Cameroon

Yeah, I'm hoping that makes it back. I really enjoyed looking back after a battle and "congratulating" those that did well

Well, but what if you don't speak English and the word for Move doesn't start with an M? I understand why they went the way that they did, but the keys to go directly to a particular tab (as noted above) are not convenient.

Actually you can go directly to the pane that you want: b = movement n = combat p = special (don't know if there is one for admin) I discovered them entirely by accident - don't think I saw them in the manual.

D'oh, in all the text I didn't see the surrender and didn't think to keep looking after the weird objectives result. Thanks

Is this an instance of the victory being triggered because the other forces give up? If so, maybe it should say something to that effect. Either way, the results screen has conflicting information. Pictures to illustrate below: To explain, in the 1st image you can see I'm not near phase line Beta or Charlie. In the second, however, it says that I secured them. Also, for the Syrians it says that they did NOT lose control of PL Beta and Charlie.

Yeah, I'm still getting used to the key command structure too Plus the manual is wrong about the Next and Previous command panels; it is T and Y not P and ; It isn't that it doesn't make sense, but I have to train myself to think "top row, u i o," etc.

There's something else at work on your system then, because I have almost literally that same system (2.1 Ghz and GT instead of GTX) and it plays smoothly even at the "Better" detail level at 1280x1024.

Running fine on: Core 2 Duo @ 2.13 GHz 2 GB RAM GeForce 7950 GT w/ 512 MB RAM WinXP SP2 I've got texture quality at best, AA and AF on and I fiddle with the detail during game play depending on what's going on. Playing at Improved or Better. Played the tutorial and started the TF Thunder campaign.

Gotta say, kinda with Toleran on this. Even the west coast of the US has been awake for a bit now, so it isn't just "let them sleep normal hours" or something. There's no much point to purchasing straight from BF since they seem to not get the digital versions up until much later in the day than their partners. *shrug* Ah well.

Paradox didn't jump anything here. Actually, I think BFC should have put the 1.01 patch up sometime yesterday simply because Paradox box owners were going to have their game hours before BFC even got up this morning

I imagine it'll come online at the same point as the downloads go active for the download product. Seems we ALL want BFC up and turning stuff on

I can sympathize with not opening up the d/ls at midnight (who wants to stay up all night babysitting that?!), but at least start it up early! It's frustrating that the boxed copy is actually available first (if you're in a country where the boxed copy is being sold anyway). Seems counter-intuitive

Vehicles don't block LOS though (unless that's quietly been changed).

Vehicles don't block LOS though (unless that's quietly been changed).

Vehicles don't block LOS though (unless that's quietly been changed).

I take it the responsibility to release a game for going to the DVD presses of the publisher is with the developer no ? And if the reviewer gets exactly the same version the customer gets out of his box the reviewer is in the position to write a fair review no ? cheers [/QB]</font>

Still you will see a lot of complaints about this 1.0 version. Something that should have been avoided in the first place. 1 month more work into the game and you most likely would have avoided all these negative waves from reviews already out. cheers </font>

Actually the version which went out to the revievers was the 1.0 version. Exactly that version went out to the publisher for global release too. Exactly that version you will find on the shelves in stores and exactly that version will be the one most people on the world base their judgement on. Now tell me what went wrong here ? cheers </font>

dear god, that color combination made my eyes bleed jruddy.

As I understood it there is no randomly generated strat AI (I may have missed something). The map designer has to create some kind of very general plan that should work tolerably for more or less any force mix for each of attack, defense, ME. </font>

My only question would be... what makes you think that there won't be absolutely tons of scenarios just like there has for the previous CM games without micropayments?

I guess I was just rehashing the only bits I'd heard from BFC on the subject of QBs, none of which was hostile to the concept thereof

dalem, I can't say that I've heard anything that implies that from BFC. There are plenty of "my way or the highway" comments from forum members, but then, there always are Really the difference for QBs are these: 1. No random map generation 2. Due to #1, QBs must be played on maps that have been created by you or the community. 3. Because there aren't "victory flags", QBs will need a little direction. So instead of generating a Allied Defense map, you'd pick a map set up for an Allied defense. You still purchase your units and the AI purchases its. Just because I understand why there aren't any auto-generated maps doesn't mean I wouldn't like to have them

I thought the only thing with Vista was related to Vista 64 bit with an NVIDIA 8800?

My personal gfx card of choice right now is the NVIDIA 7950 GT (512 MB version). It's what I recommend to my friends that aren't getting Vista or don't care about DX10 yet.