Johansson66 Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 How is CMFBs performance compared to the other games? Or will it run the same as like CMBS? Thanks 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TGarner Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 I think it runs better then any of the other CMs and I have them all. Seems smoother to me. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sttp Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 (edited) CMFB without a doubt seems to perform better. I admit, though, that I don't have any objective numbers to confirm that. What gives me the impression of better performance is maps like the following, which my PC is handling just fine. I think a map like this would've been a real problem in some of the prior titles. (This map is from the "Hot Time at Hatten" scenario, and note that the battlefield is not nearly as barren as this zoomed out pic makes it appear.) Edited April 7, 2016 by sttp sp 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Canadian Cat Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 That is BFC's stated goal - to make things better. I cannot say I noticed a difference, I would say it feels the same as CMBS and the other games. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew H. Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 It seems about the same as CMBS in my limited testing so far. But CMBS has always seemed to run a bit better than CMBN and CMFI for me - although this is maybe subjective. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanzfeld Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 I forget...do we use in game anti aliasing or outside game force anti aliasing? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
montanaza Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 Out of curiosity, is CM performance in general the same on Mac as Windows? I mean for all the games, not just FB. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aragorn2002 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 My impression, for what it is worth, is that it runs smoother than CMRT. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camarilabot Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 On 7.4.2016. at 4:47 PM, Johansson66 said: How is CMFBs performance compared to the other games? Or will it run the same as like CMBS? Thanks same as red thunder or cmbs. any pc that's 300 dollars will run it almost exactly the same as 900 one 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snarre Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 well to me big battles run smoother and turn loading time is shorter. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Placebo Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 faster load times my just be down to the empty z folder, once the mods start coming out I am sure my load times will increase 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snarre Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 nope i tested empty z folder whit RT and mods have only marginal time ingreasing to loading. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Canadian Cat Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 This was looked at a long time ago: Very little difference - certainly not noticeable. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.