what I appreciate; much like the Rangers in CMFI. -
CM:BN Screenshot Thread #2
Rinaldi replied to Battlefront.com's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
-
Shall try to start an unofficial screenshots thread?
Rinaldi replied to MikeyD's topic in Combat Mission Fortress Italy
From a recently concluded PBEM; Two companies of (largely dismounted) PanzerGrenadiers, supported by a platoon of Panzer IVs take the fight to New Zealand infantry amid irrigation ditches and sunken fields: -
Version 2 released; should be on the Scenario Depot soon. In the meantime you can download it: here. Change-log from original: All German StuGs begin on map now, dug in -- it seems that this is truer-to-life. Adjust German deployment zone; now they shouldn't be able to fire into the open area of the Allied deployment if they deploy weapons forward German artillery (2 x 105 batteries) is available much later than in the previous version, to better simulate the batteries still firing harassing fires at off-map areas. Minor topographic changes Streamlined the Mission briefings, they shouldn't be a chore to read now.
-
CM:BN Screenshot Thread #2
Rinaldi replied to Battlefront.com's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
An old vignette I found in a forgotten folder -- knocking out a bunker that has been flanked. -
Small bug with Rhino fitted tanks
Rinaldi replied to weta_nz's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
Yes, I noticed that. It cost you a Sherman -- if I was in your position I'd be rather miffed. (Sorry for the delay in turns by the way) Hope it gets fixed soon. -
Unofficial Screenshots & Videos Thread
Rinaldi replied to agusto's topic in Combat Mission Black Sea
-
-
This is unacceptable.
Rinaldi replied to 5th SS Div Wiking's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
W E W L A D E W L A D I bet you this guy would come running back if there was an Orodour-sur-Glane "battle" pack. Good riddance. -
comic Rundstedt Sends His Best - a CMFB Comic AAR
Rinaldi replied to Bud Backer's topic in Combat Mission Final Blitzkrieg
Lipsmacking. -
BETA AAR- Spoiler- Discussion Thread
Rinaldi replied to vincere's topic in Combat Mission Final Blitzkrieg
Its frustration, a totally human reaction, especially when you know you are talented. If only Baneman knew he got in Bil's head with those last couple of turns -
BETA AAR- Spoiler- Discussion Thread
Rinaldi replied to vincere's topic in Combat Mission Final Blitzkrieg
That or spalling from the .50 being hit. Rough luck for Bil, normally that usually only causes light wounding if that on the unbuttoned commander, at least in my experience. Then again, you don't take fire from 128mms in Normandy. -
BETA AAR- Spoiler- Discussion Thread
Rinaldi replied to vincere's topic in Combat Mission Final Blitzkrieg
That's what I read at first as well, but I think Bil actually said: Bil's had a rough few turns; his usual aggression pays off nine times out of ten but it seems like he played his cards too soon this time. -
CM:BN Screenshot Thread #2
Rinaldi replied to Battlefront.com's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
You wound me; are you sure they couldn't ambush with their prime mover so close? I think my opponent disagrees with that assessment Of course, PaK guns don't operate alone, and the Shermans that try to 'lean on' it are opened up on by a second gun: Of course, because it never dawned on that gun crew to move the halftrack, they are now able to make a speedy egress to a new firing position under the cover of the rest of the PaK-Front -
CM:BN Screenshot Thread #2
Rinaldi replied to Battlefront.com's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
Thanks. -
CM:BN Screenshot Thread #2
Rinaldi replied to Battlefront.com's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
Some screenshots from a scenario I've made, we're at the half-way mark in the battle and its been quite energetic. The 3 and 15 PzGrenadiers were freshly arrived from Italy for the Battle of Nancy and still wore their Italian theater attire. The battle in the Moselle bridgehead was notable for the high amount of armor support afforded to the Germans - at least 10 StuGs, possibly even 15, to the lead battalion. Most of the fighting in the town is being done by 2 platoons of infantry with the better part of a tank company. On the flank the second tank company is too busy contending with the newly-arrived StuGs to shell the town from different angles. I was hoping to cut the road the StuGs were to arrive on before they made it, but from a design perspective I'm glad that wasn't possible in the time allotted. A 76mm threads the needle and shoots high, drat. The StuGs don't miss, but the entire 76 crew survives and legs it to safety. The rest of the Company is on the way, with smoke covering their flank.