Bigduke,
When did you get out of law school?
Obviously different environmental variables will be in place for any number of different situations. But as a GENERAL rule of thumb, the chances of dying while flying a helicopter full of fuel and explosives, high enough off the ground that the fall would kill you, and when people are shooting at you and want to drag your corpse through their streets, are significantly better than, say, sitting on your ass in front of your computer.
These increased odds of dying would have an affect on any human. But these videos show, without a shadow of a doubt, clear, comprehensive and irrefutable evidence, that these pilots are highly capable of scoring a high percentage of direct hits. Every rocket attack in CMSF is shot across the map. This would be great if we could call a linear rocket attack. Also, many of the pilots fighting this Syrian War would be highly experienced veterans. I agree with almost everything else. My vote is for more accurate rockets from helos.
Idea: let the scenario designer decide just how accurate the pilots get to be. This would simulate enemy air defenses and pilot braveness according to the situation the scenario designer is trying to portray.
[ June 13, 2008, 11:53 PM: Message edited by: the Fighting Seabee ]