weapon2010

men can still not deploy on flat roofs, did you report it ck3?what good is finding bugs, going to the effort of reporting them , if your not going to fix them?

The BP concept is almost endless in its possibilities, the ability to go in so many unique directions, I would have liked to see a few mastermaps with the new BP.

if the easter bunny shows first Im gonna chop his ears off

never play him again. he is a weasel

Whas it available in this timeframe?

Sometimes the air support says "enroute" but never shows up, is this built in as randomization or a known bug?

I really hope your kidding?

Well I hope a platoon of Panthers would perform much better then Brummbars, they are a far superior tank.Were you playing a human opponent?

Are more vehicle packs planned for 2016?This says battle packs.

what is that?how did I miss that?

in CMFB?or has all been revealed?

then replicate it, and provide some screenshots,better yet a video, so we can all see whats going on

someone please confirm

ok after a 2nd investigation the bug is only with the M4A3(75)W, all other Rhino variants are fine.The strange thing is on the M4A3(75)W only, you can see the forks at about level 7, but then they disappear below that, only being able to see the shadows of them

no its a bug , they randomly disappear in qick battles to

actualy I didn't figure it out , just did a qb in jul 44, picked 2 rhinos, one fork was visible the other was not, its a defeinite bug, but whats causing it?I have no idea

I figured it out, rhinos are not available until jul 1, so whoever made this scenario had an intial date of at least jul1 in the data to select the rhinos, so they selected the rhinos, then at some point the date in the data got changed back to june30 causing the forks to disappear, I just replicated it

That's where you lose credibility with me,losing a company of men is way more then "your" los issues with the game.You may want to brush up on your basic tactics.I too have been playing since 2000, and never had "such a loss of men" due to los. Never, once could I not complete a game due to the LOS mechanics. If this were the case, there would be hundreds of complaints about it, including me, but there are not hundreds of complaints, your blowing this out of proportion,

Nor should it be, nor can it be I agree with that and im sure BF would as well. I can, and so can thousands of others.The positives so far out weight the negatives.Try to find another game on the market with a spotting/los sophistications that this has?You cant.

May I ask how long have you had the game?

you wont get an argument from me in this case that not being able to area fire on that building is an engine limitation,however that doesn't mean enemy within that building wont be suppressed by your unit once spotted, but I still disagree with your original comment ,"Why is spotting and LOS so poorly represented in this?".I truly do not believe that is the case.We forget all the times the los/spotting works as expected.Is it perfect?No.

Its not. It might be your perception of what spotting and LOS should be.I have very few issues.

idk, is choosing the wrong ammo modeled?

what qb map was this played on?

It would be cool to have a level above eilte that would not allow units to area fire at unkown units if they are out of c2.