Jump to content

Debate! Who is familiar with Wiesel Mk20?


Recommended Posts

I'm in the middle of a debate re the German 20mm armed Wiesel Mk20. We're looking at the same stats but disagree what they mean. I've got reference that says Wiesel's KuKa turret can rotate 110 degrees either side. I interpret that phrase as being able to fire to the rear but not being able to complete a full rotation, needing to traverse back the way it came to face front. My learned opponent in the debate thinks it means Wiesel can only traverse 55 degrees in either direction (110 total) and cannot fire to the rear at all.

Wiesel's been around for 19 years. Anyone about who has first-hand knowledge of the thing? I'll even take second-hand knowledge! Me, I'm nothin' but a hobby geek. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I took a look at some pictures to see if there are any clues to support 55 degrees to each side.

-There's a radio antenna on the right rear that looks like it would get bent by a 110 degree transverse right.

-Since it seems to use periscope optics for the gun, the gunner would have to rotate with the gun. There seems to be no leg room to either side. It just doesn't seem wide enough for the two man turret crew to rotate 110 degrees with the gun.

So I'd say 55 degrees to either side based on that.

I could be missing something though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found this as well, quoting the book "Waffen-Arsenal - Waffenträger Wiesel 1" by Michael Scheibert:

"...nach beiden Seiten ist die Waffenanlage um jeweils 110º schwenkbar."

Roughly translated "the weapon can be traversed 110 degrees to either side".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in the middle of a debate re the German 20mm armed Wiesel Mk20. We're looking at the same stats but disagree what they mean. I've got reference that says Wiesel's KuKa turret can rotate 110 degrees either side. I interpret that phrase as being able to fire to the rear but not being able to complete a full rotation, needing to traverse back the way it came to face front. My learned opponent in the debate thinks it means Wiesel can only traverse 55 degrees in either direction (110 total) and cannot fire to the rear at all.

Wiesel's been around for 19 years. Anyone about who has first-hand knowledge of the thing? I'll even take second-hand knowledge! Me, I'm nothin' but a hobby geek. :)

I think you need to get out and meet new people, maybe take up pottery or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can only find 110deg left/right. ie total 220deg rotation, which makes sense with the antennae attached at the rear corners.

Anything less would be useless and silly really, 55deg left right is more like the range of a turretless afv like a stug and I don't think Germany has fielded one of those in a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.army-guide.com/eng/product943.html

AWC Wiesel 1 with 20 mm cannon (MK 20 A1)

This was built to meet the requirements of the German Army and is fitted with a one-man KUKA turret E6-II-A1 armed with a 20 mm Rheinmetall MK 20 Rh 202 dual-feed cannon with 160 rounds of ready use ammunition, 60 rounds on the left side and 100 rounds on the right side, allowing the gunner to select the type of ammunition required to engage different targets. The weapon can be elevated from -10 to +45° and traversed 55° left and right. Elevation and traverse are manual and the gunner aims the weapon via a Zeiss PERI-Z-16 periscopic sight; a passive night sight is also available. This has two crew consisting of commander/ gunner and driver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had got my original 110 degree left/right line off a Rhienmetall sales brochure. I'm now coming to think that line was a piece of deliberate obfuscation, trying to mask the vehicle shortcoming's with a badly worded phrase. Like those industry promo photos of M60A1 tanks in the 70s that were deliberately compressed to make the tank appear less tall. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Me, I had started convinced of the 110+110=220 degree rotation thing but am slowly becoming less and less so. Nobody around whose cousin's wife's brother served a stint in the German airborne and actually touched the beast?

Hobby web sites often canabalize the same tainted material. People are still quoting bad Sherman info out of Crow & Icks armor references books from 40 years ago!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...