Becket Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 One would think that Snarker would be in a better mood as he just demolished a double digit figure of my Soviet tanks. :mad: :mad: :mad: So much for playing with standard Soviet tactics....err, wait a minute, I think this is the same thing that happened to the Soviets at Prokhorovka. Let's ruminate on "Snarker" for a moment. A "runner" runs. A "thrower" throws. A "pitcher" pitches. A "linebacker" backs a line. A "receiver" receives. As you see, the suffix "-er" indicates a person who performs the action in the body of the word. Thus, we assume that Snarker snarks. I hesitate to inquire further. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Axe_ Posted September 10, 2003 Author Share Posted September 10, 2003 snark (snahrk) n. an imaginary animal of ill-defined characteristics and potential. -From Lewis Carroll's poem "The Hunting of the Snark" (1876). v. to quickly suck or snort something into the nose or mouth, especially a food or drink. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Becket Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 This is why I hesitate to inquire further. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Axe_ Posted September 10, 2003 Author Share Posted September 10, 2003 Originally posted by Axe2121: snark (snahrk) v. to quickly suck or snort something into the nose or mouth, especially a food or drink. Sounds more appropriate for McNugget_the_wino, doesn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_the_wino Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 Originally posted by Axe2121: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Axe2121: snark (snahrk) v. to quickly suck or snort something into the nose or mouth, especially a food or drink. Sounds more appropriate for McNugget_the_wino, doesn't it? </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Axe_ Posted September 10, 2003 Author Share Posted September 10, 2003 And a good morning to you too. Don't you have some stomping to take care of? Where the hell has the chief loon of this bin been lately? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_the_wino Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 Originally posted by Axe2121: Where the hell has the chief loon of this bin been lately? tee-hee....*snicker*......BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA And by the by, my only "stomping" is in my PBEMs, either stomping or being stomped. Thanky very much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keke Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 Originally posted by Axe2121: Where the hell has the chief loon of this bin been lately? Chief Loon: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Axe_ Posted September 10, 2003 Author Share Posted September 10, 2003 You don't think he's still looking for the new thread, do you? I mean we're on page three fer crissakes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_the_wino Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 Originally posted by Axe2121: Hey Mike. Well put in the GF on Hitler's film-making beeatch. If you haven't seen "Triumph of Will" (or sumfink like dat), you should. I saw in college in a History of European Intellectuals, 1920-70. I was shocked that anyone would say "it is just a documentary" and not immediately bust out into laughter. It was definitely propoganda of the worst kind. Michael Moore's "Bowling for Columbine" is a documentary, didn't agree with all of it but I thought it did a good job presenting facts and opinions on gun control. Personally, I didn't see it as strong anti-gun piece but more of an exploration of the subject. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Axe_ Posted September 10, 2003 Author Share Posted September 10, 2003 Originally posted by mike_the_wino: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Axe2121: Hey Mike. Well put in the GF on Hitler's film-making beeatch. If you haven't seen "Triumph of Will" (or sumfink like dat), you should. I saw in college in a History of European Intellectuals, 1920-70. I was shocked that anyone would say "it is just a documentary" and not immediately bust out into laughter. It was definitely propoganda of the worst kind. Michael Moore's "Bowling for Columbine" is a documentary, didn't agree with all of it but I thought it did a good job presenting facts and opinions on gun control. Personally, I didn't see it as strong anti-gun piece but more of an exploration of the subject. </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86smopuim Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 Originally posted by Snarker: a PBEM game requires - and this might come as a shock... wait for it, maggots... an email address! Unless of course it's a game played between two psychics; in which case the outcome is already known so why bother? :mad: :mad: :mad: GRGRGGGRRRRRRAAARRR :mad: :mad: :mad: This is the last time Maggots! smope _at_ ponyshow.com And u bizwiches have to get atleast a major, since I am so :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snarker Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 Originally posted by Becket: One would think that Snarker would be in a better mood as he just demolished a double digit figure of my Soviet tanks. :mad: :mad: :mad: So much for playing with standard Soviet tactics....err, wait a minute, I think this is the same thing that happened to the Soviets at Prokhorovka. Let's ruminate on "Snarker" for a moment. A "runner" runs. A "thrower" throws. A "pitcher" pitches. A "linebacker" backs a line. A "receiver" receives. As you see, the suffix "-er" indicates a person who performs the action in the body of the word. Thus, we assume that Snarker snarks. I hesitate to inquire further. It's not related to the 'official' definition at all. It's what my friends called me for my favorite tactic in "Half-Life". I'd find a weapon called a "Snark", and drop it from high points. Oddly enough, a Snark fits well in this lunatic asylum we called the Waffle. It's basically a large maggot filled with TNT that attacks mercilessly and then explodes. What's a Becket? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Axe_ Posted September 10, 2003 Author Share Posted September 10, 2003 Originally posted by Snarker: It's what my friends called me for my favorite tactic in "Half-Life". I'd find a weapon called a "Snark", and drop it from high points. Your gameyness knows no bounds, does it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snarker Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 Originally posted by 86smopuim: And u bizwiches have to get atleast a major, since I am so :cool: What? :cool: ? What is that? A blind, grinning, annetto food colored cheese-eating surrender monkey? Silly Smope-on-a-Rope(or SOAR for short), why don't you type 'smope _at_ ponyshow.com' or 'smope@REMOVEponyshowME.com' or something similar in your profile since that's persistent? No self-loathing maggot would take the time to search through all this 'splodie anger hoping to find your addy. Let alone know how to search for it... Now, what was I on about again? Oh, yeah. I forget. :mad: :mad: [ September 10, 2003, 03:39 PM: Message edited by: Snarker ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_the_wino Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 Originally posted by Snarker: What's a Becket? Don't ask, don't tell. 'Nuff said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snarker Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 Originally posted by Axe2121: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Snarker: It's what my friends called me for my favorite tactic in "Half-Life". I'd find a weapon called a "Snark", and drop it from high points. Your gameyness knows no bounds, does it? </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86smopuim Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 Originally posted by Snarker: why don't you type 'smope _at_ ponyshow.com' or 'smope@REMOVEponyshowME.com' or something similar in your profile since that's persistent? Cuz I can't edit my profile unless I bump my sig down to 250 Chars or less, which would put me in the same 3rd class boat with the rest of you, hole in the bottom and all. :mad: :mad: :mad: Edited becuase I felt like it [ September 10, 2003, 03:57 PM: Message edited by: 86smopuim ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_the_wino Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 Ok, lads I am up against it on this sig thing. I need some input. Choose from the 2 below: 1) "I am mike_the_wino's love monkey" or 2) "My loss to mtw was more satisfying than fellating a goat. That reminds me, I need to brush my teeth for dinner." #2 is more humilating, therefore much better but may be too long. It could be shorten to just one sentence but then it loses something. Axe break out the editorial hat and give me some help here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave H Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 Originally posted by mike_the_wino: Ok, lads I am up against it on this sig thing. I need some input. Wino, or Nugget, or Nug, or is it Keanu, which unfortunate gets to display this sig line? Or is it a sig line you plan to lock away and save to pull out in the unlikely event you win a game sometime? Did anybody else think the title of the new Peng thread was about the light inside a refrigerator? :confused: :confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_the_wino Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 Originally posted by Dave H: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by mike_the_wino: Ok, lads I am up against it on this sig thing. I need some input. Wino, or Nugget, or Nug, or is it Keanu, which unfortunate gets to display this sig line? </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Axe_ Posted September 10, 2003 Author Share Posted September 10, 2003 Originally posted by Dave H: Did anybody else think the title of the new Peng thread was about the light inside a refrigerator? :confused: :confused: Grrrr!! As a Smiths fan, I'll pretend I didn't hear that. And Mike — #2 leaves nothing to the imagination. *shudder* :mad: :mad: :mad: Subtle humor is always my first choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keke Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 Here's presented nugget_the_grape_stomper's metamorphosis after a hard day's work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seanachai Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 Originally posted by Soddball: They made me! Nidan said sumfink about having a nice Volvo and I couldn't help myself! *shudder* A rather funny bit, actually. Of course, in a land of wall to wall SUV huge pieces o' ****e, it's hard to get worked up about Volvos. Still, I laughed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seanachai Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 Originally posted by Dave H: Everyone see YK2's rules for the latest version of the Peng thread? Now they are sending all the "unwelcome" visitors to what is referred to as the "Other Thread", where YK2 says we will welcome them with TNT. I think that's a wonderful idea. Nothing like free advertising courtesy of the "competition". Thank you, YK2. Competition? You handle our run off. Rather like a drainage ditch. Careful or we'll send over the Commissioner of drains. Do you really want 50 odd posts by the Justicar? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts