Jump to content

Vanir Ausf B

Members
  • Posts

    9,629
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by Vanir Ausf B

  1. I prefer bigger battles, which may be unmanageable in RT from what I've read. Also, PBEM roXors. So WEGO for me.
  2. BFC has said the BMP-3 will be added for sure, and probably a new tank. T-80 or T-90, I don't know. Both? Also, maybe air support.
  3. I personally would get the EVGA, which is only $5 more after rebate. BTW, the XP 2800 is 2.08 GHz unless you overclocked it.
  4. This seems workable to me. I am pleasantly surprised to hear that the randomly selected maps feature is in, as it was tops on my wish list. When this idea was first discussed last year, IIRC Steve said it would be considered for a module but "not in the initial release". Maybe I missed the anouncement that it was in.
  5. Forget the Scuds. PAC-3 eats Scuds for lunch. I'll take the Iskander. Terminal phase manoeuvring for da win. Oh, and to defend against the retaliation, S-400 Triumf
  6. I don't think it's the market. I think Steve just isn't interested in the subject.
  7. They have said before that CMSF will not take specific advantage of dual core processors.
  8. I don't see why this would be so. I'd be very surprised if the CM series of games have not sold far more copies in the UK than in Israel. There are only about 7 million people in Israel. BFC are targeting their biggest markets. US, UK, and Germany -- which will enable Canadian forces to be introduced as well. I bet BFC have sold more copies of CM in Finland than Israel. Don't get me wrong, I think an Israeli module would be fun but it ain't gonna happen. Besides, I think a French module would be more fun in blue on blue games (I had to get that in there)
  9. IDF was ruled out long ago. I'd rather have the French anyway.
  10. I like the one from the 80s. IIRC: "We kill more people before 9 AM than most countries kill all day." Or something like that.
  11. If things go as planned, you will. We'll get Challenger IIs first, though. No Merkava.
  12. CMplayer is back, eh? You're still top 10 in the post count even after taking 2 years off.
  13. I'm sure the Syrians can be competitive given the right conditions. I'm just worried what happens when the conditions change. They can hold thier own defending in close terrain, but what if they are on the attack against defending US forces? Or a meeting engagement? They may have to get creative on how to define "victory".
  14. Aesthetically pleasing! The black silhouette on green is reminiscent of the Panzer Leader board game I loved as a kid. But could I suggest different color backgrounds for each side, like red or desert tan for the Syrians?
  15. I think you're basically correct, Nathan. At least with the Cold War you have two powerful protagonists with proud military traditions. Nobody really admires the Syrian army with its sorry history. I feel about as inspired by the notion of commanding the Syrians as I would taking the Zulus against the British. But I will say again, I think the additional units and nations in the modules, coupled with the blue on blue feature will be the saving grace for CMSF for a lot of people who are otherwise not interested in the primary setting.
  16. I'm surprised kip hasn't shown up in this thread yet. He could go on for pages on this subject. And he'd be right. NATO vs. Warsaw Pact circa 1980 would be a great game! But I guess we'll settle for a pseudo-Russian force of Syrians armed with some what-if weaponry when the modules come out. Blue on blue will be a kick in the ass. Too bad no French.
  17. I'd like to see air support added for the Syrians in a module. Hopefully it would not be difficult to do as, if I understand how air support works in the game, it would not require any new models or graphics.
  18. It would be impossible to make a new game with a new engine in one year. IIRC it took at least 3 years to make CMBO.
  19. I may be mistaken, but I think it's actually Charles in that picture who's in desperate need of new headwear.
  20. No worries. I suspect Steve could solve his dilution problem by simply concentrating harder. ... These threads are pointless. Why complain over something that has not happened and is very unlikely to happen? If you're gonna bitch at least bitch about a problem that actually exists. And I say that as a proud PBEM bigot who will have little reason to buy the game if by some chance there is no PBEM.
  21. Steve, try clearing your cash and refreshing. Maybe try a different browser (I'm on Firefox). Can you see the much smaller version tom posted? I think the pic was originally published in der Spiegel, but I don't know if it's hosted anywhere else than where I found it.
  22. Nope, you asked it first and can therefore claim all the suckage.
×
×
  • Create New...