Waycool

Ummmm I not really sure to be honest but if BF had the OOB there with the proper war establishment it would be appreciated perhaps in a later module. I am itching to lay my hands on the release to try it out.

IMHO I think the force structure of British Army Commandos and RM Commandos has enough difference from Airborne and Infantry to warrant the inclusion. http://www.bayonetstrength.150m.com/British/british_commando.htm US Army Rangers have also a tweaked out OOB TOE http://www.bayonetstrength.150m.com/UnitedStates/united_states_army_ranger_battal.htm The quality of the troops would be crack. Just my two cents.

I too hope we see these formations. The more varied the force structure the better IMHO.

We have to be close as they said 14-21 days from the April 20th Mac osx announcement 21 days is tomorrow. We are so close I can taste it ;P

Blasphemy the British and Commonwealth (Canada) and other assorted Allies plus Waffen SS and Fallschirmjager is next

Thanks for posting a neat comparison I am on the edge of my seat. Cry Havoc!, and let slip the dogs of war

Hear hear!

This is a very interesting article about these two formations blooded in Normandy. Cardonville was a very interesting battle. http://www.wlu.ca/lcmsds/cmh/back%20issues/CMH/volume%203/issue%201/Haller%20-%20The%20Defeat%20of%20the%2012th%20SS%207-10%20June%201944.pdf

What's that sonny? speak up I can't hear you. Where are those damn batteries for my hearing aid>? 46 here.

DAG and you cannot go wrong Ausf D A G and lastly they were prototyping the Panther Ausf F. And the handy link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panther_tank

Awwww tube guy, gotta love him that crazy jumping bastard

Yeeeees! http://www.battlefront.com/index.php?option=com_flippingbook&book_id=19

The over concentration of force is totally a player controlled item in gaming. If frontage distances are maintained you could certainly keep fair distances for maneuvering of platoons/troops. Defining an axis of advance and defense are certainly in this realm and in this regard terrain avenue of approaches, masking, flanking etc. all can be observed. The players can ramp up the level of rigid game play or simply play it as a game. In the end once you breech the defenses you want to exploit the gap with as much concentration of force feeding as much firepower to capture and hold ground as well as prepare for the sure to follow counterattack.

Check em out here 3 videos in this thread video 1 RT http://www.battlefront.com/community/showthread.php?t=95908 2nd RT VAAR thread here http://www.battlefront.com/community/showthread.php?t=95939 3 wego video http://www.battlefront.com/community/showthread.php?t=95970

Thanks Chris I really have enjoyed your VAARs.

Was that on a TRP (target ref point) Clark? They are able to respond with fire quickly as they are preregistered with your supporting units.

Stand down I repeat stand down. We are now at Defcon 4

Today my Malwarebytes started flagging the missioneditor.exe as a backdoor.bot infestation/ Anyone else having any flags or warnings? Maybe a false positive Avast! is saying dir is clean.

Map overlay Belgium ww2 era using Google mapping and British GSGS survey maps. http://geo.nls.uk/maps/belgium/index.html A blurb from site: Belgium - Second World War military mapping - geo-referenced mosaics These maps were created by the Geographical Section of the General Staff (GSGS) and were used by the Allies during the Second World War. These georeferenced and mosaiced layers were created as part of a project on military aerial imagery held by The Aerial Reconnaissance Archives, based at RCAHMS. GSGS 4042 (1:250,000) - 1937-42. This series is a revised version of a First World War map. The information gathered from aerial reconnaissance imagery was added to most areas. In the remaining areas, alterations were based on the best available French, Belgian and Dutch maps. GSGS 4336 (1:100,000) - 1942-43. This series is a revised version of a First World War map. Information was mainly gathered from French 1:80.000 and Belgian 1:40.000 map series. Particular attention was paid, using aerial reconnaissance imagery, to the revision of railways and roads. GSGS 4040 (1:50,000) - 1943-44. This series was first prepared in 1938-1939. The sheet lines of this series are unlike other 1:50.000 series and have no relationship to any local series either French or Belgian. The sheets which cover Belgium were compiled from local 1:20.000 and 1:40.000 series maps. GSGS (1:250,000 - 1:50,000) - 1937-42. This is a user friendly visualization and shows all three series as listed above in one application. Every series is visible at a different zoom level. http://geo.nls.uk/maps/belgium/index.html

Agree when a tank is on the battlefield and you the opfor have zero or limited AT capability "any" armour is a concern. The Allies never fielded a tank with the rep that is attached to the German heavies.Tiger, 88, Nebelwerfer were feared.

I thought the Jabos were the stuff of dread for the Jerries, They feared this above all the Tommy Cooker was not feared.

Welcome back Peter I remember your involvement in the forum way back in the day. Happy gaming. Cheers.

hehe Be damned the shrubbery it will be in highest tree taunting him for days

hehe Hey I did it last night you are not alone.

Thanks for the post Chris this was quite an intense battle. CMBN looks super I cannot wait, release the hounds