Jump to content

Seedorf81

Members
  • Posts

    940
  • Joined

Posts posted by Seedorf81

  1. Since the Russian army is trying to get every Tom, Dick and Harry to the frontline, they most like scavenged guard-units too. And I bet they thought that this airbase would be a safe place, so security may have been (a lot) less than required.

    I tend to think this airfield-attack was Neptune, but would it be possible that the Ukranian army had it's own version of the WW2 Long Range Desert Group/SAS? That they infiltrated that airfield and blew the place up?

    Probably not, but it would be even more sensational.. 

     

     

  2. Yesterday on Belgian-tv a documentary on the Wagnergroup and their shocking activities in Africa and Syria.

    Two striking quotes from a (former) Wagner-mercenary:

    - "During the Chechen-war the army adopted the following procedure: before an attack, it is absolutely vital to create a 'green' zone" (safe zone). In order to achieve that, you do a complete house-to-house search of that area. If you find any weapon, you kill all the occupants."

    - "What the West doesn't seem to understand, is that our war is not with Ukraine, but with Nato and western values."

    He didn't lie.. Yikes.

     

     

  3. Shocking news: In England there is real commotion, public unrest even, because.. an impatient driver killed three ducklings.

    No joke, that is what people are more angry about than this horrible war with hundreds dying every day!!!

    Sure, I like duckies too, but sometimes I think this whole world is going crazy.

  4. 3 hours ago, MSBoxer said:

    Amen.  I have been skipping most of the posts on the last few pages.

    It surely doesn't look like things are improving..

    Some topics and comments are so heated up that I start to reminisce about John Kettler and his conspiracy-stories. Those were less fanatical than some of the things I read in this thread (multi-multi-multi-topic-thread?) lately.

    I loved reading the amazing news-updates and the very interesting debates and analyses, but things seem to go a little haywire, I fear.

     

  5. 8 minutes ago, Seedorf81 said:

    For me, it is not the monuments, statues or musea or whatever that offend me, it is the fanatical and/or nationalistic people that made them possible.

    A statue of Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Putin, Mao or even George W. Bush don't mean nothing to me, they can put all of them in front of my house and I do not care. (And though my ex-wife was worse to me than all of the forementioned together, even a statue of her wouldn't be a worry to me. 😉)

    It is the people that want to revere and blindly follow murderous leaders that scare the crap out of me.

    Just joined in after a while, reacted before I saw that the monuments-discussion should be over. 

  6. 9 hours ago, Huba said:

    But there's quite a difference between cemetery and monument, don't you think? The example of Hitler statues is actually great here, you wouldn't allow it to stand anywehere, no way, right? Tearing down monuments of your (perceived) opressors is only natural and healthy.

    For me, it is not the monuments, statues or musea or whatever that offend me, it is the fanatical and/or nationalistic people that made them possible.

    A statue of Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Putin, Mao or even George W. Bush don't mean nothing to me, they can put all of them in front of my house and I do not care. (And though my ex-wife was worse to me than all of the forementioned together, even a statue of her wouldn't be a worry to me. 😉)

    It is the people that want to revere and blindly follow murderous leaders that scare the crap out of me.

  7. 5 minutes ago, dan/california said:

     

    Just for reference..

    US ARMY in WW2 lost, from Pearl Harbor until Japanese surrender, nineteen (19) generals through direct enemy fire. Included are one dying in POWcamp, and two missing in action who's cause of death was unknown.

    (A whole lot more died of airplane-crashes, but those were not downed by enemies!)

    Even if you consider changed tactics and weaponry, It makes the Russian General dying-rate unbelievable.

     

  8. WW2 comparisons have been made before, but since Putin's remarks on leaving Mariupol steel plant, "because it doesn't matter", Hitler's speech on victory in Stalingrad - November 8th, 1942 - https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler's_Stalingrad_Speech , keeps nagging me.

    One quote in particular: "And do you know, we're modest: that is, we have it; there are only a couple of very small places left there."

    Of course, sometimes history does not repeat itself, but it would be unbelievable if Putin makes the same mistake on Mariupol as Hitler did on Stalingrad. 

    I know, there doesn't seem to be a chance in hell for the Ukranians to free Mariupol, but it seems to me that in November 1942 the situation for Chuikov and his men was as desperate then, as it is now for the AZOV-guys.

    Wouldn't a new Operation Uranus be a thrill.. 

     

  9. 11 minutes ago, db_zero said:

    Most of the new soldiers are basically kids with a few days of training so fire discipline is probably lax.

    Social media is probably another factor- a tic tok video is worth a lifetime of memories so getting a good video with an AT weapon is gold to many of these internet savvy soldiers.

    To be honest, if I had one of those launchers in my hands, I most likely would like to shoot it. Preferably in a relative safe environment.

  10. On the new Russian commander..

    Suppose, just suppose for argument's sake, that this Alex Dvornikov has Georgi Zhukov-capabilities.

    Could he make a significant difference in the way the Russian army fights?

    (By the way, I suppose it is a well known fact that Zhukov also was a complete ruthless man at times.)  

     

  11. On the topic of ATGM production:

    I wonder if the average Ukranian AT-soldier knows how costly and difficult it is to produce just one Javelin or Nlaw.

    It would be understandable that if they received some Javelins for instance, and see an abandoned Russian tank, Bmp, BTR or even simple fueltruck, that they would like to test out the capability of such a modern toy. And shoot at it. (Boys will always be boys..)

    Could it be that a lot of rounds have been spent on "not so worthy"-targets? Hopefully someone tells 'm there's not an unlimited amount available..

  12. 11 minutes ago, BeondTheGrave said:

    The one thing that you guys are also missing is the real killer. After all dont forget that your aircraft is also burning fuel to bring that fuel in. A lot of it. A jet turbine is probably one of the most fuel inefficient motors out there. And to take off with a full payload, get in country, and land were talking about a big expenditure of fuel just to get the plane out there. A C-17 burns ~20,000lbs/hr in flight. Despite the fact that the Il76 is smaller than the C-17, I guarantee its engines are not proportionately more efficient, which will make these numbers even worse. 20k lbs is ~3k gallons. So on a short jog, say 2 hrs, from the rear air field to the forward air field you'd have to burn ~12% of your payload just to get it there! And of course that assumes a relatively short and uncontested flight, the longer you have to fly or loiter the worse the numbers get. Flying gasoline from one place or another is the single most inefficient method of transportation. Only an idiot would do it unless there was absolutely no*other*way. 

    Goring, Stalingrad winter 1942/1943.

  13. 1 hour ago, Bulletpoint said:

    What conclusions are they making?

    Russian offensive still on target, even with the logistical problems and bigger than expected losses. They, the two experts (for what it's worth, I don't know, one a former lieutenant-colonel?) I saw today, believe that the Russian Army will - "slowly, but surely" overcome the military resistance from the Ukrainian forces.

    They also said that Putin has planning this for years and years, and that there surely are contingency-plans in case of unexpected resistance.

    One statement that doesn't seem far fetched was that the Russians are used to massive casualties and they do not care   about that. Unlike the "Western" countries.

    That's what I made of their comments.

    I do not have the faintest idea if they're better informed than us here.

  14. 1 minute ago, chris talpas said:

    I'm not sure how 'chilled' I would be if I were in Ukraine now rather than in safety in the west.

    Haiduk is in the same horrible predicament, and in all these years on this Forum I've never heard him utter spiteful words or ask him for revenge or show hate.

    He must have the same feelings of bitterness, resentment, horror and yes, maybe an intense hate for the Russians, but he always kept his reactions on this Forum civil.

    Maybe I am too sensitive about the spitefulness of one Forummember, but if that is so, than my admiration for Haiduk grows even greater.

  15. 2 hours ago, Armorgunner said:

    POW´s from Russian paramilitary Police Elite Unit SOBR, of the OMON on TV. Among them a SOBR Lieutenant Colonel!

    High skilled unit, Spetznas style. But detained now 😄 

     

    Very impressive, and I understand that Ukraine is trying to get the reality of this ugly war to the Russian people in this way.

    Unfortunately, this rarely, if ever, works. The US pilots being captured by the North-Vietnamese made similar statements, and we older guys surely remember the downed US-pilots in the first Iraq war, early '90s, who had to appear in front of Saddam Hussein's camera's.

    How truthful the guys in the video may be, the Russians will believe that they were cohersed in saying what the Ukrainians told them to.

    The only result is that these guys will be considered traitors..

     

×
×
  • Create New...