BTR

Is this true @Haiduk?

If only.

Could be, I certainly held my trucks back until that response element arrived :P. I find this scenario among the best in CMBS, partly because engagement scale fits the map, and the overall theme fits the scale.

I've not noticed Mi-24's hitting harder for UKR side, but then I've yet to encounter anyone who uses air support over helicopter support for the Ukrainians in my PBEM's.

Against a human player, there is always that element of uncertainty that governs initial decisions. I think that is mostly what factored in the choices made.

My opponent decided to make an AAR from his side, so enjoy I think the next part will be out tomorrow.

If the next shock force is ever out:

I meant baiting as "provoking" and "taunting", also as positioning by BTR-70 as a bait for the enemy to unload their AT's at :). After a six grenades being launched at it in a single turn, it came out unscathed. This was a question of proper suppression. Not one enemy RPG team was not receiving fire at the time. My RPG gunners worked fine throughout this entire match, scoring some really good hits despite being relatively untrained. Also a pic from this scenario at the end:

Just a funny moment from one of my PBEM's. Ambush is the scenario (excellent scenario), I'm playing as Ukies, a friend is playing as Ru. All in the span of one turn:

With the war now raging on for nearly five years, there have been many storage raids by FSA. Since parts of FSA trickled down to ISIS, perhaps they took some of their acquired weapons with them.

Syria was one of the larger importers of Kornet missiles since 2009.

How's it ERA's job if the impact angle was through inert areas?

Yup, more so you don't get to see one drop armored cargo that often.

Something very cool happens at 2.20

100 T-14's have been contracted by Ru MoD. I am not sure if this contract includes the already delivered 20 army trial vehicles, but I have a strong suspicion that it does.

I for one am not so hyped for new equipment, but rather for some improvements on old TOE's, vehicle models and some select mechanics.

I can understand that. I tried keeping Ukrainian insignia to a minimum for exactly the same preferential reasons. Again, once I get more time I'll see what I can do.

That would require me to rehash every single texture on the Ukranian and Russian sides. Nothing complicated, just very monotonous work. I'll keep this in mind for when I get mode time or more demand :). Just out of curiosity, why do you not like the markings?

http://www.nooooooooooooooo.com/

So now that CMFB is released, I can't wait for CMBS patch/module :D.

Here are texture packs with re-worked MBT sights and other minor details. Some things I could not correct as they are texture bugs. https://www.dropbox.com/s/yzhnlflofedmlh8/RA-regulation%20standard%20%28markings%2901.brz?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/hopst99kaa4lid1/UA-regulation%20standard%20%28markings%2901.brz?dl=0 You will have to delete two previous markings .brz files and insert these new ones.

Little detailing takes a lot more time then I'd like. PS - Sometimes I wish I could correct the models too...

Doesn't the TOW missile rotate while in flight?