Jump to content

problematic PIATs


Recommended Posts

I just witnessed a recent turn where four PIATs loosed a total of eleven rounds at a motionless target 35 meters or less away, without a single hit. Every one missed.

They were regular quality, they were not under fire (the target was turning and I suspect shocked), and they were all in command. The enemy unit was not hull down, either.

Now, I know one incident does not necessarily suggest a problem, but this seems odd to me. Anyone else have similar experiences?

Or is the PIAT notoriously inaccurate?

edit: it was daytime, & clear.

[ April 26, 2004, 05:17 AM: Message edited by: Konstantine ]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

what experience level were those piats? how far away were from the target? was it day or night? what were the weather conditions? also did u know that unlike the bazooka or panzerfaust which are propelled by a rocket the piat is propelled by a spring. i'm not sure but i don't think that would be very accurate in real life.

i did a test with a piat shooting at stug from

50m- 1 shot hit, 2 shot miss, 3 & 4 hit

75m- 1 & 2 missed , 3,4 & 5 hit , and rest missed

100m- 5 & 7 hit rest missed

125- 5 hit rest missed

150m and > - all missed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wondered about a backblast being produced by the PIAT, as I also thought it was launched by a spring. I don't have the book handy, but an Allied officer in BF's new book The CMAK Companion mentions how hazardous it was to launch a PIAT in a building, due to the backblast. I know this is a subjective question, but any insight would be appreciated - just how much of a backblast did the PIAT produce? As compared to, say, a Panzerfaust?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but an Allied officer in BF's new book The CMAK Companion mentions how hazardous it was to launch a PIAT in a building, due to the backblast.
:confused: :confused: :confused:

Are you sure he was talking about the PIAT? One of the advantages was that it could be fired from confined spaces because it didn't have a backblast.

In fact it would be impossible for it to have a backblast as the rear was enclosed. It did, however, have quite a fearsome recoil. In fact the recoil was supposed to recock the firing spring, unfortunately if the firer didn't brace himself properly this didn't happen and a very awkward manual recock was required.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is off the excellent Panzerfaust site of M.Hofbauer:

The weapon fired a fin-stabilized shaped-charge projectile with a length of 38cm, a caliber of 8.9cm and weight of 1.13kg. HE-Shrapnel and smoke warheads were also available. The projectile can not be inserted into the forward part of the weapon before the spring has been loaded. The latter is a very tedious process: not only does the very strong spring need a loading force of 90kg, but also has to be loaded with a certain techinque. Therefore, the weapon can only be loaded by very strong and trained personnel. Loading in a prone position is out of question: With the tube between the legs and standing on the T-piece with the feet, the gunner grabs the tube at the trigger pistol grip and turns it counterclockwise while while at the same time pulling it up until he hears the cocked spring lock with a loud click.

Firing the weapon is no less of a problem: the trigger can only be pulled using all four fingers. Then the firing pin hits the procectile in its rear, where a small charge of propellant is detonated. The latter makes for a recoil that will cock the spring automatically for the next shot - if the gunner can't take that recoil - which was reportedly not too seldom - he will have to load the weapon again in the way described above. The projectile leaves the weapon at a Vo of 135m/s but accelerates in flight. Tanks could be attacked at ranges up to 100yd., larger targets like houses at larger distances of 300m and more.

From what I understand there was no backblast when using PIAT. It wasn't a rocket launcher, the rear end of the weapon was pressed against shoulder.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The spring loaded pin will detonate the propellent and when the bomb 'uncovers' from the pin, there will be an excaping blast. Its like an inside out gun. The bomb carries the 'barrel' away with it.

There most certainly is a blast and it is directed not backwards out the tail like a panzerfaust or bazooka, but rather towards the firers face.

I imagine it would be like someone firing a large blank cartidge right at your face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sergei

Terry Ganders book on anti-tank weapons disagrees in some respects to your quoted source.

Two fingers to fire [ Iam not sure that thisn't the traditional English way]

Can be re-cocked lying down - but very difficult

Mentions the max. possible range as 700 metres but effective ranges as per your quote.

Regarding Mr Tittles and blowback I think the whole point of the blast to the rear was dissapated in successfully pushing the spring back for recocking. It would rather mess up the design otherwise? : )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll need to re-read that chapter of the book, as I'm not positive the officer said "PIAT." I was half asleep when I read that section redface.gif but I do recall thinking "Huh, I didn't know that about the PIAT ..." and was going to post a query about that on here. I don't know how accurate the movie is, but in A Bridge Too Far, they show Colonel Frost's men firing a PIAT from the balcony of a house overlooking the Arnhem bridge. There wasn't much of a blast when the projectile left the launcher, which seemed to "jive" with what I'd read of the PIAT's characteristics. (By the way, there's footage in The Pianist of a partisan in Warsaw firing a Panzerfaust from the balcony of a building, the target being the police headquarters across the street. Couldn't really see the backblast from the camera's angle, but the resulting explosion was impressive.) Unless someone else beats me to it, I'll post the relevant section from BF's book later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Piat was a shoulder fired weapon much like a rifle, and it wasn't unknown for the firer to get something dislocated in the process (sounds rather worse than the anti-tank rifles the Piat replaced, actually!). You'll notice the Piat in the game rests against the little guy's shoulder, not over the shoulder in bazoka-style.

Four Piats firing together could very well miss eleven times (that's only three attempts each and one guy's missed shot wouldn't increase the likelhood of the second guy hitting anything). A single Piat team firing eleven shots in a row and missing WOULD be odd!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rod comes forward under spring pressure. It enters the bombs rear and slides into it till it strikes the charge. The charge detonates creating pressure and starts both the bombs sliding off the rod (shooting downrange) and pushing the rod backwards. When the bomb seperates from the rod, there will be an escape of gas, smoke , etc. This will more than likely shoot backwards in a cone pattern. Very similar to the effects of a low velocity gun firing.

I would imagine that the place where seperation takes place is somewhere along the trough. Is the large tube area meant to capture this blast? It would certainly get the spring dirty if it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Sergei:

...not only does the very strong spring need a loading force of 90kg...

Ninety kg? That's almost 200 lbs. Even an average strong man could injure himself trying to lift that kind of weight. And the method you describe of cocking the spring is equivalent to lifting a weight.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr Tittles

The trough in which the round lies takes up only 25 % of the length of the weapon. The rest of the tube therefore provides the area for the spring to be compressed into . Recocking achieved or not the gas would then be vented from the upward facing large trough in the front of the Piat.

Weighing 14.4kg 32lb there was a very large monpod on the front end to carry the weight when aiming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Michael Emrys:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Sergei:

...not only does the very strong spring need a loading force of 90kg...

Ninety kg? That's almost 200 lbs. Even an average strong man could injure himself trying to lift that kind of weight. And the method you describe of cocking the spring is equivalent to lifting a weight.

Michael </font>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by dieseltaylor:

Mr Tittles

The trough in which the round lies takes up only 25 % of the length of the weapon. The rest of the tube therefore provides the area for the spring to be compressed into . Recocking achieved or not the gas would then be vented from the upward facing large trough in the front of the Piat.

This would certainly be very discomforting and I can only imagine the flinch-factor that had to be dealt with.

It is not the same as firing a typical rifle where the powder, blast is propelled forward. When the rod/bomb disengage after the blast, the effect is shot back at the firer.

A better design would have had the bomb attached by some break away holding device. The bomb could be held in place on the end without a trough. There would be a large funnel around the end of the weapon to protect the firer.

[ April 27, 2004, 07:59 AM: Message edited by: Mr. Tittles ]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by MikeyD:

The Piat was a shoulder fired weapon much like a rifle, and it wasn't unknown for the firer to get something dislocated in the process (sounds rather worse than the anti-tank rifles the Piat replaced, actually!). You'll notice the Piat in the game rests against the little guy's shoulder, not over the shoulder in bazoka-style.

Four Piats firing together could very well miss eleven times (that's only three attempts each and one guy's missed shot wouldn't increase the likelhood of the second guy hitting anything). A single Piat team firing eleven shots in a row and missing WOULD be odd!

Thanks for your interest folks. I think this response in particular neatly solves my "problem". Obviously I need to watch "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead" again! ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...