Jump to content

Sequoia

Members
  • Posts

    3,610
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Sequoia

  • Birthday 10/31/1959

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location:
    Tulare County California

Converted

  • Location
    Tulare County California
  • Interests
    everything
  • Occupation
    Boring

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Sequoia's Achievements

Senior Member

Senior Member (3/3)

397

Reputation

  1. Agreed Canada and most other NATO members could and should do more. But these guys below should show that Canada indeed was and is part of NATO. Fallen Canadian Armed Forces Members - Canada in Afghanistan - Canadian Armed Forces - History - Remembrance - Veterans Affairs Canada
  2. Hasn't this theory been discussed to death already in this thread like two years ago?
  3. Elvis provided an answer in the Black Sea forums, as this thread apparently was started in three different forums. I haven't had a chance to post this for a while, but Hi Mom! * * FYI forum old timers will recognize this as meme on these forums meaning this thread will soon be locked, and has no intention of insulting anyone's mother, which someone took it to mean once.
  4. How much better will this be (if any) over current equipment?
  5. In a way I can't say I blame the "Internationalist" such as Merkel and Clinton, and even George (I have seen his soul through his eyes ) W. for the idea that bringing China and Russia fully into the world markets would convince them that there's more money to be made that way than in conquest. First of all it's true. The status quo coalition the Captain talked about a few pages back, was making most countries rich. Yes, some countries slower than others, as some were at the trickle-down end of it all. And again, corruption in many countries ensured only a small percentage of the population were benefiting in others. But overall the system worked about as well as could be found in history. Integrating China and Russia into the status que coalition seemed logical. The flaw I think is dictators are never content with cooperation. The world is always a zero sum game for them. Putin in particular had fantasies about righting wrongs and Russian natural rights to certain lands as part of its Empire that Western leaders missed picking up on.
  6. Russia is the world's biggest country in size and 9th in population. It had and has all the potential to be a great country- one of the world's greatest. A one paragraph (and therefore over-simplified) version of why it I think it made the wrong choices was there was too much corruption in its leadership, and its population had never known anything else. And its leadership was butt-hurt by not being giving the respect they thought they deserved being a superpower that "voluntarily" disbanded, but "merely" that of other major European powers such as Germany or France.
  7. If I may ask, Russia has been going around the world recruiting people as troops and often using them as canon fodder. Ukraine, to its credit (afaik) has not. Is this decision for international public relations, military (such troops are unreliable), economic (we have better uses for the money), or something else?
  8. Damn you Jon Stewart! It will be years before I'll be able to eat a bagel again!
  9. Might Putin think capturing towns such as Avdiivka, despite fierce Ukrainian resistance, will break Ukrainian will (which even the Captain posited as a hypothetical).
  10. I think we both agree that far too many politicians have and continue to put their own ambition and status above the good of the country. I strongly suspect a strong streak of vanity and desire for power are necessary qualities one needs to enter into politics.
  11. No, Kraft had it right. He said that rat of Ron's , not that rat Ron. I made the same mistake myself at first.
  12. I agree M. Johnson is a poor representative of and for the US public. I also think he owes his current speakership to the Freedom (for only people like us) Caucus. But deep down, I have a hunch he and many like him feel about the Orange one like that line in the Night Moves- that is "I used her, she used me and neither one cared," and will dump him and do the right thing on Ukraine once he becomes irrelevant, which I'm thinking may be well before the November election. Johnson has to appear just reluctant enough to for now keep his job (though like McCarthy he'll probably lose it anyway) .
  13. C This is an oversimplified answer but, it's because the Speaker won't let the vote come to the floor. Yes, there are ways it can be forced, but those GOPers who did force it would be severely punished by the party for not toeing the line.. I agree that's more than a bit cowardly, BUT, I think it the GOPers supporting the aid are counting on the speaker letting it come to a floor vote relatively soon (and I think they're right). There's more than a little theatre going on here. p.s. Ninja's by Sburke
  14. I think it's a mistake to label it as the GOP blocking it. I would say it's the more like MAGA's outside influence blocking it, but even that's an oversimplification. Perhaps I'm repeating what's already been said, but with the tiny GOP majority every GOP speaker is afraid of being ousted by one outspoken House member, as McCarthy was. In effect the GOP house is just as weak, if not weaker than the Biden Administration. Anyway, it looks as if Matt Gaetz, who called for Mcarthy's removal might be joining George Santos on being booted from Congress.
×
×
  • Create New...