Jump to content

How Hot is Ukraine Gonna Get?


Probus

Recommended Posts

Russia said something, therefore it must not be true.

Aside from that generally sound approach to assessing Russian official information, let's keep in mind that as of yet Ukraine has not shot down a single transport aircraft this entire war.  Not one.  And now they supposedly deliberately targeted AND hit one AND it had their own people on it?  Yeah, I don't think so.

I'm not even sure Russia would have Ukrainian POWs in one of their precious transport planes at all.  Busses would be more like it, IMHO.

Russia might have done this as a false flag operation or Ukraine did shoot down a plane (carrying Iranian stuff) and Russia decided to try and make lemonade out of a pile of poop.

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Battlefront.com said:

Russia might have done this as a false flag operation or Ukraine did shoot down a plane (carrying Iranian stuff) and Russia decided to try and make lemonade out of a pile of poop.

Steve

While approach to Russian propaganda is reasonable, this time I think false flag option is not even remotely plausible. Il-76 is valuable military asset they are short of; if they want to stage an accident in order to hide murdered POW's they have dozens different ways (at this point they don't care about them anyway to even hide such fact). Also military aircraft as potentiall "negative MH370" to show West perfidy is very weak explanation; they would use civilian airliner for it.

Thus we are here with 3 plausible causes:

1.Something accidently blow off on the board, regardless if indeed Ukrianian prisoners were there or not.

2. Somebody in Russian air defence made mistake- rather unlikely, it's close to Belgorod airport and big, slow moving transport has very different signal and look than fastmovers that could potentially come from Ukraine.

3. Indeed Ukrainian work, by longe range AA asset or somebody with Manpad.

3rd seems most logical as for now. The question regarding Ukrianian prisoners seems murky now, and if they indeed were there, officials from AFU responsible for mission will likely prefer to keep it quiet, as question of prisoners seems rather touchy in Ukrainian society now.

It's also not impossible it has nothing to do with any swap and Russians simply routinely carry dozen or so POW in their planes as hostages; that would fit them frankly. Simple solution to several problems at once.

Edited by Beleg85
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Carolus said:

Supposedly the Russian list of passengers with Ukrainian PoWs is faked. 

 

I'm surprised Russia has not claimed that the Il-76 the Ukrainians shot down was full of puppies.

But seriously, I know we should stay objective and look at all the facts but even if what Russia is saying is true which I really doubt.

Russian officials are like the boy who cried wolf at this point, between CIA funded biolabs creating supersoldiers, British PMCs selling children to the Coca-Cola company and Ukrainians creating an ecological catastrophe in their own country by destroying the Kakhovka Dam.

Frankly I just don't believe a damn word they say at this point, when they make claims like this.

 

EDIT: Footage appears reportedly showing the crash site.

 

Edited by Harmon Rabb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Holien said:

This attack on the 13th how do we know of the ones that got through did they not hit military valid targets? 

I doubt anybody in Ukraine will say about attacked military targets. What is known from twitter and TG discussions, most of missiles aimed machine-building industrial facilities. 

I posted a photo of two Kinzhal warheads, destroyed by our sappers - obviously these missiles had to hit Kropyvnytskyi airfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Beleg85 said:

While approach to Russian propaganda is reasonable, this time I think false flag option is not even remotely plausible. Il-76 is valuable military asset they are short of; if they want to stage an accident in order to hide murdered POW's they have dozens different ways (at this point they don't care about them anyway to even hide such fact). Also military aircraft as potentiall "negative MH370" to show West perfidy is very weak explanation; they would use civilian airliner for it.

Thus we are here with 3 plausible causes:

1.Something accidently blow off on the board, regardless if indeed Ukrianian prisoners were there or not.

2. Somebody in Russian air defence made mistake- rather unlikely, it's close to Belgorod airport and big, slow moving transport has very different signal and look than fastmovers that could potentially come from Ukraine.

3. Indeed Ukrainian work, by longe range AA asset or somebody with Manpad.

3rd seems most logical as for now. The question regarding Ukrianian prisoners seems murky now, and if they indeed were there, officials from AFU responsible for mission will likely prefer to keep it quiet, as question of prisoners seems rather touchy in Ukrainian society now.

It's also not impossible it has nothing to do with any swap and Russians simply routinely carry dozen or so POW in their planes as hostages; that would fit them frankly. Simple solution to several problems at once.

Oh, I don't think it was a false flag operation in the truest sense.  It's a coverup for something they don't want people to know the truth about, but can't cover up the basic fact that a plane was shot down.

That said, I will remind everybody that in 2022 at some point the Russians deliberately murdered a bunch of Ukrainian POWs in a building and then tried to make it seem that HIMARS (or artillery, I forget which) hit the building.  The exact chain of events is of course unknown, but the theory at the time was they were murdered because someone was skimming the supplies for the POWs and was about to be found out so they killed/burned the evidence.  The MoD was happy to go along with a cover story.

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This incident highlights that up until now Ukraine has not been attacking transport aircraft by choice.  I mean seriously, who here doubts Ukraine's ability to bring down transport aircraft if it really wanted to?  It would be far easier than sneaking into secured military bases and putting explosives on planes or arranging for a truck bomb to blow up the Kerch bridge.

I've not thought of this before, but now I am.  Why hasn't Ukraine been targeting military transport planes?  Is it because there's some secret agreement with Russia?  You don't shoot down ours, we won't shoot down yours?  We have hostages on all flights so don't think about it? 

It has to be something like this, don't you think?

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Battlefront.com said:

This incident highlights that up until now Ukraine has not been attacking transport aircraft by choice.  I mean seriously, who here doubts Ukraine's ability to bring down transport aircraft if it really wanted to?  It would be far easier than sneaking into secured military bases and putting explosives on planes or arranging for a truck bomb to blow up the Kerch bridge.

I've not thought of this before, but now I am.  Why hasn't Ukraine been targeting military transport planes?  Is it because there's some secret agreement with Russia?  You don't shoot down ours, we won't shoot down yours?  We have hostages on all flights so don't think about it? 

It has to be something like this, don't you think?

Steve

I was just thinking the reason would be that the Russian's aren't dumb enough to fly transport planes close enough to Ukraine. But now that I think about it, that can't possibly be the explanation 😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

The German MoD has raised its prediction for the German deliveries of 155 mm artillery ammunition to #Ukraine. More than 230,000 shells will be delivered this year (previous figure was 200,000 shells). With more than 80 Leopard 1 A5 and 450 protected vehicles, precise figures were also given for these systems.

Das ist gut.

Edited by Harmon Rabb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think 70km the other side of Belgorod means this is either some very ballsy SF with MANPADS or- more likely- the kind of SAM raid we've already seen a few times.

Roll a Patriot further forward than normal, light up a juicy target, bug out. Just an exercise in extending threat into areas the Russians think are safe.

Last week it was a Mainstay, this week it was Il-76.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

39 minutes ago, Battlefront.com said:

This incident highlights that up until now Ukraine has not been attacking transport aircraft by choice.  I mean seriously, who here doubts Ukraine's ability to bring down transport aircraft if it really wanted to?  It would be far easier than sneaking into secured military bases and putting explosives on planes or arranging for a truck bomb to blow up the Kerch bridge.

I've not thought of this before, but now I am.  Why hasn't Ukraine been targeting military transport planes?  Is it because there's some secret agreement with Russia?  You don't shoot down ours, we won't shoot down yours?  We have hostages on all flights so don't think about it? 

It has to be something like this, don't you think?

Steve

Just out of curiosity does anyone know how far clear of the war zone all/most most airlines are steering? Ukraine may have been avoiding shooting at anything resembling a transport plane out of an abundance of caution. And then they got solid intel on a target to good to pass on...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was some busy, so here is statistic of last missile strike:

41 missiles were launched, 21 were intercepted. Part of rest 20 missiles didn't reach own targets, due to manufacturing defects and EW work. Kyiv was attacked with 20 missiles (not clarified by types)

Missile types:

- 15 Kh-101 (15 shot down)

- 4 S-300 (0)

- 12 Iskander-M (5 - probably all five were destroyed over Kyiv)

- 8 Kh-22 missiles (0)

- 2 Kh-59 (1)

 

Again we can see:

41 % were cruise/AS misisles and here we have 94 % of interceptions 

39 % are ballistic missiles and SAM misiles for ballistic fire and here we have 31 % of total interceptions and 90-100 % of interceptions over places, defended with modern SAM systems like PAC-3 or SAMP-T

19 % of supersonic (close to hypersonic) cruise missiles - no interceptions, but they were launched on the areas didn't protected by Patriots/SAMP-T

What about probable targets. Look at Kharkiv. Total 15 missiles hit the city - 2 S-300, at least 6-7 Kh-22, not less 5 Iskanders. 10 citizenens were killed, about 70 wounded. Two more S-200 hit Balakliya city of Kharkiv oblast. 

On the video likely Kh-22 impact in Kharkiv in residental area.

 

One more missile ruined a part of residental building

 

A school was hit (Russians seriuosly think in the city close to the border any public building contains dozens of deployed UKR soldiers)

 

Close impact of missile seriously damaged other residental building

image.png.158619fa7058620cb490f563bec73e5a.png

Citizens also wrote about impacts in industrial areas. Gas pipe was damaged, causing a big fire and power facility, which temporary cut off from electricity abou half of the city

And Russian media: cadres of missile strike aftermath on Kharkiv. The AFU objects masked as residental buildings are destroyed

image.thumb.png.0d481a3ab51eeca1d11ab5fa3ef45203.png

On more Russian Kh-22 missiles probably struck Pavlohrad in Dnipropetrovsk oblast and Shostka in Sumy oblast, these cities have military factories. Results is unknown, but in Pavlohrad seriously damaged two schools and eight multistorey buildings, at least 2 citizens were killed 

What in Kyiv? Likely only one missile reach own target. Russians victoriously defeated sport hall "Locomotive", belonging to "Ukrainain railroads" state company. 

image.png.340379c8f508927c0355ef3d90392b59.png

One warhead of shot down missile hit residental building and... didn't explode. Sappers later took warhead out of the flat

One missile obviosly tarheted buildng of MoD, but was shot down in 1 km, fragments fell down on avenue, so the traffic was closed for some time.

Total in this strike 18 civilains were killed and 130 wounded.

Edited by Haiduk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, dan/california said:

 

Just out of curiosity does anyone know how far clear of the war zone all/most most airlines are steering? Ukraine may have been avoiding shooting at anything resembling a transport plane out of an abundance of caution. And then they got solid intel on a target to good to pass on...

Russian passenger flights have been staying on routes at or to the east of the Volgogrod/Tambov line. They swerve a little farther east when something happens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Holien said:

I presume Russia moving Ukrainian POWs would use buses or trains to get to a land border crossing point not expensive planes?

Our former POWs told today Russians really sometime used tarnsport aviation for captives moving. BUT. For group in 50 captives were 20 MP servicemen and 3 of escorting persons from Army. So, Russian claims about 3 guardmen for 63 captives is BS.

This video posted above, shows large holes in the plane remains - so this was SAM work, not MANPAD. 

Also other video shows only two corpses on the field, no any signs of ground litterd by multiple bodies 

UKR General Staff claimed this was UKR AD work

 

Edited by Haiduk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dan/california said:

 

This is the same Bradley, who took out Russian T-90M. In longer version of this video the same commander, who used War Thunder skills in that battle said "today we weren't so lucky, alas"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...