Bufo

I think the real purpose is something entirely different. How would the players react if they saw in reality how simple things are in this game?

See above

Now I remember, this only works in hot seat mode and not in PBEM.

So simple. One player watches the replay then gives orders. He cannot cheat. The other player gives orders first then watches the result immediately. If this guy is not satisfied he can just reload the save as many times as he would like. This only works in hot seat mode though, not in PBEM.

If you mean the PBEM mode, well one player can cheat because he can use a 1 minute "look into the future".

I really don't get why is this so hard to understand. Maybe a sketch for visualization would help

There are no white balls.

I was waiting for the "nothing wrong here this game is perfect you are stupid" replays. You think there is nothing wrong with not seeing something that is directly in front of something else that you can see? The situation you described is a totally different situation. The problem is not that he could hit an invisible unit.

That's not a spotted icon. Its the "somebody told me around here should be a tank but I cannot see it" icon. It is clearly invisible to the gunner at this point.

This is a very good example of the flawed spotting.

Screenshot please.

LoS tool comes to mind.

He is not talking about the actual field of view, but point-to-point possibilities. In other words, if I want to move my tank, where do I move it? A tool like this would be very useful.

Yes, but expanding bullets are banned for example. "Bullets Which Expand or Flatten Easily in the Human Body"

US and Russia didnt sign the agreement to ban AP land mines.

What we want to see as new game features or just which time period and location in a new CM game?

As title says, after reloading the cover of the PK machinegun (I don't know if PKM or PKP) stays open in some cases and the infantry fires with it like that.

Care to explain?

If I play War Thunder on opengl I get around 50 fps on average with maximum settings in QHD resolution. The video quality and demand is incomparable between the two (in War Thunder it is so much higher). IMHO the problem is not the opengl here, but the unoptimized or just simply badly written code for the engine. Thats it, nothing else.

In turned based mode the performance is the same. But everything is calculated in advance. In other words, there are zero calculations going on and performance is still abysmal. No, calculations are not the reason.

In some campaigns your ammo won't be refilled between battles at all.

It is in the advanced tutorial campaign, and the manual states this as well. (Page 20, start of the advanced tutorial campaign, page 29 mission 3 last defence)

No, its more akin to world of conflict (Regiments) and Wargame series (Cold War Game).

There are actually 2 upcoming Cold war RTS, one that you already mentioned: Regiments The other one is: Cold War Game I think the latter is going to be more realistic.