Marwek77 aka Red Reporter

This i call finished product

There is topic here What I Think Should be Added for Future Modules in CM:BS ne need to start new one...

No LWR is on vehicles and when you call for precision fire with laser designator, it set LASER WARNING on. If you lase vehicle with another tank or atgm it puts defensive smoke, but when lased with laser designator nothing happens except warning. ZALA can activate LWR on vehicles without laser designator? How to do it?

I agree with you Mr. Kettler, but all these were Czechoslovakian tanks. Since 1993 we have Czech Republic and Slovak Republic. And since then we have 2 states with 2 armies. So when pointing to this period of history Czechoslovakia should be used from 1945 until 1992. All unique weapons in this period like: attack rifle Sa vz.58 and Scorpion vz.61, machine gun vz.59, 122mm rocket launcher vz.70/85, aircraft Aero L-29 Dolphine and Aero L-39 Albatros, IFV OT-90 and OT-64 SKOT, 152mm SPH vz.77 DANA, T55 AM2 Dyna-1 upgrade, transport vehicles TATRA, etc., all these were unique designs developed and used in Czechoslovakian Army. Today both armies still use some of them. And also are developing and building some new weapons. For example Czech attack rifle CZ 805 Bren 1 and BREN 2. When i served in Slovak army i have seen T55 with Kladivo, but we trained with T-72 tanks. I was BMP-1 commander so we trained some cooperation with tanks. But as conscript that time it was nothing really big.

I know now why the FO had no radio! Screenshot was done in a moment when they were too far for handsignals and radio contact was not yet established, see pictures... HQ is close enough still... HQ not so close anymore... HQ too far, but radio connection not established yet... Hey can you here me? So possible bug is only unability for BTR-80 1V152 to call precision fire from hull down position...

Just testing every russian vehicle to find what can i do against the Evil Murican Players

I can confirm that other too artillery observation vehicles can call precision fire in hull down position. Call time for veterans is 6 minutes. PRP-4M has radar, so it can see all the time, check the picture with the smoke! It can call precision fire under smoke cover in hull down! Goood!

BTR-80 1V152 in hull down position cannot call precision arty, laser designator cannot see targets probably... Also why the call time is same for vehicle and for forward observer team? In this example both 6 minutes. I thought, that to use electronics in the vehicle can speed it up, but not that case... Why? Also why forward observed has no radio and no connection to HQ?

The Czechoslovakian made FCS is KLADIVO, in english Hammer... just one letter more there Mr. Kettler

BMP-2M has following ammo: 30mm HE x 250 for AGS-17 - finaly i have seen it in action, vehicle use it when main ammo depleted, but very bad accuracy 30mm HE-I x 340 for main gun - vehicle use it against infantry behind cover, but not so good results 30mm APFSDS x 160 for main gun - vehicle use it against enemy IFV, when all Kornets depleted it use it against tank too AT-14 Kornet ATGM x 4 in 2 doble tube launchers - main weapon against tanks, quite good 7,62x54R x 500 for coax BTT-82A has better ammo: 30mm APHE x 150 for main gun - very good against infantry even in cover, airburst... i wish same ammo could be in BMP-2M! 30mm APFSDS x 150 for main gun - vehicle use it against enemy IFV 7,62x54R x 500 for coax So i expected more from AGS-17 in BMP-2M, because it has quite problems with infantry behind walls for example... stationery AGS fire more and more accurate... why?

If the attack goes too well... maybe its a trap

The missile has semi-automatic command-to-line-of-sight (SACLOS) laser beamriding guidance, flying along the line of sight to engage the target head on in a direct attack profile. So no troubles with wire-guidance.

Yes I tried target, target light, target briefly... close range and long range... 30 mm always goes first, then 7,62mm coax follow... but no AGS... even not when infantry was near... thats the reason i am asking others... AGS was shooting before 4.0 Video is presenting ability to shoot Kornets on the move... but its not in the game... i let my BMP-3M move slow for 1000m against Abrams and it never fired Kornets... when it stops it is different story... Also i parked BTR 82A, BMP-2M and BMP-3M side by side an they fired at same Abrams parked 1000m in front of them. BTR depleted all ammo except ABHE but once it even tried to fire with it... no kill BMP-2M fired 30mm main gun first and then tried Kornets... mostly killed target, but sometimes even 4 Kornets were useless... 2-3 times 3rd rocket hit the ground after launching... Also the animation is strange, it fires sometimes right and left tube and then second salvo goes all from left side... If not sucessfull BMP-2M is fighting until it depletes all ammo except 30 mm HE. What is interesting BMP-3M never uses AT-10 ATGM and it stops after a while to fire at the Abrams. It just sits there and wait. Thats it, i tried to kill you, i cannot so lets just wait whats happen... BMP-2M is harder fighter

I am not able to force my BMP-2M to use AGS-17... Its me or you have similar experience? How to do it with engine 4.0?

We expected tank riders aka BTR and BMP riders sitting on top of the vehicles...

So far i dislike new tracers, looks like laser weapons now to me... What i maybe havent seen before are MG deployment times. Now outside building deployment time is clearly visible 20 sec for PKM and when inside bulding tab changes to 2.2 minutes... Not sure it was before... But its perfect now!

Thank you Mr. John Kettler!

So another time can be translated like never...

Where is the follow vehicle command? Its not implemented?

During download you have option what to choose, so i have just seen it htere like this...

...act like dicks in relation to guys who saved them during WWII? First of all there will be maybe no WWII without possible support of Mr. George Bush's grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush, who was a director and shareholder of companies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany. While there is no suggestion that Prescott Bush was sympathetic to the Nazi cause, the documents reveal that the firm he worked for, Brown Brothers Harriman (BBH), acted as a US base for the German industrialist, Fritz Thyssen, who helped finance Hitler in the 1930s before falling out with him at the end of the decade. The Guardian has seen evidence that shows Bush was the director of the New York-based Union Banking Corporation (UBC) that represented Thyssen's US interests and he continued to work for the bank after America entered the war. So business like usual... Under the Lend-Lease Act of 1941, the United States sent billions of dollars of war materiel to its allies while postponing the question of payment until after the war. In the euphoria of victory, the United States forgave all except materiel which would be useful to the postwar civilian economy (trucks, for example). The Canadian equivalent of Lead-Lease was Mutual Aid, which, so far as I know, did not require the recipient to return or pay for the materiel in question when the war ended. There was at least one documentary on History Channel where they discovered, that several shipments have been invoiced at least 3 times. Not to mention that even all sinked ships with lost material have been counted like delivered and were counted in total amount at the end... But my opinion is that UA will pay it, with money or something else, its not pure love...

Dear Haiduk, SOMEBODY has paid your toys, US Taxpayers or UA ones... And you want to tell me, that they gave you all these toys because of pure love? You will pay full price sooner or later, nothing is for free, agree or not...

Ok, i bought full bundle. For CMBS there is 3 GB CM Black Sea 2.00 Full Windows and 76 MB CM Black Sea Upgrade 4 Windows. What is this 2.00? For Italy there is only CM Italy 2.00 Full Windows and CM Italy Upgrade 3.00??? Windows? No 4 for Italy or just mistake?

What if the answer is much simplier. UA bought analog UAV's, now they will need better ones and will pay this time for digital UAV's... business must go on