Jump to content

I Can't Wait For The East And West Germans To Arrive


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, holoween said:

I have yet to bounce anything with m60s so leo1 having the same gun performance (no idea about the fcs) but being smaller and faster should if anything be an improvement.

I think thats the same conclusion the French and Germans had. Might as well build enough armor to protect against autocannon and use the remainder on more speed and firepower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I'm not really expecting the Chieftain to perform phenomenally better than the M60 in the timeframe of CMCW. I believe it's still using the same L15APDS ammunition in 1979-1982 that it had in 1965 (I don't think the L23 APFSDS comes out until 1985), so despite having a bigger gun I don't think it will prove any better at killing T-64s than the M60 (I think the L15 should perform better than the M728, but not quite as well as the M735). Its Stillbrew armor package won't come out until 1986, well after the timeframe of CMCW. I have, on rare occasions, seen rounds bounce off of the needle nosed turret of the M60 (exception, not the rule). Perhaps a higher proportion of rounds will bounce off of the thicker armor and steeper angles of the Chieftain's turret, but given that it's still just homogenous steel against late 70s/ early 80s ammunition I expect the overwhelming majority of rounds will still get through. 

I expect if CMCW had been set in the late 60s/ early 70s the Chieftain would be significantly more survivable with significantly more firepower than the M60 (or if it had been set in the late 80s for that matter, when the Chieftain had newer ammunition and Stillbrew armor). But in the game's current setting I expect the main practical difference to be that it will have somewhat worse mobility.

The Leopard 1 should be the exact opposite. I still don't expect it to be any more survivable (in fact, if it was rare for the M60 to bounce a shot, the Leo 1 should never bounce a shot) or be any better at killing T-64s, but it should be a bit faster. In any case, I can hardly wait to see both the Chieftain and the Leopard 1 in action. While this might not be the most flattering time period for the Chieftain, it is still an interesting vehicle.

I'm not sure if the Marder will quite be a match for the BMP-2 (should be better than the BMP-1), but will definitely stand more of a chance than the M113. Does anyone happen to know what the British mech-infantry are riding around in from 1979-1982? I'm pretty sure the Warrior hasn't entered service yet.

Edited by Centurian52
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Centurian52 said:

I'm not sure if the Marder will quite be a match for the BMP-2 (should be better than the BMP-1), but will definitely stand more of a chance than the M113. Does anyone happen to know what the British mech-infantry are riding around in from 1979-1982? I'm pretty sure the Warrior hasn't entered service yet.

Boots DMS for Light role, FV-432 for Mech Inf, CVR-T for RAC - no Warrior.

Edited by Combatintman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, holoween said:

smaller and faster should if anything be an improvement.

The European infrastructure also plays a role. Example the Sherman and British cruisers in WW2 which could negotiate most bridges in Europe. The German tanks by that time were defending so maneuvering played a lesser role. The Leo1 like the M60 was a tank the designers felt they should have had during WW2. That era came to an end with the ATGM. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Codreanu said:

Has HESH ever been modeled in a CM game? If not, the Chieftain would be stuck with nothing but APDS and maybe a smoke shell, right?

I'm pretty sure the Challengers in SF2 have HESH.

I like HESH as a multipurpose round. It's great for mouse holing entry points for infantry and blows up infantry and light vehicles decently. 

H

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Rinaldi said:

Think you misread. He's saying when he is commanding M60s he's never had their armour defeat Soviet rounds; so in that case he might as well get the same firepower in a nimbler package.

Yeppers, that was what I was trying to communicate. 

I haven't never had M60s bounce a Sov round*, but it's like getting a rare bonus. Great when it happens but don't count on it. 

H

*I'm remembering a few solid shot that have been deflected by the armor on a M60, and a few HEAT that got penetrations but managed to miss anything vital. Those cases being the exception much more than the rule and the TacAI does seem to fire more HEAT with the 100 and 115mm main guns when sooting at M60s. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/25/2022 at 8:34 PM, Simcoe said:

How different would the East Germans be? Wouldn't it all be the same Soviet hardware?

In contrast to the soviet OOB, we would see a number of T-72´s in frontline use with the NVA. No T-62, a lot of upgraded T-55 and only very few BMP-2´s. Interestingly, in contrast to german army tradition, "Auftragstaktik" (mission command) was not in use in the NVA.

To have the NVA would be great. Those helmets for me epitomize the cold war. And as it has been said, they would have been in the forefront of an Invasion. There even was a "Blücher-Orden" (award) already prepared for the first units to cross the rhine. 

 

Edited by Hacketäuer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Hacketäuer said:

To have the NVA would be great. Those helmets for me epitomize the cold war.

They where developed in the 3.Reich as M45 / Type BII (prototype was registered as patent on December 7, 1943), but only testet in combat by the Wehrmacht in small numbers (picture from September 1944, Westfront):

M45.jpg

source: https://archive.org/details/DieDeutscheWochenschauNr.733 (Minute 5:48)

Reichspatent-706467-Stahlhelm-NVA.jpg.70

In GDR M45 was then improved to M56 NVA version.

-> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/M45_(Stahlhelm)

Supposedly, before the introduction of Kevlar helmets, they had the the best ballistic protection and earshot range.

Would be cool if this could be simulated in CMCW. (like very small percentage increase for shrapnel protection and command audibility range).

Edited by sawomi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the game designers will add some Soviet Airborne Troops with the BMD and SU-57, Then we can forget about the Soviet Marines!! I really can't wait to see how the Leopard I and Leopard II fair against the T-64/T-72. The early German Leopard tank isn't the same tank in CMSF, just like the Abrams tank it had many modifications done to it in the first 10 years. I just started reading a book on the Leopard II by Osprey Publishing. it's the Leopard II from 1979-1998, so that's how I'm going to learn about its upgrades. I would also like to see the HOT and Milan Missiles in use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/30/2022 at 9:42 AM, Rinaldi said:

Think you misread. He's saying when he is commanding M60s he's never had their armour defeat Soviet rounds; so in that case he might as well get the same firepower in a nimbler package.

Ah, I see now. True to that then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would also be great to see the 82nd and 101st Airborne Divisions then add some M-551 Sheridan's to the mix and now you have a Force Multiplier, and then add some Soviet Su-57 and Su-85's, a few Bmd's. Dang just the Airborne Units could be a module all by itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...