Mace

I've read about the Challenger kill at 5km as well. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Challenger 1 & 2: Spearhead of the British Royal Armored Corps (publisher concord) It was reported that a Challenger knocked out an Iraqi tank with it's first round at a distance of over 5,100 meters. (5,574)<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> I think there's is another reference to this in the book authored by the then Divisional Commander of the 1st Armoured Division (UK). I'll dig it up and post it if I can. Mace [ 09-29-2001: Message edited by: Mace ]

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Slapdragon: You know, I get back from two evenings on the street in a patrol car<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Hey, I think I saw you on Cops once. Weren't you the one being manhandled into the back of the police car while handcuffed? Mace

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by New Age Santa: Just illustrating the limits of the 88 in the CM engine, and perhaps showing those who were wondering about the accuracy of the 88 in CM some clear cut stastistics. Also, to show if what CM represents is really how accurate the 88 is. 40+ shells to kill one target from extreme range seems a bit much, especially with a elite crew.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> IMHO, it seems correct to me. Gunnery optics during WW2 were relatively new and although their were some aids to assist the gunner, attempting to hit a medium sized tank at extreme range would be extremely difficult, even for an Elite crew. Secondly, the optics were optimised for engagement at normal engagement ranges, not extreme. Thirdly, there are other factors that affect the projectile path, eg wind bursts. Modern technology accounts for these nuances (eg ballistic computers, laser designation, gun stabilisation), unfortunately the WW2 gunner had none of these. Mace [ 09-28-2001: Message edited by: Mace ]

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Berlichtingen: There is always a reason for drinking. Just off the top of my head, I'd say reading your posts ranks as a reason for drinking<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> I'll drink to that (then again, I'll drink to anything) Mace

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by russellmz: ...this story so disturbed john q. public, that all...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> ...psychiatrists upped their fees substantially in eager anticipation of...

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Captain Wacky: Ahahahaha, don't be silly boys, women don't play wargames <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Play 'em they do, and quite well! Mace

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Speedy: Attention all my opponenets! I am heading off to Melbourne <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> In that case, I'll be avoiding Melbourne over the weekend. Mace

Spoke to her last night. She's fine (and whooping my a*se on a CMBO operation). Mace

Woot! Put the billy on, break up the damper and pass it around...the pool's back in god's own country. Where the men are men, and the sheep and women appreciate it. Thankyou, Speedy Err..btw don't for once imagine I hate and despise you any less. Mace

Sorry to rain on your parade, Menschy baby, but due to the duel electrical drive system, the Ferdinand/Elefant was very underpowered and prone to break down. I'd rather have a Jagdpanther any day! Mace

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Andrew Hedges: The only fair thing to do is to fill orders in alphabetical order by username<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Not that I'm being biased or anything, but it should be done by age, or any other method that results in my being able to post an order well before the majority! Mace

It'll just add that other factor to consider when arranging a quick battle with another player: "Which front would you like to play on?" Mace

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Hiram's Ghost: ...nearest Comic book convention. I was dressed as my favorite hero with my cape and...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> ...my purple underwear worn with pride on the outside of my pink stockings. Over my head I wore my chartruese bra of bravado, and tucked in my fawn boots was my...

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by dalem: Speaking of enema hoses, I have resolved to beat any future squires of mine with only the unused ones. He or she, however, will have to fashion a costume for himself out of used ones.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Consideration for others, kindness, wisdom and friendliness. These are some of the words that come to my mind reading Dalem's post. Dalem, spare the rod, spoil the squire, that's what I always say. Interesting to also see that Slapdragon is testing the waters of the MBT by making numerous posts. Sorry but we dont have a frequent post scheme here, so you may be wasting your time (but then again....). Mace

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Lawyer: so put it where the sun don't shine. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> I'd love to travel to England, but I can't afford the ticket atm. Mace

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Lawyer: I like the cut of your jib, Speedy. Just show up at Grevey's on Friday, Mate. You can bring Stuka, but please leave Mace at home.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> I am not prepared to sell my soul or tell untruths for a free beer, unlike one of my fellow countrymen - Speedy, stop pawing at his feet, it's embarrassing - and since I have enough beer in the fridge I can honestly say "you suck"! Mace

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Gunny_ Bunny: Instead of four programmers devoting all their time to the basic game features, MS could really overhaul this game: <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> The 4 BTS gentlemen are committed to producing quality product, and generally listening to any intelligent comments made by their customers. That's fine by me. Mace

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by hansfritz: Is this biased by the American programmers,do they refuse to see the Sherman,like most allied tanks were ****.Over to you.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Over to me? There's no bias here IMHO. The Rate of Fire is a function of the calibre of the weapon (those uber 88cm shells are a real pain to load) plus the quality of the crew. Crap Crews means a slower reload time. As for the kills, sh*t happens. I've played numerous tactical wargames where a Sherman takes out a Jagpanther, King Tiger, etc with a lucky shot. The germans weren't laggerts in tank design, but the allies weren't lacking in shell technology either. Don't believe me? I would suggest reading some WW2 books on tactical tank combat then. Mace

I'm probably wishing my life away here, but bring on next week! Mace

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Scipio: I've seen this in the units list of Steel Panthers. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Kitty's King Tiger was based on 233. You can pick it up at her site. And Kitty's fine btw. Mace

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Seanachai: Am I to understand that Roborat and that other poxy villain, Capt. Foobar, aren't yet made Knights?! Jesus to jesus and eight hands round, lads, Francisco Franco's career covered a shorter span than these Squireships!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> ...and ameobic entities (eg SSNs) have lived long and full lives during that period!

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Fenno: I'll sink deeply in myself and ponder about the irreverable trauma caused by my Swedish teacher who used knee-high brown stockings through the year. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Well, if your school teacher happened to be a 20-something female with nice attributes, the only trauma would be discomfort caused by a case of ever-tightening trousers. However, if the teacher was male, all I can say is 'this is our choice of uniform in the MBT'! So if you fear for your sanity, exit, and return to your smoked eels. Mace

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by mensch: BTS, kudos to you all on the great work! I won't do it, but here is Mace to give you a big fat harry kiss<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Who's Harry? But yes, I'll go up to Queensland and give Kwazydog a big juicy one (perhaps a stubby of Vic Bitter) in appreciation of his fine work. Mace

Hey, can I help it if I'm a perfectionist?! Mace

In that case, what do you hope for? Mace [ 09-20-2001: Message edited by: Mace ]