aka_tom_w

What level of FOW were you playing? someone at BFC will be keen to try to replicate that crash if you can give as many specifics as possible? (they may however want to take this weekend off for a change.... and who can blame them.) FOW? your System Specs Paradox or BFC version? Can you make it crash again at the same time by doing the same thing? (is it replicate-able? replicable?)

which scenario or scenario's look the best or the prettiest in the v1.03? I would like to find one I don't know about (I have only play tested a few like Ash Shammas ) I don't care about the forces or winning or losing I would just like a few hints or pointers to check out some new scenarios that are more spectular (visually) now in v1.03 thanks [ August 31, 2007, 05:19 AM: Message edited by: aka_tom_w ]

is that in v1.03 since the patch? They might be looking or a few more specifics about your issue.

Hey Gpig, You are going to love it! -tom w

If you never have any expectations you will never be disappointed.

v1.03 patch should be available for download sometime later today, The Creator said.... [ August 30, 2007, 08:35 AM: Message edited by: aka_tom_w ]

ah so battlefront is US based then ? for some reason i always assumed it was eastern european based or german. </font>

I think friendly fire from aircraft is accuratly modelled. "Does CMSF use any sort of IFF system, and also why do aircraft do bombing and straffing outside their designated target areas (including way off map)despite having HQ units observing the target zone?" Human Error Pilots and JTAC still make mistakes In testing this game I was pleasantly surprised ato see how easy it was to have an air strike take out our own men and vehicles. These errors are modeled realistically in the game IMHO, the game would far to sanitary and the air strikes FAR too precise if every time you called one in you could know with %100 certianty that it would magically only target the bad guys. The current system in v1.03 may show some improvement for you and works perfectly fine for me. [ August 30, 2007, 04:29 AM: Message edited by: aka_tom_w ]

It was prone to sparking threads about how much CMSF sucks... Mord. </font>

the issue with the Javelin was related to accuracy I think... It missed sometimes, (too many times) so I think it is being corrected and tested and retested. [ August 29, 2007, 06:03 PM: Message edited by: aka_tom_w ]

Hopefully this behaviour will be fixed when v1.03 comes out

you might want to give the title of the thread a new name "defensive smoke discharge damages nearby Stykers" or something specific like that to your bug report interesting...

maybe tomorrow

bump

RAM for sure

Get your stinking paws off of me, you damn filthy ape! </font>

bootcamp is free and it works Runs Windows (at your own expense) on the Intel Chip and games mostly run fine. Why mess with it?

that sounds right to me... sorry

Thanks Pzman I am working on it now

"couple of days at the most" um Maybe this is day 0 maybe tomorrow or the day after maybe [ August 28, 2007, 06:49 PM: Message edited by: aka_tom_w ]

as a guy who watches these things with a keen eye, I would be surprised if we do not see the 1.03 patch with in the next 7 days. (sooner rather then later) Very surprised indeed. patience grasshopper [ August 24, 2007, 04:03 PM: Message edited by: aka_tom_w ]

Is there an existing thread here about how to parition an intel Mac Book Pro for windows XP and playing Windoze games? I know some of the basics like the disk has to be partitioned, but I would like to hear from folks who have done it who could direct me to step by step instructions for setting up the computer (with details and tech specs) to install Windows XP so there would be no new problems for playing CMSF on my new laptop with the NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT with 256MB of GDDR3 SDRAM Is anyone running that video card on an intel Mac with Windows XP? any suggestions or advice? (googling now for web pages and web sites that tell mac Guys how to set up intel Macs to play PC games!) thanks -tom w [ August 24, 2007, 05:11 PM: Message edited by: aka_tom_w ]

Hunt also should be known as "Move to Contact" if the attacker moves, and comes in contact with the enemy he stops. AND, Hopefully the TAC AI when it works right tells them to seek cover and return fire. BUT I would say I don't think HUNT will let you move and shoot at the same time, that is what Assault is for.

TCP/IP with WEGO and replay is missing, that is the point, some military training "interests" want it in for training and demo purposes. Chances are I hope we might see it someday. right?

qualified yes the game needs patching as has been suggested