Having a mildly serious/ quasi important discussion on the use of 'junior'. A relative claims only the first born can be a 'junior'. I disagree and think that any child, regardless (or irregardless, for the grammatically challenged) of order in the birthing line up, can be a 'junior', if so named (first, middle and last name matching those of the father).
Agree or disagree?
I will google now for the internets version of the truth.