Dunnee

More addictive than good weed. ..

you're right, the time it takes for the arty to land isn't affected, but I could have sworn that accuracy is effected. . .

ouch

Wasn't Robocop the best killing machine? He racked up like 350 kills in his movies. . .

HUNT. . an old professor of mine gave me the best piece of advice I ever recieved. . KISS: keep it simple stupid. Why micromanage when you can just HUNT. . .

What about Swaziland's army? they fought so valiantly at "stopthemadness" and "****Ineedadrink". . .look it up, you'll all be much better for it. .

i'll tell you a good target for artillery, my neighbor's house. (expletive here) was working on his roof at 8:30 this morning, woke me up with his infernal hammering and I couldn't get back to sleep. What I wouldn't give to see a 150mm shell rip right through that new roof of his. . .

A good commander, Lt. to Btn. co, in CM is worth his weight in gold to an arty spotter. Command bonuses weigh heavily on the spotter's combat capability, time until strike, accuracy, spread of shots, etc. is all affected if you have a commander in C&C of a spotter.

Attrition? would this game just focus on the combat aspects of this, i.e.; kill more of them than they kill of you? Isn't there more to attrition than that? Such as disruption of communications and supply lines, demolishment of the enemies industry and production capability, a basic screwing with the enemies way of life. I thought attrition, in the whole sense, meant destroy your opponents ability to wage war? I mean kill and maim more of his soldiers, but also destroy everything about the enemy that helps his war waging capability. Will this type of thing be modeled? or are you going strictly on a body count?

I'd have to go with any self respecting and moral partisan. . They weren't highly trained, they weren't lavishly equipped, but they were highly motivated by the fact that they were fighting for their homes. Partisans risked exposure and death to disrupt enemy activity in their homelands, they get my vote on the basis of sheer determination and tenacity.

I'd have to go with any self respecting and moral partisan. . They weren't highly trained, they weren't lavishly equipped, but they were highly motivated by the fact that they were fighting for their homes. Partisans risked exposure and death to disrupt enemy activity in their homelands, they get my vote on the basis of sheer determination and tenacity.

I would think a vet that's seen a lot of action may not be perky like your morning java, but he knows what he's doing more so than a highly motivated, raw recruit. Daily occurences in combat would be common to a "low motivation" vet, as a "highly motivated" recruit still pisses his pants when that first 155mm round lands in his position.

see that's what i'm talking about. . Pabst blue ribbon? don't insult me dick. And as for the swearing, maybe i should have put it more succinctly, I have a tendency to allow swear words to slip into my posts, just because out here it slips into a lot of things you say, if you notice this post, I have three posts on this board and I didn't count the curse words, but they are very few and far between, like I said, i'm making a conscious effort to stop. Now, my spelling I would consider excellent, and your explanation was indirectly offensive to me, see terence's remark on "a very smart man. . " And as for the Pabst, this ain't west virginia icehole, this is the tri state, so munch on these

allies are way more cost effective. .

MADMATT KNOWS WHAT I'M TALKIN ABOUT. . i got dibs on the Col. Hammer forum name. . .make it happen matt, please make it happen. [ 04-30-2001: Message edited by: Dunnee ]

how about a Sci fi version. One where the weapons shoot ionized copper discs and the tanks are 170 tonne iridium beasts crewed by two that float on a cushion of air?

sometimes terence old bean. . u NEED to say something particularly nasty, and I wasn't refering to anything i would direct at someone, I just swear a hell of a lot, and I've been pretty good with it on the forum, I was just making the point that we're all big boys and I should be able to swear if I want. But your point is well taken terence, and by the way, u quoted me, did u read the part where I don't need to prove intelligence to anybody? [ 04-30-2001: Message edited by: Dunnee ]

i got your back paton. . I'm irish american after all. ..that whitey ford diss by eminem was hot too. .

damn. . that is some wierd ish. . .

Once when I was really bored, I placed a german battalion on the map, in parade ground formation and had them slowly advance on the US side. The Us forces were a dozen assorted arty spotters, it was pretty fun watchin that battalion get mauled in the open, or maybe i should cut down on the ganji. . .

Madmatt, I understand your point of view as well as the others here, but as for baiting and personal attacks, there's quite a lot of that going on under the auspices of "intelligent" insults. What I'm trying to say is, a lot of people in here abuse the above stated rules but keep it hidden behind the pretext of "cerebral" insult tossing. Maybe it's just me or where i come from, but if I say something particularly nasty, it's not necessarily meant to offend somebody, it's just the way I talk. I'm a smart, capable young man, but I'm also from Jersey, and let me tell you, we have riduculously foul mouths, and I also don't need to prove my intelligence by using big words. All I'm saying is, sometimes verdicts on this forum, as far as banishment and padlocking, seem to be unfair at times. . .PS. i personally think your doing a great job, I would just like to see some of the "cultured" people get in trouble too. .

I've read the agreement, but there's a lot of BS going on in this forum, some people get away with things and others don't? Are we allowed to just chat? or does it have to be about CM all the time? I guess I'll go rehash the "good targets for artillery" question for the 50th time. .

I've read the agreement, but there's a lot of BS going on in this forum, some people get away with things and others don't? Are we allowed to just chat? or does it have to be about CM all the time? I guess I'll go rehash the "good targets for artillery" question for the 50th time. .

let him vent. . .back off

go ahead. . i'll just step on him. . .