Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • Battlefront.com

      Special Upgrade 4 Tech Tips   12/27/2016

      Hi all! Now that Upgrade 4 is out and about in large quantities we have now discovered a few SNAFUs that happen out in the scary, real world that is home computing.  Fortunately the rate of problems is extremely small and so far most are easily worked around.  We've identified a few issues that have similar causes which we have clear instructions for work arounds here they are: 1.  CMRT Windows customers need to re-license their original key.  This is a result of improvements to the licensing system which CMBN, CMBS, and CMFB are already using.  To do this launch CMRT with the Upgrade and the first time enter your Engine 4 key.  Exit and then use the "Activate New Products" shortcut in your CMRT folder, then enter your Engine 3 license key.  That should do the trick. 2.  CMRT and CMBN MacOS customers have a similar situation as #2, however the "Activate New Products" is inside the Documents folder in their respective CM folders.  For CMBN you have to go through the process described above for each of your license keys.  There is no special order to follow. 3.  For CMBS and CMFB customers, you need to use the Activate New Products shortcut and enter your Upgrade 4 key.  If you launch the game and see a screen that says "LICENSE FAILURE: Base Game 4.0 is required." that is an indication you haven't yet gone through that procedure.  Provided you had a properly functioning copy before installing the Upgrade, that should be all you need to do.  If in the future you have to install from scratch on a new system you'll need to do the same procedure for both your original license key and your Upgrade 4.0 key. 4.  There's always a weird one and here it is.  A few Windows users are not getting "Activate New Products" shortcuts created during installation.  Apparently anti-virus software is preventing the installer from doing its job.  This might not be a problem right now, but it will prove to be an issue at some point in the future.  The solution is to create your own shortcut using the following steps: Disable your anti-virus software before you do anything. Go to your Desktop, right click on the Desktop itself, select NEW->SHORTCUT, use BROWSE to locate the CM EXE that you are trying to fix. The location is then written out. After it type in a single space and then paste this:

      -showui

      Click NEXT and give your new Shortcut a name (doesn't matter what). Confirm that and you're done. Double click on the new Shortcut and you should be prompted to license whatever it is you need to license. At this time we have not identified any issues that have not been worked around.  Let's hope it stays that way Steve
    • Battlefront.com

      Forum Reorganization   10/12/2017

      We've reorganized our Combat Mission Forums to reflect the fact that most of you are now running Engine 4 and that means you're all using the same basic code.  Because of that, there's no good reason to have the discussion about Combat Mission spread out over 5 separate sets of Forums.  There is now one General Discussion area with Tech Support and Scenario/Mod Tips sub forums.  The Family specific Tech Support Forums have been moved to a new CM2 Archives area and frozen in place. You might also notice we dropped the "x" from distinguishing between the first generation of CM games and the second.  The "x" was reluctantly adopted back in 2005 or so because at the time we had the original three CM games on European store shelves entitled CM1, CM2, and CM3 (CMBO, CMBB, and CMAK).  We didn't want to cause confusion so we added the "x".  Time has moved on and we have to, so the "x" is now gone from our public vocabulary as it has been from our private vocabulary for quite a while already.  Side note, Charles *NEVER* used the "x" so now we're all speaking the same language as him.  Which is important since he is the one programming them

Recommended Posts

Does CM2 portray Jäger Division infantry type units or have they not been added? I see selections for Panzerjäger battalion under German Army: Infantry, but wasn't sure how you'd portray the infantry part of the formation. For instance the 114th Jäger Division's OOB looks like this:

  • Jäger Regiment 721
  • Jäger Regiment 741
  • Reconnaissance Battalion 114
  • Artillery Regiment 661
  • Pionier Battalion 114
  • Panzerjäger Battalion 114
  • Signals Battalion 114
  • Reserve Battalion 114
  • Supply detachment 114

What formation would you use to represent a piece of say the 721st Regiment; elements from a normal Grenadier Battalion? Pioneer, Panzerjäger, and Supply all have obvious choices in the editor.

 

Mord.

Edited by Mord

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not yet, but on paper the Jäger Battalion it is very similar to the Gebirgsjäger Battalion.  Other divisional units are the same as Gebirgsjäger or regular infantry divisions.  No connection to Panzerjäger units, which is a term used for all tank destroyer formations (but the Panzerjäger battalion in a Jäger or Gebirgsjäger division was the same as that in a regular infantry division).

 

Edited by akd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JÄGER REGIMENT

Jäger Battalion (Feb 44  - end)

                Battalion HQ  KStN 111a Stb.Jg.Btl. (December 1, 1943) – organized same as Grenadier Battalion HQ 

                3x Jäger Company  KStN 131a Jg. Kp. (December 1, 1943) modified for small arms allocation

                                Company HQ – 1x Officer (MP40), 2x NCO (MP40), 1x radioman (rifle or MP40), 3x men (rifle or MP40)

                                3x Jäger Platoon

      Platoon HQ – 1x Officer (NCO for 2. And 3. Platoon) (MP40), 1x radioman (rifle or MP40), 2x men (rifle or MP40)

                                    3x Jäger Squad - 1x NCO (MP40), 1x gunner (LMG 34/42), 2x men (self-loading rifle or rifle), 1x man (scoped rifle or rifle), 1x man (grenade launcher), 4x men (rifle or MP40)

          Panzerschreck Team (from Regimental Panzerjäger Company) – 1x man (Panzerschreck), 1x man (rifle or MP40, panzerschreck ammo)

     Jäger M.G. Company  KStN 151 M.G.Kp.Jg.Btl. (December 1, 1943) modified for small arms allocation

                                Company HQ – 1x Officer (MP40), 1x NCO (MP40), 1x radioman (rifle or MP40), 2x men (rifle or MP40)

                                3x Heavy Machine Gun Platoon

          Platoon HQ – 1x Officer (NCO in 3. Platoon) (MP40), 1x radioman (rifle or MP40), 3x men (rifle or MP40)

          2x Heavy Machine Gun Sections

       Section HQ Team - 1x NCO section ldr (MP40), 1x NCO (MP40), 1 x gunner (HMG 34/42), 1x man/loader (pistol), 3x men (rifle or MP40)

       Heavy Machine Gun Team – 1x NCO ldr (MP40), 1 x gunner (HMG 34/42), 1x man/loader (pistol), 3x men (rifle or MP40)

                                                       2x Ammo Bearer Team – 2x men (2x rifle or MP40, MG ammo)

                Jäger Heavy Company  KStN 155a s.Kp.Jg.Btl (December 1, 1943) modified for small arms allocation

                                Company HQ – 1x Officer (MP40), 1x NCO (MP40), 1x radioman (rifle or MP40), 2x men (rifle or MP40), 2x men (rifle)

                                Infantry Gun Platoon

                Platoon HQ – 1x Officer (MP40), 1x NCO (pistol), 1x radioman (rifle or MP40), 1x man (pistol)

                1x LMG Team – 1x gunner (LMG 34/42), 1x man (rifle, MG ammo)

      2x Gebirgs IG Team – 1x NCO ldr (MP40), 3x men (rifles), 1x 7.5 cm Gebirgs le.IG 18 / le. IG 18 / le. IG 37), 1x Kettenrad (Kettenrads are used extensively throughout Gebirgs TO&E, but I’ve only listed them here, as they are directly called for as the towing vehicle.  Not sure what to substitute.  Maybe just Kubelwagen?)

          4x Ammo Bearer Team – 2x men (rifles, 7.5cm IG ammo)

                                Medium Mortar Platoon

                                               Platoon HQ - 1x Officer (MP40), 1x man (rifle or MP40), 1x radioman (rifle or MP40), 1x man (pistol)

                                               3x 8cm Mortar Section –

                   Section HQ – 1x NCO ldr (MP40), 1x NCO (pistol), 1x NCO (MP40), 1x radioman (rifle or MP40), 2x men (rifle or MP40)

                   2x 8cm Mortar Team – 5x men (1x MP40, 2x rifle, 2x pistol, radio, 1x 8cm mortar)

                   2x Ammo Bearer Team – 2x men (2x rifles, mortar ammo)

                                Heavy Mortar Platoon

          Platoon HQ – 1x Officer (MP40), 1x NCO (pistol), 1x radioman (rifle or MP40), 1x man (pistol), 1x Kubelwagen + driver (pistol)

                                              4x 12cm mortar [off-map]

 

Regimental Pioneer Company (Feb 44  - end) - KStN 189 Inf.Pi.Ko.Jg.Rgt (December 1, 1943) modified for small arms allocation

                  Company HQ - 1x Officer (NCO in 3. Platoon)(MP40), 1x NCO (MP40), 1x radioman (rifle or MP40), 1x man (rifle or MP40), 1x Kubelwagen + driver (rifle)

                                3x Pioneer Platoon -          

                                               Platoon HQ – 1x Officer (NCO in 3. Platoon) (MP40), 1x radioman (rifle or MP40), 1x man (rifle or MP40), 1x Kubelwagen + driver (rifle)

           3x Pioneer Squads – 1x NCO (MP40), 1x gunner (LMG 34/42), 1x pioneer (self-loading rifle or rifle), 7x pioneer (rifle or MP40)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, akd said:

Platoon HQ – 1x Officer (NCO for 2. And 3. Platoon) (MP40), 1x radioman (rifle or MP40), 2x men (rifle or MP40)

                                    3x Jäger Squad - 1x NCO (MP40), 1x gunner (LMG 34/42), 2x men (self-loading rifle or rifle), 1x man (scoped rifle or rifle), 1x man (grenade launcher), 4x men (rifle or MP40)

          Panzerschreck Team (from Regimental Panzerjäger Company) – 1x man (Panzerschreck), 1x man (rifle or MP40, panzerschreck ammo)

     Jäger M.G. Company  KStN 151 M.G.Kp.Jg.Btl. (December 1, 1943) modified for small arms allocation

That's the part I was most interested in. I got curious while I was researching for my portrait mod.

I am guessing as obsessive (in a good way) as Steve is, we'll see an actual Jäger formation? I'd expect in the new FI module as the 114th was in Italy. Not to mention, if they ever make partisans for RT, gonna need some hunters to take them down.

BTW Any idea what a Lei Division is? Google translate is screwing me on that one!

Thanks, man!

 

Mord.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't catch this part:

2 hours ago, akd said:

(but the Panzerjäger battalion in a Jäger or Gebirgsjäger division was the same as that in a regular infantry division).

Yeah, the Panzerjäger battalion I was referring to was from the Heer infantry, it only has towed guns for AT capabilities. That's what got me wondering about the infantry.

 

Mord.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lei. is short for Leicht (or Light). The only lei division I can find doing a quick google is the 5th who were part of the Afrika Corps in '41. And it later became the 21st Panzer Division.

Edited by Warts 'n' all

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, man. I've Light Divisions but never connected the "lei" part and "light". I see that they ended up becoming Pz Divisions later on.

 

Mord.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just as an aside. The Germans used lei. for the light divisions, but le. for light guns. I suppose some bloke came into work on a Monday morning after spending the whole weekend on the Berliner Kindl Weisse, and thought, "Oh, I just can't be bothered with the "i" this morning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Warts 'n' all said:

Lei. is short for Leicht (or Light). The only lei division I can find doing a quick google is the 5th who were part of the Afrika Corps in '41. And it later became the 21st Panzer Division.

Yeah there were a few more but they quickly fell by the wayside for the Germans. They were too light and too independent to get anything done; and were in reality over-grown mechanized regiments. 

@akd I'm really surprised to see a Jaeger TO&E as late as Feburary 44. I thought that all infantry divisions had the honorific Grenadier (or Volksgrenadier later on) save for "specialist" divisions. It's so rare to hear mention of them in histories after Stalingrad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Rinaldi said:

Yeah there were a few more but they quickly fell by the wayside for the Germans. They were too light and too independent to get anything done; and were in reality over-grown mechanized regiments.

Yes, you're spot on. I found the others a bit later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Rinaldi said:

Yeah there were a few more but they quickly fell by the wayside for the Germans. They were too light and too independent to get anything done; and were in reality over-grown mechanized regiments.

There were several used during the Polish campaign, but were found to be inadequate to their assigned tasks. They were basically supposed to be demi-Panzer divisions with half the number of tanks etc. By the time of the campaign against France and the Low Countries, most of them had been built up into more or less full Panzer divisions.

Michael

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Mord said:

That's the part I was most interested in. I got curious while I was researching for my portrait mod.

I am guessing as obsessive (in a good way) as Steve is, we'll see an actual Jäger formation? I'd expect in the new FI module as the 114th was in Italy. Not to mention, if they ever make partisans for RT, gonna need some hunters to take them down.

BTW Any idea what a Lei Division is? Google translate is screwing me on that one!

Thanks, man!

 

Mord.

 

I put the above together for Steve for CMFI (the dates and small arms allocations noted are particular to that theater), but it looks like Jäger TO&E will be deferred to RT module (there were more Jäger divisions in the East).

2 hours ago, Rinaldi said:

 

@akd I'm really surprised to see a Jaeger TO&E as late as Feburary 44. I thought that all infantry divisions had the honorific Grenadier (or Volksgrenadier later on) save for "specialist" divisions. It's so rare to hear mention of them in histories after Stalingrad.

Jäger divisions were present in Italy and on the East Front right through the end.  Note that, IIRC, there were some Jäger battalions / regiments in some Infantry divisions, but I believe these were honorific titles related to unit lineage.  Not sure if these switched to Grenadier later on.

Jäger divisions, however, did have a specialist function, essentially the same as the Gebirgs Division, but without specific training or equipment for mountaineering.  Like the Gebirgs, their support elements (especially artillery) were lighter than a standard Infantry division, making them more suited for operations in rough or less accessible terrain.  They also shared the green waffenfarbe with Gebirgs units.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure about the MP40 allocation? I am asking because German kstns usually only mention "Maschinenpistole" and starting in 1944 that usually means MP43s, especially when used en masse by infantry. Only in the later toe's did they rename this to "Sturmgewehr". If you look at these pictures from February 1944, showing members of a Skijäger unit (which might have used that same light infantry toe), you will notice that they use MP43s in considerable numbers:

W27Vp68.jpg

8d5376867b4c2aabd10b7643e0b43401--ww-his

3197161612a2e2eb43ba95d7c7aeaf82.jpg

I have never heard of a single case where the Germans wanted to issue massed 9mm smgs, it was always about the new assault rifle concept. MP40 production certainly never increased to accommodate this, in fact, they got replaced in production by the MP43 and later in the war the Germans bought additional Beretta smgs instead of making more MP40s. This is also a problem I have with the Gebirgsjäger TOE in Final Blitzkrieg: In my opinion the amount of MP40s is unrealistic, these were meant to be StG44s at this point. Now, would they have enough StGs? Probably not, but they certainly wouldn't have enough MP40s to make good the shortfall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Skijager

2 hours ago, Ts4EVER said:

Are you sure about the MP40 allocation? I am asking because German kstns usually only mention "Maschinenpistole" and starting in 1944 that usually means MP43s, especially when used en masse by infantry. Only in the later toe's did they rename this to "Sturmgewehr". If you look at these pictures from February 1944, showing members of a Skijäger unit (which might have used that same light infantry toe), you will notice that they use MP43s in considerable numbers:

W27Vp68.jpg

8d5376867b4c2aabd10b7643e0b43401--ww-his

3197161612a2e2eb43ba95d7c7aeaf82.jpg

I have never heard of a single case where the Germans wanted to issue massed 9mm smgs, it was always about the new assault rifle concept. MP40 production certainly never increased to accommodate this, in fact, they got replaced in production by the MP43 and later in the war the Germans bought additional Beretta smgs instead of making more MP40s. This is also a problem I have with the Gebirgsjäger TOE in Final Blitzkrieg: In my opinion the amount of MP40s is unrealistic, these were meant to be StG44s at this point. Now, would they have enough StGs? Probably not, but they certainly wouldn't have enough MP40s to make good the shortfall.

I'm sure that's what it was on paper for both the Jäger and Gebirgsjäger companies, and there is no evidence these units receiving large numbers of MP44 / StG44 (compared to Volksgrenadier Divisions).  That said, you are correct that they didn't have MPi in sufficient numbers to meet establishment either.  That's why I suggested for the CMFI TO&E that wherever an MPi is called for in the squad aside from the squad leaders that there be a chance of a rifle instead.  However, the Skijäger Brigade / Division on the Eastern Front (pictured above) definitely received a high allocation of MP43/44s as early as February 1944, which was later codified in its own unique KStN with Sturm Zugs in January 1945.  Here is an old post by Fernando:

Quote

 

Regarding the MP44, according to the reports, on 1 February 1944, almost 10,000 MP43 had been delivered to the units in the East Front for testing purposes.

HGr. Mitte had got 3,732 MP43 (no MP44) by that date.

HGr Mitte:
HGr Units - 718

2.Armee:
SkiJägBrig 1 - 1480
KAbt E - 147

4. Armee:
31. InfDiv - 133
78 SturmDiv - 115
95. InfDiv - 35
267. InfDiv - 35
337. InfDiv - 114
25. PzGrDiv - 115

9. Armee
AOK 9 Units - 260
6.InfDiv - 20
36. InfDiv - 88
45.InfDiv - 20
296. InfDiv - 60

3. PzArmee
PzAOK 3 Units - 2
12. InfDiv - 20
14. InfDiv - 50
197. InfDiv - 10
211. InfDiv - 35
299. InfDiv - 49
5. JägDiv - 153
4. LwFeldDiv - 39
6. LwFeldDiv – 24

 

 

This explains the photos quite well.

Anyways, I have actual returns for all Jäger, Gebirgs and Skijäger divisions January - March 1945.  No division has as many MP44s as the 1. Skijäger Division, which with 1,553 approaches the allocations made to some Volksgrenadier divisions.  The next largest allocation is around 700 for 8. Jäger Division (and oddly enough this one had zero MPi), followed by two Jäger divisions with around 450 MP44s (but a similar number of MPi also).  The rest have less than 300 MP44s and held more MPi than MP44s, some with around 1000 MPi (usually combination of MP38/40 and captured MPi).  The divisions in Italy had either zero (or in one case only a handful of) MP44s, yet some had allocations of MP40 / Italian SMG approaching 900-1000 (but still significantly below their authorized establishment).

For CMFB, if you select Excellent equipment quality before purchased the Gebirgsjäger battalion you will get a very high allocation of MP44s.   That said, while there is some evidence that the independent Gebirgsjäger battalions that fought on the West Front in late 44 had high allocations of MP44s., the 2. Gebirgs Division had no MP44s at all and about 650 MP38/40 in January 1945.  Maybe a future patch can get more rifles in the mix.

Edited by akd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that is what I meant. They were "supposed" to be MP44s, but as I said in my first post:

2 hours ago, Ts4EVER said:

Now, would they have enough StGs? Probably not, but they certainly wouldn't have enough MP40s to make good the shortfall.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In earlier Kstns, MP43s were also just called MPs. In fact, before they were renamed to "Sturmzug", the units to be equipped completely with MP43s were called "MP-Zug" for a while. This is also why in many older wargames "Volksgrenadiers" were modelled with high numbers of MP40 instead of Stgs. The Germans never planned to issue 9mm SMGs en masse, however, they always planned to replace SMGs and Rifles with MP43s. The light infantry kstns were the first to receive this new organization. I doubt they actually managed to implement this, but I am reasonably sure that they always meant MP43s in those kstns, along with some others from late 1943, early 1944 (cavalry and begleit infantry for instance).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Rinaldi said:

I'm really surprised to see a Jaeger TO&E as late as Feburary 44. I thought that all infantry divisions had the honorific Grenadier (or Volksgrenadier later on) save for "specialist" divisions. It's so rare to hear mention of them in histories after Stalingrad.

"The division was transferred to Italy in January 1944, to reinforce the Anzio front. It was destroyed in combat in that theater in April 1945."-from the Wikipedia entry for the 114th Jäger divisions. For what that's worth.

 

5 hours ago, akd said:

They also shared the green waffenfarbe with Gebirgs units.

This?

5a299f8e0919a_JgerSleevePatch114th.jpg.bd12380b87b12d284ce5343b30d20e78.jpg

 

Mord.

Edited by Mord

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No waffenfarbe are the white braids on the collars with the colorings, Mord. These are Bundeswehr waffenfarbe but it'll suffice for an example:

 

185537d1299710101-bundeswehr-ranks-germa

 

Think of them as being analogous to the crossed sabers, rifles or cannons, etc. of the US branches. The piping color of shoulder-boards also helped identify their branch of service. 

Edited by Rinaldi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gotchya! Thanks.

I was surprised when I came across that patch, in six years of researching the various German divisional symbols it's the first patch I have run into. I am guessing it is worn on the Jäger uniform sleeve, if even it's worn at all?

 

Mord.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Ts4EVER said:

In earlier Kstns, MP43s were also just called MPs. In fact, before they were renamed to "Sturmzug", the units to be equipped completely with MP43s were called "MP-Zug" for a while. This is also why in many older wargames "Volksgrenadiers" were modelled with high numbers of MP40 instead of Stgs. The Germans never planned to issue 9mm SMGs en masse, however, they always planned to replace SMGs and Rifles with MP43s. The light infantry kstns were the first to receive this new organization. I doubt they actually managed to implement this, but I am reasonably sure that they always meant MP43s in those kstns, along with some others from late 1943, early 1944 (cavalry and begleit infantry for instance).

Nope, there is no evidence of this.  The MP43/MP44 wasn't issued by paper TO&E before late summer 1944, but rather by orders for specific units. Specific infantry divisions were issued MP43/MP44 in large numbers even though they were still on "standard" infantry division TO&E.  These did not replace MP40s in the TO&E, and in fact explicit orders were issued not to use MP43 / MP44 that way.   In the case of the Gebirgs and Jäger divisions, it clear they were over optimistic about issueing MPi to these units in late '43 / early '44.  Their TO&E was never updated to reflect organization specifically for MP44 / StG44 (MP-Zug or Sturm-Zug), and later (1945) returns make it clear that they had huge shortfalls of MPi (not Sturmgewehrs).

Even before the official switch to "Sturmgewehr," it is fairly clear in most TO&E whether or not a unit was intended to receive MP44s.  This can be seen in paper TO&E for Sperr divisions, Panzer Brigades and early Volksgrenadier divisions which include explicit notes on "MP. Zug" with no LMGs (which was the rationale behind MP44 issuance) and sometimes explicits notes that MP44 was to be used. Also, in many cases there are associated orders that make it clear the MPs in certain platoons in the brigade divisions were MP44s (e.g. orders issued by Guderian in connection with the formation of Panzer Brigades).

Here is a very clear example of a Kriegsgliederung showing both that they were still on the 1.3.44 TO&E, that this results in a massive shortfall of MP38/40 and that there were not MP / Sturm Zugs in the companies:

5Gebirgs_1_3_1945.thumb.jpg.eeb862525f6090020e3234db9ef83bec.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×