Dragonheart
Members-
Posts
1,113 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never
Everything posted by Dragonheart
-
Hi folks, Well, I played about 15 TCIP games SC 2 but i got bored. But that was not the fault of SC 2 alone i think i got bored from computerplaying during the summer time at all Now i started to play again..but guess...not SC 2 but SC 1. :eek: It´s hard to explain why i like SC 1 more ...maybe i like hextiles, maybe i miss this tricky french campagne of SC 1 ..where ppl invented so many openings. AFAIK there was much more stuff to discuss in SC1. SC 2 is IMO much more standard game play than SC 1 and even more luck. SC 2 is a good game but i miss the same feeling when playing SC1. m2c Greetings Dragonheart (Königstiger PL)
-
Many issues covered by the patch could have been eliminated with simple houserules. Apart from some bugs there was really no need for a patch, i dont understand why ppl always cry for a patch then for another patch and another patch. Hubert is not in the positon to say that but i would say...."This is the game take it or leave it" You all discussed months before about the game in the SC 2 Forum....hubert worked many ideas and wishes into the game.....to make the crowd love it. I m sick of all the whiners ....limit that, change that, this could be done.....etc....note that a patch is to eliminate serious bugs which cause a crash or make the game "really" unplayable. For all other issues change your gameplay, use the editor or make simple houserules. Isnt that difficult isnt it?
-
Iron Ranger VS Liam
Dragonheart replied to Liam's topic in Strategic Command 2 Blitzkrieg and Weapons and Warfare
Did i miss something? Russians have to combat Russians? A new partisan feature in the latest Patch? -
Done with SC2 already
Dragonheart replied to Yohan's topic in Strategic Command 2 Blitzkrieg and Weapons and Warfare
Liam, as hardcore EU 1+2 player you should also look forward to EU 3, HOI 1+2 were also damn good games. If you like Napoleonic games you should also take a look at crown of glory, a similar game will come soon it´s called Empire in arms a classic boardgame on computer version....both have a bit the flair of EU. -
Done with SC2 already
Dragonheart replied to Yohan's topic in Strategic Command 2 Blitzkrieg and Weapons and Warfare
As you can see above even betatesters are out of order. Maybe he tries to be funny but all he can is brainless mothering. Ey man write a book and save as from scrolling through your pointless posts. Oh i m offtopic it seems. :eek: -
Done with SC2 already
Dragonheart replied to Yohan's topic in Strategic Command 2 Blitzkrieg and Weapons and Warfare
With 10 ontopic posts and 100 offtopic crapposts i wonder why this tread is still open. Seems that moon or madmatt is on holiday. -
Blashy Vs Jollyguy, AAR
Dragonheart replied to Jollyguy's topic in Strategic Command 2 Blitzkrieg and Weapons and Warfare
Well, so far i had never probs with taking stalingrad...and dont forget i play with HT 2 and IW 1 limit so it´s even harder to take. But i can imagine if you consider stalingrad as a key in the game it will be a though battle. A bomber for germany is nice and a matter of your taste i would rather buy two AF´s instead of one bomber. But i have to admit bombing a city to zero supply and then taking is making sense. -
Blashy Vs Jollyguy, AAR
Dragonheart replied to Jollyguy's topic in Strategic Command 2 Blitzkrieg and Weapons and Warfare
One cant see everything MPP wise. And by cutting off Leningrad and linking Finnland behind Leningrad the difference is only 10 MPP. -
Blashy Vs Jollyguy, AAR
Dragonheart replied to Jollyguy's topic in Strategic Command 2 Blitzkrieg and Weapons and Warfare
I wonder why most players put so many efforts to take Leningrad. IMO it´s a waste of time and it´s messing up the axis timeschedule which is .. -1941 border cities,southern mines,city east of the mines, moskov -1942 Rostov, Stalingrad -1943 Sverdlovsk If weather is bad and things running nasty you will need one year more. Leningrad does not have the importance like in SC 1 where it is important as ressource center due linked Finland, to penentrate deeper into russia. Also the 10 MPP in comparison to 20 MPP´s doesnt justify any efforts to capture it. If you cut it off this should be enough but this depends if the russian player is going for finland. I dont have the patch yet but i dont think that it would change the overall strategy. Just my 2 cents. -
@Blashy Why this limits are terrible? They are valid for both sides. In that way you will need not only one unit to kill another unit but maybe up to 3 like in SC 1. I did not recommand to play with this limits its just a test from my side to make the game a bit more strategically. Meanwhile i have finished 2 of this low tech games and they proved to be very interesting long-term-games decided in 1945. IMO the attack values make SC 2 to a slugfest the one bringing more units into the field in one certain spot wins the battle and mostly the game. Concerning your entrenched IW 3 russians..you can forget them ..i hit them with 3 Air first then with a tank and any minor unit is finishing them off. With no tech limits the germans will get moskov in latest 1942, Stalingrad in 1943 and Sverdlovsk in 1944 .....the west....well ...the first time they can really involve in the war is mid 1943 with USA entry mid 1942.
-
I like the idea but for SC 1...i would buy 4 stars carriers right from the start. Nah frankly in SC 2 it is really sensless to have trained troops they are killed like any other units with one shot. In one game i had a 3 bar tank, i loved him so much that i made him an overstrengh unit (13) and never used him in combat.
-
Storyline seems to be similar to Europa Universalis I+II and to Victoria which are RT games not turnbased. @ Rambo Btw Hungary is left of Romania but also right of Austria...europeans not only learn all about all countries of the world they even learn the the name of all states in the usa in school. If you read this thank your forfathers for stealing the land from the indians and that you have to learn nothing about the **** in other countries and thank the SC community that keep you informed what is happening elsewhere.
-
Sealion
Dragonheart replied to Fartknock3r's topic in Strategic Command 2 Blitzkrieg and Weapons and Warfare
It´s not a matter of price it´s a matter of range....whilst the usa has to ship all their armies over the whole atlantic other countries have just to jump into the boat and land somewhere else... IMO a limitation according to countries would be the best solution.....f.e. US range 10, UK range 8, Germany,Russia,Italy range 6 ...minors range 4. Edit: @Sombra imagine Allied player has a low move limit for shipping all the stuff over the atlantic....1st of all it would last ages, then the stuff is loosing org,moral,readyness and finally when they can land they are totally exhausted with terrible battleresults.....therefore my opinion to scale it according to countries.