Jump to content

Sidearms, what do you look for.


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

A lot of people swear by the Type II Phaser, but I really don't like it. It's bulky, doesn't fit my hand right, and I really don't like how the power pack attaches to the base. I'm always afraid that if I hit the phaser on the side of a door as I come through it, I'll end up facing the bad guys with just a power pack in my fist! Plus, for the weight of one Type II Phaser, you can carry 3-4 Type I's. It's easy to hold one in each hand and have two on your belt for back up. I even know people (well, really just one guy) who use Type I's as key fobs. (I don't though; I've always been afraid of accidentally vaporizing my car while trying to unlock it in a dark parking garage.)

The Type II does have more power, but the Type I can disintegrate a man with no problem at all common ranges - and really, who needs more power than that?

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by dalem:

You could carry a satchel of Type Is - just twist the little knob on top for the overload setting and lob them like grenades.

-dale

Yes, Type I's are very flexible, especially if you buy the mail-order aftermarket kit that eliminates the loud overload warning. Still, though, I'd hate to blow up my living room.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

HK USP in .40 S&W is my personal favorite.

I also love shooting Desert Eagle in .50 AE. I have unusually large hands which makes it easier to not get hit in the head with spent brass. My sister likes shooting Desert Eagle as well.

However, I think the best sidearm is a BlasTech DL-44, you know, the blaster pistol Han Solo uses. That thing is sweet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by dalem:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Nidan1:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by dalem:

Sidearm if I needed to carry a full-size handgun? My Steyr M9 - looks like a ray gun and fits like a dream. I shoot it well. For me.

Sidearm I shoot best? My buddy's CZ-75 in 9mm. I don't think I can miss with this gun, and I'm not that good a shot - the bullets just go where you want them to.

-dale

You mean like the Gun Gene Simmons used in "Runaway" </font>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My philosophy is, I prefer a little overkill. 9mm is a bullet, and it'll do the things that bullets do. .45ACP starts up 1/10" or so wider, and also expands a bit more iirc. So it gives you that much more of a chance to hit something vital enough to produce a stop.

If someone prefers 9mm, I can't really tell them they're picking something inferior per se (other than, of course, noting the larger diameter.) I still prefer having all the % I can on my side, though.

Before someone says "Well shoot them 5 more times with your extra ammo!", sometimes you don't have the time to pull the trigger 5 extra times. Also, just remember: Cop or Joe shmoe defending your home or life, you are MORALLY and LEGALLY responsible for where any misses go. I think I could hit someone in rapid fire at anything under 10 yards without a miss, but I've practiced a hell of a lot. You need to, too, if that's going to be your plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why wouldnt you call a veterinary?
Cost is a major reason. This isn't putting your dog to sleep. You can't get rid of an old horse by selling it to a slaughter house since congress passed the stupid bill shutting them down.

So you have an animal you purchased for 500-1000 dollars 15-20 years ago (or it was given to you). It is dieing and a vet will charge for the house call and then will charge for the medicine which is probably more than the horse was worth. This also does not include death sentences such as a broken leg, cancer or a few other conditions where a vet is useless.

I do admit I have a bias for the .45 vs. 9mm. The fact the .45 came out to combat muslim extremists in the Phillipines because the .38 lacked enough power is good reason. I have heard 40% of gunfights are within 8ft, 80% are within 21 feet (FBI statistics supposedly, but can't verify a definitive source). A former policeman told me the average of gunfight had only 2 rounds fired. So I don't need the rounds unless I am shooting wildly in most cases.

So I want a pistol that has enough rounds (5-7 is plenty though I have seen 14 rounds for certain pistols), an extra clip, enough stopping power for man or beast and a weapon I like to shoot. Also the .45 round tends to go subsonic so silencers can be used if needed without losing its effect. So that is why I favor a .45. I like the .357 revolver because of a revolver's reliability (a round won't fire then just go the next chamber).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by MiB:

My philosophy is, I prefer a little overkill. 9mm is a bullet, and it'll do the things that bullets do. .45ACP starts up 1/10" or so wider, and also expands a bit more iirc. So it gives you that much more of a chance to hit something vital enough to produce a stop.

If someone prefers 9mm, I can't really tell them they're picking something inferior per se (other than, of course, noting the larger diameter.) I still prefer having all the % I can on my side, though.

Before someone says "Well shoot them 5 more times with your extra ammo!", sometimes you don't have the time to pull the trigger 5 extra times. Also, just remember: Cop or Joe shmoe defending your home or life, you are MORALLY and LEGALLY responsible for where any misses go. I think I could hit someone in rapid fire at anything under 10 yards without a miss, but I've practiced a hell of a lot. You need to, too, if that's going to be your plan.

I would note that basing lethality predictions on calibre is shaky ground, as far as small-arms go. There are plenty of accounts of people still geting up after being hit by rifle or machine gun fire, and those pack vastly more energy and effect compared to a pistol. Of course, the plural of anecdote is not data, but the data suggests that, if you want your target to go down and stay down, that the shotgun is the preferred option. If you don't have time to pull a trigger on a semi-automatic weapon five times, then you have no time to do anything. The only sure stops are hits to the central nervous system, with any pistol.

Equally, that doesn't make the 9mm any better than the .45. Go with what you like and can use. And be aware of what it means to use it before you have to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...