Jump to content

About US small arms


Axel

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 317
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by LT Mike:

Oh Ok! I have a buddy who's done two tours, and have met guys who've done three. Thats just absurd. Really wish the Army would transform to 7 month deployments.

I agree, although I understand the Army's deployment dilemmas. In my opinion, a unit's combat performance tends to peak at around 6 months, after that, a bunch of factors begin to take a toll.

The Marines also have been cycling units for 6 month floats routinely for decades, so adding in a similar deployment timeline is something Marines are institution ally used to doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by LT Mike:

Oh Ok! I have a buddy who's done two tours, and have met guys who've done three. Thats just absurd. Really wish the Army would transform to 7 month deployments.

I agree, although I understand the Army's deployment dilemmas. In my opinion, a unit's combat performance tends to peak at around 6 months, after that, a bunch of factors begin to take a toll.

The Marines also have been cycling units for 6 month floats routinely for decades, so adding in a similar deployment timeline is something Marines are institution ally used to doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by LT Mike:

Oh Ok! I have a buddy who's done two tours, and have met guys who've done three. Thats just absurd. Really wish the Army would transform to 7 month deployments.

I agree, although I understand the Army's deployment dilemmas. In my opinion, a unit's combat performance tends to peak at around 6 months, after that, a bunch of factors begin to take a toll.

The Marines also have been cycling units for 6 month floats routinely for decades, so adding in a similar deployment timeline is something Marines are institution ally used to doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by LT Mike:

Oh Ok! I have a buddy who's done two tours, and have met guys who've done three. Thats just absurd. Really wish the Army would transform to 7 month deployments.

I agree, although I understand the Army's deployment dilemmas. In my opinion, a unit's combat performance tends to peak at around 6 months, after that, a bunch of factors begin to take a toll.

The Marines also have been cycling units for 6 month floats routinely for decades, so adding in a similar deployment timeline is something Marines are institution ally used to doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by LT Mike:

Oh Ok! I have a buddy who's done two tours, and have met guys who've done three. Thats just absurd. Really wish the Army would transform to 7 month deployments.

I agree, although I understand the Army's deployment dilemmas. In my opinion, a unit's combat performance tends to peak at around 6 months, after that, a bunch of factors begin to take a toll.

The Marines also have been cycling units for 6 month floats routinely for decades, so adding in a similar deployment timeline is something Marines are institution ally used to doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by LT Mike:

Oh Ok! I have a buddy who's done two tours, and have met guys who've done three. Thats just absurd. Really wish the Army would transform to 7 month deployments.

I agree, although I understand the Army's deployment dilemmas. In my opinion, a unit's combat performance tends to peak at around 6 months, after that, a bunch of factors begin to take a toll.

The Marines also have been cycling units for 6 month floats routinely for decades, so adding in a similar deployment timeline is something Marines are institution ally used to doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Imperial Grunt:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Ariel:

Imperial Grunt,

you have a misquotation in your signature.

Don't worry, lot of people thinks it is true that Orwell wrote that.

****, I just got corrected by the little mermaid!

The internet can't be wrong, right? </font>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Imperial Grunt:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Ariel:

Imperial Grunt,

you have a misquotation in your signature.

Don't worry, lot of people thinks it is true that Orwell wrote that.

****, I just got corrected by the little mermaid!

The internet can't be wrong, right? </font>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Imperial Grunt:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Ariel:

Imperial Grunt,

you have a misquotation in your signature.

Don't worry, lot of people thinks it is true that Orwell wrote that.

****, I just got corrected by the little mermaid!

The internet can't be wrong, right? </font>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I know .357 or .44 mag is the way to "settle" things once and for all with one of the large animals. I figure .40cal has a chance of doing more than pissing it off, though. 9mm is for sure just going to annoy it. Hopefully I won't have to find out.

Moose are easy to avoid when in the rut and otherwise are usually very shy or even tame (which is why there is a 90% kill rate for moose hunting permits. If you see it you can kill it... some sport :rolleyes: ). Our bears are very shy and they avoid Humans miles before contact, unlike grizzlies. Thankfully, although I do literally have moose and bears in my back yard, no grizzlies to worry about. I think even a .50cal Barret might not be quite enough to drop one before it attempts to slice and dice :D

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I know .357 or .44 mag is the way to "settle" things once and for all with one of the large animals. I figure .40cal has a chance of doing more than pissing it off, though. 9mm is for sure just going to annoy it. Hopefully I won't have to find out.

Moose are easy to avoid when in the rut and otherwise are usually very shy or even tame (which is why there is a 90% kill rate for moose hunting permits. If you see it you can kill it... some sport :rolleyes: ). Our bears are very shy and they avoid Humans miles before contact, unlike grizzlies. Thankfully, although I do literally have moose and bears in my back yard, no grizzlies to worry about. I think even a .50cal Barret might not be quite enough to drop one before it attempts to slice and dice :D

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I know .357 or .44 mag is the way to "settle" things once and for all with one of the large animals. I figure .40cal has a chance of doing more than pissing it off, though. 9mm is for sure just going to annoy it. Hopefully I won't have to find out.

Moose are easy to avoid when in the rut and otherwise are usually very shy or even tame (which is why there is a 90% kill rate for moose hunting permits. If you see it you can kill it... some sport :rolleyes: ). Our bears are very shy and they avoid Humans miles before contact, unlike grizzlies. Thankfully, although I do literally have moose and bears in my back yard, no grizzlies to worry about. I think even a .50cal Barret might not be quite enough to drop one before it attempts to slice and dice :D

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Ariel:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Imperial Grunt:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Ariel:

Imperial Grunt,

you have a misquotation in your signature.

Don't worry, lot of people thinks it is true that Orwell wrote that.

****, I just got corrected by the little mermaid!

The internet can't be wrong, right? </font>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Ariel:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Imperial Grunt:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Ariel:

Imperial Grunt,

you have a misquotation in your signature.

Don't worry, lot of people thinks it is true that Orwell wrote that.

****, I just got corrected by the little mermaid!

The internet can't be wrong, right? </font>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Ariel:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Imperial Grunt:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Ariel:

Imperial Grunt,

you have a misquotation in your signature.

Don't worry, lot of people thinks it is true that Orwell wrote that.

****, I just got corrected by the little mermaid!

The internet can't be wrong, right? </font>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...