Jump to content

AttorneyAtWar

Members
  • Posts

    1,490
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Reputation Activity

  1. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar reacted to agusto in Unofficial Screenshots & Videos Thread   
    Little green men dismount their UFOs and prepare for a night raid on some nearby UKR troops..
     
    Something is going to blow up soon...

  2. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar reacted to TCMHQ in Donezk Airport map - WIP   
    Gentlemen,
     
    just a short impression of a new project I started today: a massive 4 x 3 KM map of the infamous Donezk Airport and its industrial/commercial surroundings and villages.
    The map is based on this google map area:
     

     
     
    A very early WIP impression:
     


     
    Dont´t hold your breath: this will take a few weeks to finish......
     
    Cheers
     
    Tom aka TCMHQ
     
     
  3. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar got a reaction from gunnersman in Chrisnd I am sorry   
    You have the honor of being my very first casualty, you were blown away by an ags-17 in the mission "An August morning". Unfortunately you didn't have the cruel irony of dieing as a unhatched tank commander.
     
    Great game BFC I am loving it and ive only been playing for 20 minutes!
     

     
     
  4. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar got a reaction from astano in Chrisnd I am sorry   
    You have the honor of being my very first casualty, you were blown away by an ags-17 in the mission "An August morning". Unfortunately you didn't have the cruel irony of dieing as a unhatched tank commander.
     
    Great game BFC I am loving it and ive only been playing for 20 minutes!
     

     
     
  5. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar got a reaction from sburke in Chrisnd I am sorry   
    You have the honor of being my very first casualty, you were blown away by an ags-17 in the mission "An August morning". Unfortunately you didn't have the cruel irony of dieing as a unhatched tank commander.
     
    Great game BFC I am loving it and ive only been playing for 20 minutes!
     

     
     
  6. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar got a reaction from agusto in down load speeds 100kb/s   
    Were all experiencing high levels of electronic jamming.
     

  7. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar got a reaction from Capt. Toleran in down load speeds 100kb/s   
    Were all experiencing high levels of electronic jamming.
     

  8. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar got a reaction from AkumaSD in An update on the update!   
    You never know, it could be tomorrow!
     
    They want the game released as much as we want to play it.
  9. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar got a reaction from sburke in An update on the update!   
    Guys the only update were getting next is the game coming out!
     

  10. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar reacted to VladimirTarasov in Russian speakers help me out here   
    It is like the American equivalent to "over" on radio chatter.
  11. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar reacted to Na Vaske in Russian speakers help me out here   
    It is saying "done talking" ie: over
  12. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar got a reaction from Shorker in How about some basic advice for those of us new to modern?   
    Oh boy, yeah both sides have plenty of new toys that make the LAW look like a pea shooter. Lets go through the list (Mainly because I have far too much time on my hands).
     
    AT-4- Basically the replacement for the LAW its a single fire hand-held anti tank/emplacement rocket launcher, US squads are equipped generously with the AT-4. This baby can be fired from up to 300 meters away, after that its accuracy is diminished severely, however distance does not decrease penetration power, it is fully capable of penetrating up to 450mm of armor. Unfortunately it will probably have trouble with more advanced Russian tanks like the T-90 that sport Kontakt-5 ERA armor, firing from the side or rear though it is probably a guaranteed penetration and kill. The AT-4CS which is modeled in game can also be fired safely from inside buildings, without risk of injury from back-blast.
     
    AT-4 in action-
     
    Javelin Missile Launcher- The Javelin is one of the US strongest hand-held anti tank launcher systems in the world (Probably the best in the world honestly, no bias here I promise ), its effective range is about 2500m but it requires at least 75 to arm and acquire the target, it is also fire and forget. The Javelin consists of two parts, the CLU (Command launch unit) and the tube itself that carries the missile (Which is disposable), the javelin can be reused as long as i has a CLU unit, and missiles of course. When a Javelin is fired there is no warning, it is all done through passive IR tracking on the CLU, an interesting characteristic to the javelin is that once it is fired, it will climb high up into the sky above the target and attack the top of the tank, this means that there really is no way to defeat a javelin missile in that launch mode, it is to high for an APS (Active protection system) system to defeat and top armor isn't very thick on any Russian tank. A javelin can also fire horizontally, but this means it is at the mercy of an APS like arena which can knock it out of the sky. Make sure to grab Javelins out of the back of Bradleys, they are invaluable, and tip the scales immensely in US favor against armor. Oh yeah and don't miss they cost about 80K a pop!
     
    Javelin Missile in action-
     
    TOW 2-B Anti tank missile- The infamous TOW ATGM missile is usually mounted on APC's such as the Bradley, but can also be mounted on a tripod for infantry use, the TOW is wire guided and its launcher contains its own thermal imaging system for target aquisition. What is special about the TOW-2B (Emphasis on the B is that it is also a top attack munition much like the javelin, only the TOW-2B detonates above the target horizontally and fires an penetrator straight into the top, the TOW is vulnerable to APS though so be careful!
     
    TOW-2B in action- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUMxZ34Ptco
     
    These are the main "hand-held" anti tank weapons that the US uses...with weapons like the Javelin its almost like were cheating isn't it?
  13. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar got a reaction from Simon1279 in ChrisND Stream Footage   
    ChrisND showed off some Black Sea footage Live today and posted it on Youtube, so I thought I would make sure everyone gets to see it!



    Enjoy!
  14. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar reacted to JonS in What does "set piece battle" mean?!?!?!   
    'Set-Piece' (or deliberate) attack is at the grand-tactical/operational level, not strategic - mainly because you don't bother about battles at the strategic level, you're worried about campaigns. Op COBRA and Op QUEEN were both set piece battles. Basically, the idea is to take the time to get all your ducks in a row before the battle starts. That means arranging the fire support, conducting battle-specific training, organising units into assault - 2nd echelon - reserve, and positioning them accordingly, preparing and delivering orders down to a very low level (ie, the corps commander prepares and presents orders to his divisional commanders, who then derive and prepare their own orders and present them to their regimental commanders, who then prepare and present their orders to the battalion commanders, who prepare and present their orders to the company commanders, who prepare and present their own orders to their platoon commanders, who prepare and present orders to their squad commanders, who brief/present orders to their squads), distribution of aerial photos and maps with intel overlays, stockpiling of ammunition, fuel, and specific stores that might be needed (such as bridging material), etc. Then the whole thing kicks off at a specific time according to the designated H-hour, with all the various parts moving in a coordinated fashion and thus maxmising the  leverage that combined arms brings to the battlefield, as well as any other specific advantages that the attacker might have (such as better training, or comms, or intel, or night vision gear, or fire support, etc.)
     
    There are loads of examples of set piece battles from Korea, as well as some from Vietnam. The opening ground phase of Op DESERT STORM was a set piece too, especially the USMC assault straight up the guts into Kuwait. Crossings of major rivers are often set-piece, mainly because of the pronounced advantages the defender enjoys and the need to bring up bridging stores.
     
    The downside of set-piece is that they can take a while to set up, and thus generally give the defender more time to prepare his defence and/or divine exactly where the boot is going to fall and prepare appropriately. Often once a front has settled down for a while, a set-piece is appropriate because the defender will have thoroughly prepared his defence, and the attacker is not required to press the tempo by attacking ASAP. Surpirse can be tricky to accomplish in a set-piece, but on the other hand the time taken to tee-up a set piece means that a comprehensive deception plan can be prepared and enacted, to generate a very high degree of surprise - Op DESERT STORM is a great example here. Saddam knew the Coalition forces were coming, and he knew down to the day when they'd be coming. But he had no idea where they'd be coming, and was soundly thrashed in part because of that surprise.
     
    There isn't really a sharp split between meeting engagements, hasty attacks, and deliberate/set-piece attacks. The boundaries between them are quite fluid depending on the specific circumstances. An operation can also transition quickly between the three - Op COBRA, for example, started as a deliberate/set-piece and stayed that way for 2-3 days. After that there was a short period of hasty attacks, then it transitioned again to meeting engagements as the Americans made a clean break through the complete depth of the German's prepared defences. Sometime later it transitioned again to a hasty attack by the Germans at Mortain.
  15. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar got a reaction from LukeFF in Strategic and tactical realities in CMBS   
    Putin's probably going to need that one pretty soon.
  16. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar got a reaction from BletchleyGeek in Strategic and tactical realities in CMBS   
    Yeah what would ever give us the impression attacks on that airport were led by Russian regulars.
     

     
    Boy those separatists stole quite a few tanks, marked em up like Russian tanks too...
  17. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar got a reaction from A Canadian Cat in Strategic and tactical realities in CMBS   
    Crap? No I don't think its crap, and I am being very civil. I will drop it, but I have no problem saying I disagree with you.
  18. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar got a reaction from Cuddles the Warmonger in How about some basic advice for those of us new to modern?   
    I think its in your best interest to stop posting for now.
  19. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar got a reaction from Doug Williams in How about some basic advice for those of us new to modern?   
    Oh boy, yeah both sides have plenty of new toys that make the LAW look like a pea shooter. Lets go through the list (Mainly because I have far too much time on my hands).
     
    AT-4- Basically the replacement for the LAW its a single fire hand-held anti tank/emplacement rocket launcher, US squads are equipped generously with the AT-4. This baby can be fired from up to 300 meters away, after that its accuracy is diminished severely, however distance does not decrease penetration power, it is fully capable of penetrating up to 450mm of armor. Unfortunately it will probably have trouble with more advanced Russian tanks like the T-90 that sport Kontakt-5 ERA armor, firing from the side or rear though it is probably a guaranteed penetration and kill. The AT-4CS which is modeled in game can also be fired safely from inside buildings, without risk of injury from back-blast.
     
    AT-4 in action-
     
    Javelin Missile Launcher- The Javelin is one of the US strongest hand-held anti tank launcher systems in the world (Probably the best in the world honestly, no bias here I promise ), its effective range is about 2500m but it requires at least 75 to arm and acquire the target, it is also fire and forget. The Javelin consists of two parts, the CLU (Command launch unit) and the tube itself that carries the missile (Which is disposable), the javelin can be reused as long as i has a CLU unit, and missiles of course. When a Javelin is fired there is no warning, it is all done through passive IR tracking on the CLU, an interesting characteristic to the javelin is that once it is fired, it will climb high up into the sky above the target and attack the top of the tank, this means that there really is no way to defeat a javelin missile in that launch mode, it is to high for an APS (Active protection system) system to defeat and top armor isn't very thick on any Russian tank. A javelin can also fire horizontally, but this means it is at the mercy of an APS like arena which can knock it out of the sky. Make sure to grab Javelins out of the back of Bradleys, they are invaluable, and tip the scales immensely in US favor against armor. Oh yeah and don't miss they cost about 80K a pop!
     
    Javelin Missile in action-
     
    TOW 2-B Anti tank missile- The infamous TOW ATGM missile is usually mounted on APC's such as the Bradley, but can also be mounted on a tripod for infantry use, the TOW is wire guided and its launcher contains its own thermal imaging system for target aquisition. What is special about the TOW-2B (Emphasis on the B is that it is also a top attack munition much like the javelin, only the TOW-2B detonates above the target horizontally and fires an penetrator straight into the top, the TOW is vulnerable to APS though so be careful!
     
    TOW-2B in action- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUMxZ34Ptco
     
    These are the main "hand-held" anti tank weapons that the US uses...with weapons like the Javelin its almost like were cheating isn't it?
  20. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar got a reaction from domfluff in How about some basic advice for those of us new to modern?   
    I think its in your best interest to stop posting for now.
  21. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar got a reaction from Douglas Ruddd in M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS)- will we see it in Black Sea?   
    I am pretty sure this and the MLRS aren't in because they wouldn't be used at this level of combat (At least what BFC really wants to concentrate on), or because they are just simply too destructive. Remember this system is literally called "A grid square remover", anything caught in the kilometer wide spread of these systems will be dead. Ever hear of "Steel Rain"? it didn't get that nick name for nothing.
  22. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar got a reaction from LukeFF in So which is the best spotter?   
    You realize Combat Mission is a simulator right...its supposed to be realistic as possible.
  23. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar got a reaction from domfluff in So which is the best spotter?   
    You realize Combat Mission is a simulator right...its supposed to be realistic as possible.
  24. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar got a reaction from LukeFF in How about some basic advice for those of us new to modern?   
    I think its in your best interest to stop posting for now.
  25. Upvote
    AttorneyAtWar got a reaction from -Eddie- in How about some basic advice for those of us new to modern?   
    I think its in your best interest to stop posting for now.
×
×
  • Create New...