Jump to content
Special Upgrade 4 Tech Tips

Sequoia

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,610

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Sequoia

  1. Sequoia
    I'm confused (as usual). Is the Panzerfaust 3 graphic in the screenshot a placeholder?
  2. Sequoia
    Any change to how balconies are handled? I.e. will troops on a floor with balconies facing the wall with the balcony run out onto it? I don't have Black Sea and don't know if it has balconies, and if so if it's been tweaked there. Thanks
  3. Sequoia
    The Bölkow Bo 105 is mentioned as part of the German air support on the NATO module web page to this day, but was cut from the final product apparently. I always wondered why. It always felt a little odd for the Germans to rely on the Dutch for helicopter support to me.
  4. Sequoia
    I think there could be a market for North Africa. What I'm saying is doing it as you suggest with no revenue in return strikes me as a non-starter.
  5. Sequoia
    Erwin, I would think possible, but I also cannot think of how that would make sense for them to take the time to do that over other priorities, as the number of possible folks using those mods would be quite a low percentage.
  6. Sequoia
    US halftracks would be appropriate. IIRC for all you old Panzerblitz players, they were not widely used for infantry transport in Mech brigades as portrayed in that game, but rather for use in Recon battalions. I'm sure someone will set me straight if that's not right.
  7. Sequoia
    Which wouldn't surprise me, and I'm fine with that. I thought it wouldn't hurt to ask though. Not that I want to take up much of Steve's time.
  8. Sequoia
    Just a hypothetical question. I don't know if I'll get an answer. Is there a practical limit to the number of modules a base game could have? I was just curious if, for example, it could make sense to expand CMFI and CMRT to earlier periods with modules rather than go with new base games? It would result in fewer Families needing support through patches and upgrades but there may be programmatic downsides as well. Maybe Steve is too busy to answer which could be a good thing as it means CMSF 2 sooner.
  9. Sequoia
    It is THE board wargaming event of the year for North America (sorry WBC). I don't know if computer wargaming is represented but I'm sure there is plenty of cross-over between the players of the 2 genres (as there is for me). But no I am not attending as it's just not in the budget right now.
  10. Sequoia
    No interest in playing with Chieftains and Scorpions Lord Protector?
  11. Sequoia
    Is that because AT guns are spotted too easy or because pretty much all the CMAK scenarios take place on maps with relatively short distances or something else you think?
  12. Sequoia
    Didn't Steve once say they don't actually hold the rights to CM:Afghanistan?
  13. Sequoia
    Pretty sure that's not the case. It would be Kursk to Bagration.
  14. Sequoia
    Which is why, if we ever did get early war, I wouldn't want to see a Sealion module.
  15. Sequoia
    Why's that? The North African campaign has the reputation of being one with few war crimes, especially when compared to the Ostfront.
  16. Sequoia
    Which IIRC is when you had both the earlier Abrams and Bradley's but still some M60A3s and M113s right?
  17. Sequoia
    Fulda Gap fans, what year would you suggest? The Cold War lasted a long time as I'm sure you know.
  18. Sequoia
    Double crap. This is turning out really weird. I meant the post between MikeyD and Dynaman. And I haven't even had any alcohol. Anyway the post below
  19. Sequoia
    Crap sorry, 847 isn't the post number that's you up votes. Anyway the post between Mikey Dynaman. It will all make sense.
  20. Sequoia
    I posted this request deep in another thread but thought I'd give it more prominence. If at all possible please move the location of IED's from where they were in the scenarios in the original game. I still remember where some of them are. You wouldn't want to give me an unfair advantage. Thanks
  21. Sequoia
    sb check your spelling in post 847.
  22. Sequoia
    Mike, yeah I personally wouldn't have a problem if water wasn't added to the beach landing scenario, but others might. I'm mainly picking folks brains to see if other elements that weren't available in the Engine some 9 years ago could now be tweaked for realism, and also confirming the way the landing is represented is believable. It seems to be the case that it is. IIRC you made another beach landing scenario (Shores of Tripoli) that I enjoyed a lot. If I had one request for that, it would be to rearrange the IEDs as I still remember where some are.
  23. Sequoia
    Care to elaborate?
  24. Sequoia
    Capt & MoW thanks. One more question. The Marine campaign starts with a scouting force on the "beach" at 2:00 in the morning. I assume they have arrive by some sort of smallcraft. Is that SOP? One other thing. In the original game, the Campaign briefing says the landing is supported by elements of the 5th Fleet. Shouldn't that be 6th Fleet in the Med?
  25. Sequoia
    @ Manowar & Captain Miller do LHAs/LHDs have Cobra Gunships for landing support?
×
×
  • Create New...