Lars Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 One nut... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Kettler Posted January 2, 2009 Share Posted January 2, 2009 Even with the abysmal level of historical ignorance in this country, I think that poor kid is in for a world of hurt in the years to come. That, mind, is without factoring in what he MAY be being taught. Regards, John Kettler 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackhorse Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 The latest regarding little Adolph http://news.aol.com/article/kids-with-nazi-names-taken-from-home/306100 HOLLAND TOWNSHIP, N.J. (Jan. 14) - Police say three New Jersey siblings whose names have Nazi connotations have been placed in the custody of the state. Holland Township Police Sgt. John Harris says workers from the state Division of Youth and Family Services removed 3-year-old Adolf Hitler Campbell and his younger sisters, JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell and Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell from their home Tuesday. Harris says family services did not tell police the reason the children were removed. Agency spokeswoman Kate Bernyk says it does not comment on specific cases. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitchen frizzy Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 So the state kicked in their door and hauled the kids away without explanation. Something supremely ironic about that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jurpo Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 So the state kicked in their door and hauled the kids away without explanation. Something supremely ironic about that. Preemptive action, as little Adolf was already exhibiting disturbing tendencies. Like, for instance, in this family album picture: http://s35.photobucket.com/albums/d165/mschartman/stuff/?action=view¤t=eliminatedjuicemy5.jpg 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanish Bombs Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 So the state kicked in their door and hauled the kids away without explanation. Something supremely ironic about that. Without explanation to the police, per the article. But it is possible that the police spokesman is either lying or uninformed. Lying because juvenile cases are given broad privacy protections that most other cases do not receive and it would be improper to comment on it to the press. Or uninformed because it is entirely likely that the child welfare workers took their action without the involvement of the police at any level. Either way, inclusion of the statement from the police spokesman is misleading or shoddy journalism at best. Not only have the parents been told the reason for the action, but they have already been given, or will be given in the next 24 hours, an opportunity to be heard before a judge who will review the child welfare officials actions and can reverse them. In my state the question is whether an 'urgent and immediate' necessity exists to take the children out of the home, in New Jersey it may be differently phrased but conceptually similar. And if the children stay in state custody, the Campbells will be given an opportunity to litigate their cause within a short amount of time - 30 days or so. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stalins Organ Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 So the state kicked in their door and hauled the kids away without explanation. Something supremely ironic about that. ...except that the state didn't kick down their door...and given the circumstances only a moron would wonder why ....which is presumably why the family don't know 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitchen frizzy Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 SB/SO: 1) Please refer to my sig line 2) If the state's reasons actually were the political leanings of the parents (I had assumed that WASN'T the reason, and the irony was in the coincidence), then it's actually not a joke. Nothing more fascist than hauling a person's kids off for political reeducation. Nothing more illegal, either. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stalins Organ Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 Don't worry BF - one day you'll master humour. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tread Head Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 A swastika is a swastika regardless of direction. THE SWASTIKA The Swastika is a well-know good-luck symbol from India. Unfortunately, it is too well known in the west, as the Nazis chose it as their main symbol. In Sanskrit, swastika means "conducive to well-being". In the Buddhist tradition, the swastika symbolizes the feet or footprints of the Buddha and is often used to mark the beginning of texts. Modern Tibetan Buddhism uses it as a clothing decoration. With the spread of Buddhism, it has passed into the iconography of China and Japan where it has been used to denote plurality, abundance, prosperity and long life. (In India, Hindus use the swastika to mark the opening pages of account books, thresholds, doors, and offerings, the right-hand swastika is a solar symbol and the left-hand version represents Kali and magic. Among the Jains it is the emblem of their seventh Tirthankara. Other uses of the symbol: in ancient Mesopotamia it was a favourite symbol on coinage, In Scandinavia it was the symbol for the god Thor's hammer. In early Christian art it was called the gammadion cross because it was made of four gammas. It is also found in Mayan and Navajo art.) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boeman Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 It makes me think, too, of the bikers throughout the US who wear 'Nazi'-style helmets (i.e., styled after the German M1935 helmet), when their fathers and grandfathers may well have fought in WW2 and risked their lives and even died fighting actual 'Nazis'. Every subset of underground culture seems to have found some allure in Nazi Germany in one form or another. For reasons I'll never know, I've personally seen numerous goth girls take to wearing the Knight's Cross as if it were a fashion trend. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Kettler Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 People, Happened to see the item about the kids' removal while Viewing and Rating today. Am unsure, though, which is worse: Nazi acculturation or ripping kids from their homes and sticking them in foster care, especially with names like the ones they bear. Recipe for disaster either way! gunnergoz, The California DMV is deathly afraid of two things appearing on personal plates: naughty words in any language (DMV reportedly has 130 different foreign language dictionaries it checks submissions against) and anything sexually suggestive. Am afraid "LSSAH" was way too groggy for the DMVers. Regards, John Kettler 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tero Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 ...except that the state didn't kick down their door...and given the circumstances only a moron would wonder why ....which is presumably why the family don't know Unless of course the reasons for taking the kids would not stand up if challenged in court (ie. the reason is the name of the child and not proven physical abuse, neglect or recless endagerment by the parents). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tero Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Not only have the parents been told the reason for the action, but they have already been given, or will be given in the next 24 hours, an opportunity to be heard before a judge who will review the child welfare officials actions and can reverse them. In my state the question is whether an 'urgent and immediate' necessity exists to take the children out of the home, in New Jersey it may be differently phrased but conceptually similar. And if the children stay in state custody, the Campbells will be given an opportunity to litigate their cause within a short amount of time - 30 days or so. Recently. here in Finland a divorced father of 6 lost the custody of his children to the wellfare people after his ex-wife who had been taking care of them was hospitalized. They deemed "a single person" can not take care so many children on his own (despite the ex had been taking care of them prior to being hospitalized). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lars Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 The interview with little Adolph's neighbors was great. Seems that address gets a lot of domestic disturbance calls. Who'd a thunk it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitchen frizzy Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Which article did you read that in? The articles I've read say the exact opposite. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lars Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Was a tv news report. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stalins Organ Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Unless of course the reasons for taking the kids would not stand up if challenged in court (ie. the reason is the name of the child and not proven physical abuse, neglect or recless endagerment by the parents). Even in that case a lot of people would still see this case as justification for licencing of breeding rights........ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeatEtr Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 I also think that some people should waive their rights to reproduction and pursue other hobbies. That's the sad fact, any jackass can have a kid. The future looks bleak with more morons having the ability to reproduce while superior intellectuals can't. If you don't believe me than just watch the documentary called "Idiocracy". Pretty soon we all will be drinking Brawdo, the thirst mutilator. Why is Brawdo so good you ask? Because it has electrolytes. Here's what our money will look like. Check it out! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunnergoz Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 I'd buy that for a dollar! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dietrich Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 For reasons I'll never know, I've personally seen numerous goth girls take to wearing the Knight's Cross as if it were a fashion trend. Goth girls wearing Knight's Crosses? Numerous goth girls wearing Knight's Crosses. Wow.... I must be hanging out at the wrong clubs. =P Then again, I don't live in a big city like Toronto. I was at a local Oktoberfest celebration -- a fairly low-key and family-friendly affair -- when I spotted a twentysomething spikey-haired guy with a runic "SS" tattoo on the back of his neck. It rather soured my mood; took another couple pints of Doppelbock to get my mind off it. When I see stuff like that, it really makes me want to chew out the person in question, because it's people like them who indirectly ensure that people never get past the German-equals-Nazi thing, so that people in general are in effect preventing from being able to see all the good things about Germans and German culture, food, music, etc. Of course, let's be honest: every German from 1933 to 1945 was a Jew-hating, Hitler-loving, concentration-camp-ignoring, civilian-slaughtering, baby-bayonetting Nazi. (Pardon the vicious sarcasm.) The California DMV is deathly afraid of two things appearing on personal plates: naughty words in any language (DMV reportedly has 130 different foreign language dictionaries it checks submissions against) and anything sexually suggestive. Am afraid "LSSAH" was way too groggy for the DMVers. Just the California DMV? You'd think "LSSAH" would elicit a red flag just on account of the inclusive "SS". Then again, a certain type of "all-American" hot rod is known as "SS", and seemingly no one gives a second thought about that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilhammer Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 Many cars and trucks are SS (Super Sport). I have seen a car in traffic around here; Marine sticker in the window, license plate 'KingTiger'. Been hoping to meet him one day for a game.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunnergoz Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Well, the fact of the many cars labeled SS, as noted, is probably why DMV just went ahead and issued the LSSSAH plate - it's not like its an obvious obscenity, which they do look out for. The plates were a (Nazi) groggy thing to do and another (non-Nazi) grog called them on it. They broke no laws, but they were not guys I'd invite to have a beer with me. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lars Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 And on the plus side, there's always the off chance they'll get rear ended by a JAP on a cell phone. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tero Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 By gunnergoz the LSSSAH plate - it's not like its an obvious obscenity, which they do look out for. Would you consider plate C1B20R11BR23D (similarly based on a unit designation) obviously obscene ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.