JRMC1879
Members-
Posts
287 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by JRMC1879
-
[NEW PREVIEW] Juju's TweakedUI v2.0 interface enhancement mod
JRMC1879 replied to Juju's topic in CM Normandy Maps and Mods
Stunning work...cant say how much I appreciate all you guys who do this stuff. -
Some comtemplative words
JRMC1879 replied to Seedorf81's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
And what makes you think I love my mother more than this game. Jeez you got some screwed priorites:cool: -
Some comtemplative words
JRMC1879 replied to Seedorf81's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
Jeezus - what a dickhead. -
2.0 German Uniform Texture Issue
JRMC1879 replied to LukeFF's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
In new scenarios maybe - but not the stock ones . they have been broken. -
2.0 German Uniform Texture Issue
JRMC1879 replied to LukeFF's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
No I dont think it is solvable by the users ... for new scenarios it works - but uniform data for the old scenarios doesnt appear to be editable - presumably cause it uses an old data format. They all apear to have been set to standard and that is why airborne troops are wearing standard army uniforms. As I say - it is not editable in the scenario editor so is not fixable. Presumably someone should have written some code to allocate airborne uniforms to airborne troops in the stock scenarios. It likely explains the other uniform issues .... -
Repository Scenarios not working in new version.
JRMC1879 replied to Nidan1's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
Yes to all that - they look fine. -
Yes - uniforms are hugely different after 2.0
-
But you still make no sensible point. what you seemingly fail to understand is that the only people paying 10$ for the upgrade are those WHO HAVE ALREADY BOUGHT THE CMBN V1.0 game - they have also already said going forward only V2.0 of normandy will exist. Where are the lost sales therefore in your argument ? they are infact offering exactly the situation you suggest they should. Do you read your posts back to yourself ? Calling yourself a ginea pig just because you have played an earlier version of a game is ridiculous. Virtually every game out there these days gets a version two you have to pay for. The only argument to be made is that essentially those paying for the 10$ upgrade have funded the development of that for new customers who get V2.0 normandy when they buy new. Steve already said that didnt cover the cost of doing it and if thats the case I am more than happy to do it otherwise it wouldnt have happened. Seriously you are talking about BF in the same terms as microsoft and given your mealie mouthed critisism I wonder why you come here or buy theri games at all. Why dont you just spend your money on something you dont feel you are being fleeced over. Really your bitching is nauseatingly petty.
-
Repository Scenarios not working in new version.
JRMC1879 replied to Nidan1's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
"Graphics all messed up is not very informative" what do you mean all messed up? I have opened a couple of repository scenarios and they are fine. -
FAO Battlefront. Will MG upgrade game to V2?
JRMC1879 replied to joebloggs's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
No reason at all. -
Dont worry about the moaners. It is what works for battlefront that enables them to keep pumping this stuff out I am concerned about. I have so much crap sitting on my hardrive that I paid just as much for and dont get an ounce of play out of compared to the CM stuff. The single most important thing is not the pathetic whining about 10 bucks but that you stay in business and keep giving us the games.
-
Deploy Bug Fixed-Tentative
JRMC1879 replied to Frankster65's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
It wasnt a criticism -
Deploy Bug Fixed-Tentative
JRMC1879 replied to Frankster65's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
Well I posted this in tecnical support - but no answer. Would be nice if BF give a response to this issue as it seriously friggs the game. -
The pricing strategy is interesting but not ethical
JRMC1879 replied to togi's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
Well the point is I dont really give a toss what you think. that is what battlefront are doing - and more importantly what they need to do. Seriously - 10 $ is a box of friggin soap powder to put in my washing machine. No. really thats what it is. I probably buy 20 of those a year if not more I really dont see any of your points. So thats 200 bucks on soap powder and 10 bucks on a game that gives me hours of enjoyment. the soap powder gives me none. Seriously dude - get some friggin perspective on it. -
Deploy Bug Fixed-Tentative
JRMC1879 replied to Frankster65's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
No you are right ... even with a face command when you order deploy without any movement then they go bannanas and run all over the place. Thats not good - suggest this will need a hotfix from BF as it is bloody annoying. the only way I found to resolve it was to give a move order to the same action spot they already occupy. Deploy after a move seems to be working ok ... -
Deploy Bug Fixed-Tentative
JRMC1879 replied to Frankster65's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
It seems a bit wierd. Try this and see if it makes a difference to what happens (unless you already tried) Do same as you have done - but give a facing command at the waypoint they are deploying at - that seemed to rectify the issue for me ... -
FAO Battlefront. Will MG upgrade game to V2?
JRMC1879 replied to joebloggs's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
Well yes - but the tin case was for the modules ... so you wont be able to put your upgrade disk in it in any case. Really - I cant see why you would want a hard copy of this in the least - as some one else said - you can burn to about a hundred and one things these days - so you are essentially paying BF 30 bucks to burn you a DVD. I can see some may want hard stuff for collectors sake but for this ? And my point was - until BF answer this themselves everything else is just speculation so why clog up the thread with more of it ? -
How bout some 2.0 reviews???
JRMC1879 replied to Javaslinger's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
Well worth it ... I personally think its much faster than it was. -
Yes - I had to pull this mod as it looked out of place with the aris stuff ... too bright.
-
Russia as Blue? Expansion request!
JRMC1879 replied to ww2steel's topic in Combat Mission Shock Force 1
Well - given the Ukraine is heading away from the more liberal pro western stance it took after the orange revolution and has formally withdrawn its request to be part of NATO - I am wondering what the scenario will be. I suppose the obvious would have been a russian move to invade - but it seems more likely these days that the ukraine would be on russias side in any conflict. I suppose there could be some issue with poland - but I would have thought the fight would be in poland then. given the game will require NATO to be on ukrainian soil I am kind of struggling to see a scenario where that would happen. Still - I stuggled with the syria thing and look what happened there. In any event I am presuming that the first "blue" side in the game will be the US - so they will have to be a main protagonist and not some advisor role. -
FAO Battlefront. Will MG upgrade game to V2?
JRMC1879 replied to joebloggs's topic in Combat Mission Battle for Normandy
you are just making it more confusing - what the hell does that mean. I think the thread is for battlefront to answer - not for you to make the same point again as you have elswhere. Why the hell does anyone want a disk for the upgrade in any case.