Schmoly War Posted July 6, 2007 Share Posted July 6, 2007 Which specific red vs red real life scenarios/operations do you guys see feasible with the current equipment list and geographical location? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panzermartin Posted July 6, 2007 Share Posted July 6, 2007 Afghanistan, Iran-Iraq, Chechenya, even Arab Israeli wars with some imagination. What would be the equivalent of a M-60? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Shaw Posted July 6, 2007 Share Posted July 6, 2007 I see this as a huge problem. If BFC hasn't modelled safe sex then Red vd. Red is a VERY likely possibility and could hurt the sale of the game among Native Americans. Joe 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speedy Posted July 6, 2007 Share Posted July 6, 2007 You're supposed to be away! How can we party and trash the place if you keep poking your head back in here? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pad152 Posted July 6, 2007 Share Posted July 6, 2007 RED vs Red sounds good to me, I just wish BFC would model the other major players in the middleast. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cpl Steiner Posted July 6, 2007 Share Posted July 6, 2007 India v Pakistan is the best Red v Red scenario IMHO. A future mechanized conflict that brings the countries to the brink of nuclear war would be very interesting to wargame. If war broke out, it is predicted by analysts that most of the fighting would take place on the flat plains of the Punjab, the region bordering the two countries, rather than in Kashmir, which is too mountainous for major military operations. Lahore, the capital of Punjab on the Pakistani side, has a climate similar to that of the Middle-East and would almost certainly be the target of Indian attacks in such a conflict. Such a battle shouldn't be too difficult to represent in CM:SF. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benpark Posted July 6, 2007 Share Posted July 6, 2007 To complicate things a bit, is Red AND blue vs. Red possible? It would be interesting to simulate something like Iraqi post Saddam army along with US forces vs insurgent fighters. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergei Posted July 6, 2007 Share Posted July 6, 2007 See the other thread, it's on page one. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Becket Posted July 6, 2007 Share Posted July 6, 2007 All this just made me realize what fun Blue v. Blue will be after the Marine, Brit and German modules are out (they are doing Germans, weren't they?). I'd also pay good money for modules that - if they contained nothing else - contained modern Chinese and Russian forces. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cpl Steiner Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 Originally posted by Becket: All this just made me realize what fun Blue v. Blue will be after the Marine, Brit and German modules are out (they are doing Germans, weren't they?).I have to disagree here. Red v Red could represent credible real-war opponents. Blue v Blue, even with Marine, Brit or German additions, could only ever represent some form of NATO training exercise - unless you are seriously suggesting that the US attack Britain or Germany! I know it's only a game but I'd still rather simulate a real conflict rather than an exercise. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denwad Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 yeah you know the US invasion of syria that CMSF is modeled after... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speedy Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 Yep that's why so many of us are looking forward to the red on red, as well as all the Iraq scenarios that will soon flood the internet. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exel Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 Originally posted by Cpl Steiner: I have to disagree here. Red v Red could represent credible real-war opponents. Blue v Blue, even with Marine, Brit or German additions, could only ever represent some form of NATO training exercise - unless you are seriously suggesting that the US attack Britain or Germany! I know it's only a game but I'd still rather simulate a real conflict rather than an exercise. Only that, you know, there are other countries using Western equipment as well. Egypt and Saudi Arabia for instance both have Abrams, Jordania has Challengers, Turkey has Leopards... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Londoner Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 Don't forget the Eritrean - Ethiopian conflict. Red v red will definately be the most exciting config in my humble opinion..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schmoly War Posted July 7, 2007 Author Share Posted July 7, 2007 What attracted me to alot of the cmx1 scens/operations were the carefully researched ones. I myself am looking at what is called "Little Stalingrad" Komsomolskoye, in Chechnya. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Komsomolskoye Whatever geographical information ive found is very scarce. Does anyone have specific researched material regarding this battle? Or just unique material on the chechen wars in general. Maps and Osprey style 3d information seems very hard to come by here. I reckon its the same thing with any african wars or Iran/iraq 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exel Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 There's also Finland-Russia (pre-2004) to be fought Red vs Red, if there is going to be suitable terrain for it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Becket Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 Originally posted by Cpl Steiner: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Becket: All this just made me realize what fun Blue v. Blue will be after the Marine, Brit and German modules are out (they are doing Germans, weren't they?).I have to disagree here. Red v Red could represent credible real-war opponents. Blue v Blue, even with Marine, Brit or German additions, could only ever represent some form of NATO training exercise - unless you are seriously suggesting that the US attack Britain or Germany! I know it's only a game but I'd still rather simulate a real conflict rather than an exercise. </font> 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axel Posted July 8, 2007 Share Posted July 8, 2007 Originally posted by Becket: All this just made me realize what fun Blue v. Blue will be after the Marine, Brit and German modules are out (they are doing Germans, weren't they?). I'd also pay good money for modules that - if they contained nothing else - contained modern Chinese and Russian forces. Yeah WW2 with modern weapons wohoo! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sequoia Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.