Jump to content

My new favourite toy...


Recommended Posts

I just played a little defense QB against the AI. AI purchased forces, AI force+100%, AI level+1.

I got a weak (2 Plts)company of Panzergrenadiers, a marder, a 20mm HT, a Flak truck and a 81mm FO.

Ah, forgot the most important:

a regular 105mm gun.

This puny force was pitted against a soviet infantry battallion with light armour support.

I guess the gun crew deserves an extra Schnapps this evening... :D

105mm2.jpg

Being in command of a moral+2/combat+2 HQ might have helped a bit, too... :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hehe...german CDV version: the only way to go! :D

Finally I don't have to picture porn stars doing weird stuff anytime I see a "rear penetration"!

"Durchschlag", yeah, that's how we want it!

And BulletRat: I looked for that thread but I quit after looking for it and got lost after page 3...

[ December 20, 2002, 10:01 PM: Message edited by: ParaBellum ]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

ok... say it's 1941... both the 150mm ig and the 105 art have HE only (not counting smoke)...

i've noticed that, when targeting t34s, the 105mm gives a greater chance of kill, and in practice also seems to kill better.... my theory is that... even though the 105 and the 105 are both firing HE, the 105mm's longer barrel gives it some kind of 'punch' which, against armor is greater than the loss in blast value relative to the 150...

i'd first thought that the 105 would be less effective against the likes of t34s, but in practice in the game i find that the 105mm is more effective.... first of all it gets the '1st hit' sooner, and secondly it seems to kill more quickly...

so even though the 150 is better against softer targets and lighter vehicles... the 105 seems to be better against t34s and such...

another thing i was wondering... how come no kind of "AP" for the 105mm in 1941? didn't they have some kind of 'concrete piercing bunker busting' ammo in 'real life?' i mean.. not that i'm complaining about their HE-only performance against tanks (which is quite good) or anything...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by manchildstein II:

another thing i was wondering... how come no kind of "AP" for the 105mm in 1941? didn't they have some kind of 'concrete piercing bunker busting' ammo in 'real life?' i mean.. not that i'm complaining about their HE-only performance against tanks (which is quite good) or anything...

To my knowledge, the 105mm FH was designed for indirect fire missions, it was used against tanks with direct fire as an ad hoc measure.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...