Jump to content

Seedorf81

Members
  • Posts

    940
  • Joined

Posts posted by Seedorf81

  1. Quote

    But according to family legend, Kay said to Ike "Give me one tonight". Ike said to Monty "I'm too busy to sort out the Ardennes, you'll have to do it". Monty said to Jorrocks "I'll be buggered if I'm going to send good Anglican boys down there to help out those non-conformist colonials, who have you got to spare?" Jorrocks said to Paddy "Stop the Jerries on the Meause tonight." Paddy said to John Martins, "Give me five Bedford loads of yer'se strongest Guinness, I need to set it alight and roll it down a bone dry hill in the middle of the desert, so that dumb movie goers in ten years time will think that it is how we beat the Gerry in the middle of a Belgian winter".

    Yeah, that "Battle of the Bulge" movie was the worst WW2pic I ever saw.

    Until "Fury" came out..

  2. Aragorn2002,

    I need to apologize. Reacted before I  saw who wrote the comment (your comment) about Goumier and rape.

    Thought it was an ignorant rightwing "the Germans in ww2 hardly did anthing wrong, look how bad the Allies were" view.

    I should have looked before I reacted, because I know that you are a well informed and decent chap.

     

  3. 2 hours ago, Aragorn2002 said:

    And some other, more realistic, articles. Without excuses for the mass rape of women, men, children and even animals.

    http://uncensoredhistory.blogspot.com/2013/10/mass-rape-ww2-italian-women-french-colonial-soldiers-moroccan.html

    http://uncensoredhistory.blogspot.com/2012/07/brutal-mass-rape-german-women-1945-ww2.html

    Yes, definitely looking forward to meeting those 'soldiers' in the coming module...

    Yeah, thank God the German Wehrmacht and SS soldiers never did anything wrong in WW2, because the " politically correct" wouldn't be able  to play Combat Mission at all.

  4. Hey there John,

    Very interesting info ( as always ). Thank you.

    Watching ww2 war movies getting even more difficult now, because from now on I  unvoluntarily will be looking for mistakes in how infantry carries their weapons! ( Next to my, already annoying, critical look at the correct use of vehicles, uniforms, weapons, armor, equipment etc.)

    Thanks for spoiling the fun!!😉

     

     

    Btw, do you have info on friendly fire killpercentages during ww2? I once read that it was about 16%(!) in general. That's bloody unbelievable..

     

     

  5. On 6/8/2019 at 11:13 AM, Kaunitz said:

    A Bren gun in a light machine gun role covers a 6pdr anti tank gun from enemy machine gun fire coming in from medium distance (ca. 350m). The incoming volume of fire being thus reduced, the 6pdr can resume its dirty work. BAM! 

    Unbenannt.jpg

    By the way: Does anyone know why the (empty) "Lloyd carrier" is so expensive for quickbattles? It can transport fewer men than the "Bren carrier", provides less ammo and has no MG... Why would anyone pick a Lloyd carrier over a Bren carrier? Is this an oversight? 

    Rarity, perhaps?

    Less available assets are more expensive, I think.

  6. With years of - waiting in vain- experience I used to believe that Battlefront would eventually give us the new CMFI bones "when hell freezes over", but with that climate warming- thingy even that won't do no more..

    I'm 56, and still hope the new module will arrive before I'm a pensioner. Just another 12 years...

  7. On ‎3‎/‎24‎/‎2019 at 8:02 PM, weapon2010 said:

    Why was fire important enough to be in CM1, but chosen to be tactically unimportant and left out of CM2?

    8DkSRle.png

    Boy oh boy oh boy, does this picture bring back memories..

    CM1 must have been one of the nicest games I ever played. (The "Vietcong" games and "Spearhead" are also in my top three.)

    And to be honest? It most probably has given me way more fun and excitement than CMBN/CW/MG/BS together. Not because those games don't satisfy me, no. But because way back then CM1 was a mind blowing experience. Unique. Amazing. Nothing like I'd ever seen.

    I'm desperately waiting for Victory to Rome, which I suspect is very near the release date, and I really hope the campaigns are as playable as the scenarios in Cm1. With or without fire..

  8. There's a very stubborn part in me that keeps on thinking that it should be possible to get a win without too many casualties.

    And I keep on getting frustrated when I lose men or machines. Which unavoidable results in anger and very bad tactical choises with more casualties.

    It is imperative that you realize that the outcome of war/combat is usually more of a numbers game than anything else.

    You can be a Combat Mission Manstein, but still have to accept that there will be slaughterhouse massacers. The gruesome reality dictates that " the last man standing" is the victor.

    In order to achieve local numerical superiority in " Breaking the bank" I transferred all the troops from the right side of the map to the left.

    That made the difference between being butchered, and being butchered but still having men enough to conquer the left side of the map. Maybe this will work for you.

    Recently a collegue that I hadn't met for sometime asked me where my hair had gone.

    Well, I've been playing Combat Mission since the first release and I cannot count the times I pulled my own hair out from the unbearable frustrations that playing Combat Mission ( try the Market Garden module to really get my point) gave to me.

    But.. if you get an unexpected hard fought win, or you plan a brilliant move that turns out as you planned, if you succeed in killing a lot of enemies through good tactics, then Combat Mission is the best game you'll ever play.

     

  9. With Putin possibly poisoning every opponent abroad there's in my mind, a growing chance of some kind of armoured conflict between him and the US/Europe.

    That makes me wonder..

    After the second world war there's been some what of a consensus on the fact that more, relatively cheap, Allied tanks (Shermans mostly) did gain superiority over the relatively small number of better quality tanks of the Germans.

    If history repeats itself, would that mean that a whole lot of Russian modern tanks (T-90, Armata) beat the probably technically better , but less produced, US/Europe tanks?

     

     

  10. 38 minutes ago, Erwin said:

    That would be 90% of the problem. 

    My significant other unit is about your age and is a President and CEO - and she can barely understand or use the basic functions of her "smartphone".  So you are in good company.  :wacko:

    Do you have any 12 year old relatives or neighbors?

    Ehm, nope. But a week or two ago I bought myself a smartphone.

    Expected an all important phone call, was very alert, but when the smartphone finally rang I couldn't connect!

    I did not realise that I had to swipe the green picture of the receiver!

  11. Eeehm.

    After numerous attempts and a PC restart It seems to work now!:o

    Cannot understand why, but well, I'm over fifty-five so that might be the trouble..

    But I would like a more simple activation process. (After a Schwimmwagen, that is.)

  12. Hello everybody,

    After a few years of absence I tried to play again.

    Bought the upgrade 4.0 and everything went the way it should be. I thought..

     

    When I start Black Sea I can see the starting screen with v.200 and game engine 4 noted in the righthand corner.

    But I can't play because the LICENSE ERROR screen tells me that I need version 4 and I should enter the license key in the "new products utility". Did that, and get a "UNLOCK SUCCES" message.

    But when I start the game I get the same License error message.

    Couldn't find a solution in the helpdesk area, so is there somebody that can help me?

    Please?

  13. On ‎3‎-‎9‎-‎2017 at 2:28 AM, Holman said:

    Every release contains a HUGE number of vehicles and units, and every additional module does the same.  In the CMBN line, for instance, I can't think of a single significant vehicle we don't now have for the time period covered.

    Oh, really?

    SCHWIMMWAGEN!

  14. From uncanny good Dutch WW2 site www.strijdbewijs.nl this load-out scheme of first wave OMAHA landing craft. More then 35 years interested in WW2, but I never knew how those landing craft were loaded, until I saw this. Take a look at this:

    http://www.strijdbewijs.nl/omaha/lcvp.htm

     

    Some parts of this site are translated in English, but I'm not sure if this page all ready is. If anyone wants the translation from Dutch, I'll be happy to oblige. 

×
×
  • Create New...