Jump to content

slippy

Members
  • Posts

    204
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Reputation Activity

  1. Upvote
    slippy got a reaction from Daveoreno in Update on Engine 4 patches   
    i have said it before and i understand a lot of people do not agree, but their public relations absolutely sucks 
  2. Upvote
    slippy got a reaction from LukeFF in Update on Engine 4 patches   
    i have said it before and i understand a lot of people do not agree, but their public relations absolutely sucks 
  3. Like
    slippy got a reaction from DzrtFox in Update on Engine 4 patches   
    i have said it before and i understand a lot of people do not agree, but their public relations absolutely sucks 
  4. Upvote
    slippy got a reaction from Aragorn2002 in European Union Army   
    Aragorn, please do not quote the Guardian as actual fact mate. It is a leftist - Liberal paper that is very Pro-Europe, and biased to a certain point of view.
     
    This discussion could go on and on, so i will say my goodbyes to it now, as we are going off track, with regards the original question. All i would like to say is that your posts single out particular countries, for example the UK and US, for criticism. If you are going to do this in a public forum then you will get reactions opposing your views. Is Britain the perfect country with an unblemished record? Absolutely not. Is any country perfect? Britain is my country of which i am very proud, as you and others quite rightly will be of yours, and therefore i will not stand by and see people slate it based on their own perceived perceptions of it.
    If you check any of my posts, you will see that i do not make personal remarks on an others country, it is not my place to do so, and i am aware that i am not armed with the full facts, all that i would ask is that you pay me and others the same courtesy. Have your views by all means, but think before you post.
    cheers
     
    slippy
  5. Upvote
    slippy got a reaction from MOS:96B2P in European Union Army   
    Aragorn, please do not quote the Guardian as actual fact mate. It is a leftist - Liberal paper that is very Pro-Europe, and biased to a certain point of view.
     
    This discussion could go on and on, so i will say my goodbyes to it now, as we are going off track, with regards the original question. All i would like to say is that your posts single out particular countries, for example the UK and US, for criticism. If you are going to do this in a public forum then you will get reactions opposing your views. Is Britain the perfect country with an unblemished record? Absolutely not. Is any country perfect? Britain is my country of which i am very proud, as you and others quite rightly will be of yours, and therefore i will not stand by and see people slate it based on their own perceived perceptions of it.
    If you check any of my posts, you will see that i do not make personal remarks on an others country, it is not my place to do so, and i am aware that i am not armed with the full facts, all that i would ask is that you pay me and others the same courtesy. Have your views by all means, but think before you post.
    cheers
     
    slippy
  6. Upvote
    slippy got a reaction from MOS:96B2P in European Union Army   
    Don't agree with that at all sorry. I think the issue with Britain is that we are an Island nation, and on the fringes so to speak, therefore a large portion of Brits have never felt any real affinity to Europe as a whole or certainly not the same as mainland Europeans feel towards each other. That is not the same as not interested. A large part of our trade and business is with Europe so of course we are interested, we would be stupid not to be. As regards 'weaken it for their own political games' which is a broad statement, where are your facts?
     
    Also you mention 'Same goes for  Britain of course.We may not like each other, but in the dangerous times ahead everybody will need allies.' you have made it clear from your statement that you do not like us, but where again is the proof to the contrary?
     
     
    para, i agree with your statement, but more wanted to leave, so leave we must for the sake of Democracy. I voted to leave, but it is not to do with any 'hatred' of Europe. It is purely down to regaining sovereignty, and making our elected politicians responsible for their actions. Also i think the European Union (politicians not the people of Europe) are way to Bureaucratic, the system is bloated and self serving.
    For some of the above reasons that is why i think a European Army would be a bad thing, if it meant you would not have your own standing Army. The bureaucracy you would need to go through to get any meaningful decision for deployment would be so long winded as to make it virtually useless, when you need to get all member states on board. Look at recent wars such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria. Europe has been far from unified on any response.
     
     
     
  7. Upvote
    slippy got a reaction from MOS:96B2P in European Union Army   
    😂😂 Always liked Alan B'stard, very funny. However even though you may draw some comparisons you must remember it was a comedy sketch right? You can't tell me there are no comedy sketches from Europe or anywhere else that  take the piss out of Britain in much the same way? Especially since the Brexit debacle and the way it is being handled by our politicians.
    yes your right, there has always existed those in the Tory Party who have wanted to leave Europe, and successive Tory Prime Ministers have attempted to solve this recurring issue time and again with no success. You will find though that most if not all European countries have Euro skeptic parties so it is by no means a British Trait.
    But the quote was Britain attempts to 'weaken' Europe, i still do not see how? Demanding concessions does not weaken them, that is just the political game.
     
    Please you should not mistake the want for sovereignty to be anti European. 
  8. Like
    slippy reacted to sttp in Update on Engine 4 patches   
    Another view is to flip this around and ask why wouldn't they have been working on the patch this whole time?
    It's been 2 years and 3 months now since they broke some pretty fundamental parts of their own game -- broken to the point that many people can barely enjoy the typical stock scenario. And not just one title broken, but all of them.
    When the issues with v4 were first brought to light, I would have never believed that it'd still be almost literally years before we saw them fixed.
    Perhaps Battlefront needs to start actually paying more testers and content creators, in order to get things moving along, instead of relying on the generosity of so many volunteers?
    I've defended Battlefront and heaped praise on the game many times over the past 4 to 5 years, but at some point a customer's patience and good will just gets used up.
    "Niche market" is no excuse for a fix to the underlying game engine to have taken this long.
  9. Upvote
    slippy got a reaction from MOS:96B2P in Realism Suggestions?   
    thanks mos, i had not heard of peregrines rules before, they do look very comprehensive i must say.
     
    cheers
     
    slipper
  10. Like
    slippy got a reaction from Mord in Reshade 4.0.2 Primer   
    Yes thanks also Mord, for a great user guide mate. Appreciated 😉
  11. Upvote
    slippy got a reaction from Ghost of Charlemagne in They meant september of next year!   
    Yes you can guess all you want, if you like mate. But you won't find out. Which is kind of the point some are trying to make. It's not about enlightenment, its about common, decent, customer care. That's all. One post every month or similar would pay massive dividends in the long run, and do more for sales than the 5 minutes lost working on the game to post it ever would.
     
     
  12. Upvote
    slippy got a reaction from Ghost of Charlemagne in They meant september of next year!   
    Totally agree. Its not the first time this issue has been raised. Its nothing to do with when the game/patches or whatever actually get released. Its just down to the total lack of communication between customer and business. If you want people to pay good money for something you are supplying, then good business sense suggests you should, at the very least, have some dialogue.
     
  13. Upvote
    slippy got a reaction from sfhand in They meant september of next year!   
    maybe i worded it wrong. what i was meaning to say was this.
    BF are hard at work, i assume, trying to complete the game, in order that it may become available for them to sell to us for profit.
    Whilst carrying out that work, you notice that there are disgruntled posts on the forum about finnish dates, lack of communication etc.
    do you :-
    a) take 5 minutes out of your work to post a reassuring explanation, keep your customers happy and onside, and get back to work?
    or
    b) completely ignore any posts and let  customers argue back and fore against or in support of BF?
     
    both options could, i have no basis on that your correct, affect sales and your business PR. Option a) can surely only have a positive outcome, whilst that of b) is negative.
    Is it worth 5 minutes of time to give your business a positive boost? I would say yes.
     
    p.s i took 5 mins out of my day to post this
     
  14. Upvote
    slippy got a reaction from tpr in They meant september of next year!   
    maybe i worded it wrong. what i was meaning to say was this.
    BF are hard at work, i assume, trying to complete the game, in order that it may become available for them to sell to us for profit.
    Whilst carrying out that work, you notice that there are disgruntled posts on the forum about finnish dates, lack of communication etc.
    do you :-
    a) take 5 minutes out of your work to post a reassuring explanation, keep your customers happy and onside, and get back to work?
    or
    b) completely ignore any posts and let  customers argue back and fore against or in support of BF?
     
    both options could, i have no basis on that your correct, affect sales and your business PR. Option a) can surely only have a positive outcome, whilst that of b) is negative.
    Is it worth 5 minutes of time to give your business a positive boost? I would say yes.
     
    p.s i took 5 mins out of my day to post this
     
  15. Upvote
    slippy got a reaction from tpr in They meant september of next year!   
    I don't want to get into a tit-for-tat argument.
    Maybe i am missing something obvious, if so excuse me, but i can see no mention of a release date on the store page
    re-read my post a few times, and i still can't see where i said that either.
     
    My gripe is simply down to what i believe is piss poor customer communication for a $120.00 (discounted mind!) full game. No other issues
  16. Upvote
    slippy got a reaction from Vikingo in They meant september of next year!   
    Totally agree. Its not the first time this issue has been raised. Its nothing to do with when the game/patches or whatever actually get released. Its just down to the total lack of communication between customer and business. If you want people to pay good money for something you are supplying, then good business sense suggests you should, at the very least, have some dialogue.
     
  17. Upvote
    slippy got a reaction from Ghost of Charlemagne in The patch?   
    I totally agree with some of the posts above, taking all things into consideration it surely would not hurt battlefront to just post a quick update once a month or something similar. It would not take a lot of time and would do countless good for their customer relations. At the moment it all seems a bit one sided, battlefront hold all the cards and we, the customer just have to wait until they deem necessary for any updates etc, in my opinion that is not how a company should behave in this day and age, it should be a two-way street of input/output so that customer and provider feel they are both benefiting in some way.
     
    Add into this the changed AI behavior that has made many scenarios/campaigns unplayable, and therefore the reluctance of users to create more content until this is fixed. All of these things add up to put battlefront in a poor light, with time users will grow tired and look elsewhere, and that would be a shame for all of us.
     
    All we are asking for is a little communication!
     
    regards and hopeful, slipper
  18. Like
    slippy got a reaction from BodyBag in The patch?   
    I totally agree with some of the posts above, taking all things into consideration it surely would not hurt battlefront to just post a quick update once a month or something similar. It would not take a lot of time and would do countless good for their customer relations. At the moment it all seems a bit one sided, battlefront hold all the cards and we, the customer just have to wait until they deem necessary for any updates etc, in my opinion that is not how a company should behave in this day and age, it should be a two-way street of input/output so that customer and provider feel they are both benefiting in some way.
     
    Add into this the changed AI behavior that has made many scenarios/campaigns unplayable, and therefore the reluctance of users to create more content until this is fixed. All of these things add up to put battlefront in a poor light, with time users will grow tired and look elsewhere, and that would be a shame for all of us.
     
    All we are asking for is a little communication!
     
    regards and hopeful, slipper
  19. Upvote
    slippy got a reaction from Txema in The patch?   
    I totally agree with some of the posts above, taking all things into consideration it surely would not hurt battlefront to just post a quick update once a month or something similar. It would not take a lot of time and would do countless good for their customer relations. At the moment it all seems a bit one sided, battlefront hold all the cards and we, the customer just have to wait until they deem necessary for any updates etc, in my opinion that is not how a company should behave in this day and age, it should be a two-way street of input/output so that customer and provider feel they are both benefiting in some way.
     
    Add into this the changed AI behavior that has made many scenarios/campaigns unplayable, and therefore the reluctance of users to create more content until this is fixed. All of these things add up to put battlefront in a poor light, with time users will grow tired and look elsewhere, and that would be a shame for all of us.
     
    All we are asking for is a little communication!
     
    regards and hopeful, slipper
  20. Like
    slippy got a reaction from Bulletpoint in The patch?   
    I totally agree with some of the posts above, taking all things into consideration it surely would not hurt battlefront to just post a quick update once a month or something similar. It would not take a lot of time and would do countless good for their customer relations. At the moment it all seems a bit one sided, battlefront hold all the cards and we, the customer just have to wait until they deem necessary for any updates etc, in my opinion that is not how a company should behave in this day and age, it should be a two-way street of input/output so that customer and provider feel they are both benefiting in some way.
     
    Add into this the changed AI behavior that has made many scenarios/campaigns unplayable, and therefore the reluctance of users to create more content until this is fixed. All of these things add up to put battlefront in a poor light, with time users will grow tired and look elsewhere, and that would be a shame for all of us.
     
    All we are asking for is a little communication!
     
    regards and hopeful, slipper
  21. Upvote
    slippy got a reaction from kch001 in The patch?   
    I totally agree with some of the posts above, taking all things into consideration it surely would not hurt battlefront to just post a quick update once a month or something similar. It would not take a lot of time and would do countless good for their customer relations. At the moment it all seems a bit one sided, battlefront hold all the cards and we, the customer just have to wait until they deem necessary for any updates etc, in my opinion that is not how a company should behave in this day and age, it should be a two-way street of input/output so that customer and provider feel they are both benefiting in some way.
     
    Add into this the changed AI behavior that has made many scenarios/campaigns unplayable, and therefore the reluctance of users to create more content until this is fixed. All of these things add up to put battlefront in a poor light, with time users will grow tired and look elsewhere, and that would be a shame for all of us.
     
    All we are asking for is a little communication!
     
    regards and hopeful, slipper
  22. Upvote
    slippy got a reaction from Rinaldi in The patch?   
    I totally agree with some of the posts above, taking all things into consideration it surely would not hurt battlefront to just post a quick update once a month or something similar. It would not take a lot of time and would do countless good for their customer relations. At the moment it all seems a bit one sided, battlefront hold all the cards and we, the customer just have to wait until they deem necessary for any updates etc, in my opinion that is not how a company should behave in this day and age, it should be a two-way street of input/output so that customer and provider feel they are both benefiting in some way.
     
    Add into this the changed AI behavior that has made many scenarios/campaigns unplayable, and therefore the reluctance of users to create more content until this is fixed. All of these things add up to put battlefront in a poor light, with time users will grow tired and look elsewhere, and that would be a shame for all of us.
     
    All we are asking for is a little communication!
     
    regards and hopeful, slipper
  23. Like
    slippy got a reaction from JSj in The patch?   
    I totally agree with some of the posts above, taking all things into consideration it surely would not hurt battlefront to just post a quick update once a month or something similar. It would not take a lot of time and would do countless good for their customer relations. At the moment it all seems a bit one sided, battlefront hold all the cards and we, the customer just have to wait until they deem necessary for any updates etc, in my opinion that is not how a company should behave in this day and age, it should be a two-way street of input/output so that customer and provider feel they are both benefiting in some way.
     
    Add into this the changed AI behavior that has made many scenarios/campaigns unplayable, and therefore the reluctance of users to create more content until this is fixed. All of these things add up to put battlefront in a poor light, with time users will grow tired and look elsewhere, and that would be a shame for all of us.
     
    All we are asking for is a little communication!
     
    regards and hopeful, slipper
  24. Upvote
    slippy got a reaction from JM Stuff in CMFB - Building Mods   
    No, me neither.
     
    Maybe on about this mod, winter bulge.
    i think part of it contains buildings
×
×
  • Create New...