Jump to content
Special Upgrade 4 Tech Tips

Redmarkus

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    51

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Redmarkus

  1. Redmarkus
    Thanks! Downloading now.
  2. Redmarkus
    I find the foxhole spotting in woods a bit too easy. As soon as my troops spot one, and before they've been fired on, I immediately plaster it with HE rounds. If the hole is occupied, I often spot infantry after firing a few rounds at it; either they pop up or they run. In training, I've walked right through a platoon position in woods without seeing a thing. It doesn't take more than half a day to dig in and conceal to that degree in the right terrain... On the other hand, I think that troops hastily dug in in open terrain should be spotted more easily than they are in CM. Having said that, it would be good if the AI used the reverse slope more often, rather then always digging in on the crest.
  3. Redmarkus
    Things went well for me until this mission. I've been forced to restart the campaign. Spoiler below in white text. Highlight to read: After choosing the rest option and the no-fuel option in Stavelot, I took my entire force around the right flank at Stoumont, in order to occupy the high ground and deal with as many allied AFVs as possible from range. I actually made it along the muddy track and through the woods with only two bogged vehicles. However, allied infantry in the woods and very accurate enemy mortar fire caused crippling losses to my infantry. I feel that the allied opposition builds up too quickly. IIRC, Peiper had more problems with engineers blowing bridges under his nose and having to find new routes than with organized defenders at this early stage, but maybe I'm wrong. Perhaps the designers decide to skip the 'boring' minor events and focus on the larger engagements. I'd have liked to have a few recon platoon-sized 'race for the bridge in 10 minutes' scenarios early on though...
  4. Redmarkus
  5. Redmarkus
    Hi George. Can you point me to this scenario by SeinfieldRules please? I've done a couple of searches here, on Google, and at A Few Good Men with no luck. Ta!
  6. Redmarkus
    Great news indeed!
  7. Redmarkus
    Weather was mixed, so we stuck to forest walks not far from Elgin and the beach - lots of seals spotted, without US Navy ID. Took a drive round Loch Ness, as you do... Also met a bunch of very gung-ho Turkish F16 pilots on the base and had a look at their aircraft. What's next in your CM plans? I find the large battles in most campaigns too unwieldy; I never rose above Company command in real life. I'd love to play a semi-historical company-sized Axis campaign (with atts and dets) that follows a panzer unit from, say, 1943 to 1945. I could help with ideas, but probably not much more than that.
  8. Redmarkus
    Unfortunately, in my experience, it was always the most senior officer in the unit who assumed command, not the most competent.
  9. Redmarkus
    I've just taken Stavelot and I have to say that, so far, this campaign feels like the best Battlefront have ever produced. The battles are challenging yet very convincing in terms of a realistic balance and the maps are works of art, as are the units. The series is really maturing now and I'm really looking forward to playing what I imagine will be a flood of player developed campaigns or BF add-ons, given the setting and the number of units that took their own paths through the region historically. Bastogne, St Vith, 2nd Panzer's drive towards the Meuse, the battle for Elsenborn Ridge, the VG attacks on the southern shoulder of the bulge, are all yet to be covered as campaigns, so I expect we have a lot to look forward to.
  10. Redmarkus
    You're very welcome. I hold those willing to devote time and energy to creating CM scenarios in high regard; I've tried a few times, but always gave up in the end. Just returned from a week in Scotland, by the way (Edinburgh and Elgin). Fantastic place.
  11. Redmarkus
    My reply is also in white lettering: When you setup with your Tigers on the rightmost high ground (all of them), immediately order them to reverse away from the crest and then hunt forward to hull down positions facing the village. Open the hatches and spot for a minute and you'll soon start engaging T34s at range. I didn't move any Tigers into the village itself. Beware of AI flanking moves against your Tigers on the ridge! This happens consistently and must be written in the AI plan. Keep the Stugs stationary in the area of dead ground in which they arrive and give them ambush orders. Don't move them or use them to engage the enemy until the Tigers have destroyed the bulk of the enemy force, unless an AI tank happens by and offers a rear shot. By so doing, you should be able to win this battle with zero losses.
  12. Redmarkus
    Thanks George. Looking forward to playing it again as it represents what I regard as the perfect CM scenario in terms of scale, situation and force mix.
  13. Redmarkus
    Many thanks for this! I found six campaigns I'd never even heard of before in your folders!!!
  14. Redmarkus
    The devs must have Macs for testing issues, surely, since they've released a Mac version...???
  15. Redmarkus
    I'm sorry - forgot about the save game requirement, but I see that others are having the same problem/challenge. In my case, the Stugs were not in the town proper but about 100m from it. They were facing the enemy, as far as I could tell, unless there were hidden AI infantry on a flank. The two main concerns, as cited above, are: 1. Stugs ignoring the button command. For close defence, let the player decide whether to unbutton or not. 2. Other crew members committing suicide after the machine gunner has already been killed with his head out of the hatch.
  16. Redmarkus
    I'm playing the demo and loving it. Really great work. Just one minor observation so far. I seem to be suffering much higher tank crew losses to small arms fire when buttoned up than I'm used to. Has this been adjusted and, if so, how realistic is it? My Stug crews in the third scenario offered suffered a number of such casualties, not only commanders but gunners too. One Stug lost two crewmen in this fashion; with two crewmen remaining, it was able to move but not fire...
  17. Redmarkus
    I just played this excellent scenario. However, perhaps the points settings need some adjustment? The AI surrendered with 40 minutes remaining on the clock, but I only got a major victory, despite suffering zero losses. The failed parameter was 'friendly casualties'...
  18. Redmarkus
    I doubt I'm the first to raise this, but the poor quality of vehicle navigation ruins this game for me: - Vehicles seem to be unable to simply follow a road through the woods and end up meandering through the trees. - Drivers keep on bumping into those meandering vehicles to their front. Other games have effective 'follow the road' orders (which should be default, no?) Why not this one?
  19. Redmarkus
    Can anyone tell me how to stop my email address from showing up in my posts? I have messed around in the account profile settings, but can't seem to fix that
  20. Redmarkus
    Excellent AAR - definitely convinced me to buy the game. My only negative was near the start where the US voices start that "Secure the flanks" nonsense that's been there since CMx1. My first task once I get the game will be to try and mod the voices.
  21. Redmarkus
    Great AAR. Gave me a really good feel for the game. I didn't find the tank motion effects at all off putting, though I do agree that the tank crew's infantry combat abilities are disconcerting. For a future video AAR, if there's time prior to release, maybe you could try locking the view to an interesting unit (say a Panther or a Sherman) and with the camera at ground level just let the recording follow the unit for 30 seconds or so. The same can be done unit-by-unit so that you get more of a 'film' effect. If you pause to issue commands, then resume recording in this lock to unit mode, you might end up with a nice little CMBN 'documentary'
  22. Redmarkus
    I have no problem with the re-enactors as such, but I recall watching the film Gettysburg, which I was really enjoying, and then suddenly seeing a number of grossly overweight 'Confederate infantrymen' who had supposedly just marched barefoot all the way up from Virginia over dirt roads and mountain passes. It totally put me off an otherwise excellent film! For some reason, the Union troops in the film had a lot less weight on... Maybe the person responsible for casting had a grudge?
  23. Redmarkus
    Exactly my point - you have to marry into the family. Doesn't matter if you own every Battlefront game ever published. That's why you get moaners in the forums - it's their only outlet
  24. Redmarkus
    That's basically what I was trying to say How does one become a beta tester anyway? Do you need to marry someone's sister? (I'm single. Well, not married anyway. Legally single... ) I've signed up for umpteen beta test teams and never even had a reply. They don't even turn me down - just silence!
  25. Redmarkus
    I'm so bored with most of the games out there that I would happily pay to get the Beta version of this excellent looking title. Why don't you offer the hardcore fans a discount and generate some revenue now? I would even pay for an 'upgrade' to the retail release, as long as you keep the pricing sensible, so you'd not lose a single cent and your cash flow would be improved...
×
×
  • Create New...