z1812 Posted March 16, 2008 Share Posted March 16, 2008 Hi All, Among other items the following would be very useful: 1. Better multi-player stability: Currently MP does not work very well. 2. Auto-save in Multiplayer: As there is no save facility when the game crashes it becomes a total waste of time as you cannot re-start. Those are at the top of my list. However wego for MP and a better way to handle PBEM would also be nice. Regards John 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
z1812 Posted March 16, 2008 Share Posted March 16, 2008 Hi All, Among other items the following would be very useful: 1. Better multi-player stability: Currently MP does not work very well. 2. Auto-save in Multiplayer: As there is no save facility when the game crashes it becomes a total waste of time as you cannot re-start. Those are at the top of my list. However wego for MP and a better way to handle PBEM would also be nice. Regards John 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
z1812 Posted March 16, 2008 Share Posted March 16, 2008 Hi All, Among other items the following would be very useful: 1. Better multi-player stability: Currently MP does not work very well. 2. Auto-save in Multiplayer: As there is no save facility when the game crashes it becomes a total waste of time as you cannot re-start. Those are at the top of my list. However wego for MP and a better way to handle PBEM would also be nice. Regards John 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gibsonm Posted March 16, 2008 Share Posted March 16, 2008 Originally posted by c3k: "Target" and "Target Light" using the same color lines. (When a Bradley uses its TOWs it cannot "Target Light". Its "Target" line, red, has the same meaning as a Bradley with TOW's using "Target Light, yellow.) The simple fix is to remove the "Target" option from Bradleys which have no TOW's. Regards, Ken Ken, Its probably clearer if you express it the other way around. When you “Target” with a Bradley it will use TOW (if it has any left). When you “Target Light” with a Bradley it will use 25mm. Or you could just look at the other two threads where you have raised this and have received responses. Red Target Lines and Yellow Target Lines need fixing and Bradley bugs, v1.07 Turning to the broader question, I think you should expect a smaller incremental improvement, in line with a 0.0X update / patch. Some of the other things being suggested here are larger in scope and are probably more likely in a 0.X0 or even X.0 update / patch (maybe included in the USMC module for example). [ March 16, 2008, 08:42 PM: Message edited by: gibsonm ] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gibsonm Posted March 16, 2008 Share Posted March 16, 2008 Originally posted by c3k: "Target" and "Target Light" using the same color lines. (When a Bradley uses its TOWs it cannot "Target Light". Its "Target" line, red, has the same meaning as a Bradley with TOW's using "Target Light, yellow.) The simple fix is to remove the "Target" option from Bradleys which have no TOW's. Regards, Ken Ken, Its probably clearer if you express it the other way around. When you “Target” with a Bradley it will use TOW (if it has any left). When you “Target Light” with a Bradley it will use 25mm. Or you could just look at the other two threads where you have raised this and have received responses. Red Target Lines and Yellow Target Lines need fixing and Bradley bugs, v1.07 Turning to the broader question, I think you should expect a smaller incremental improvement, in line with a 0.0X update / patch. Some of the other things being suggested here are larger in scope and are probably more likely in a 0.X0 or even X.0 update / patch (maybe included in the USMC module for example). [ March 16, 2008, 08:42 PM: Message edited by: gibsonm ] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gibsonm Posted March 16, 2008 Share Posted March 16, 2008 Originally posted by c3k: "Target" and "Target Light" using the same color lines. (When a Bradley uses its TOWs it cannot "Target Light". Its "Target" line, red, has the same meaning as a Bradley with TOW's using "Target Light, yellow.) The simple fix is to remove the "Target" option from Bradleys which have no TOW's. Regards, Ken Ken, Its probably clearer if you express it the other way around. When you “Target” with a Bradley it will use TOW (if it has any left). When you “Target Light” with a Bradley it will use 25mm. Or you could just look at the other two threads where you have raised this and have received responses. Red Target Lines and Yellow Target Lines need fixing and Bradley bugs, v1.07 Turning to the broader question, I think you should expect a smaller incremental improvement, in line with a 0.0X update / patch. Some of the other things being suggested here are larger in scope and are probably more likely in a 0.X0 or even X.0 update / patch (maybe included in the USMC module for example). [ March 16, 2008, 08:42 PM: Message edited by: gibsonm ] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c3k Posted March 17, 2008 Share Posted March 17, 2008 gibsonm, Guilty as charged... (One day I'll figure out how to post links to other threads. There will be much rejoicing when that happens.) To me, there is a slight difference in those threads. But, I grant that they could be rolled up into one. I do not mean to be annoying with the multiple threads, but they do have a short half-life. My intent it to raise what I think are areas where the game could be improved. (Yes, beauty and the eye of the beholder, etc.) Once BF.C comments, then I stop. Steve has mentioned that there are too many threads for him to read every one. You'll note that I raised a few other "issues" in other threads. The moment a BF.C member posts on the thread, whether to support it, be neutral, or to show how useless, silly, inappropriate it would be, I thank them and stop. My intent is to ensure BF.C notes the matter, not to harass them into adopting my worldview. For what it's worth, I take your post, above, in good humor. I appreciate the feedback, and I acknowledge your role as a beta tester. Thanks for the post. Regards, Ken 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c3k Posted March 17, 2008 Share Posted March 17, 2008 gibsonm, Guilty as charged... (One day I'll figure out how to post links to other threads. There will be much rejoicing when that happens.) To me, there is a slight difference in those threads. But, I grant that they could be rolled up into one. I do not mean to be annoying with the multiple threads, but they do have a short half-life. My intent it to raise what I think are areas where the game could be improved. (Yes, beauty and the eye of the beholder, etc.) Once BF.C comments, then I stop. Steve has mentioned that there are too many threads for him to read every one. You'll note that I raised a few other "issues" in other threads. The moment a BF.C member posts on the thread, whether to support it, be neutral, or to show how useless, silly, inappropriate it would be, I thank them and stop. My intent is to ensure BF.C notes the matter, not to harass them into adopting my worldview. For what it's worth, I take your post, above, in good humor. I appreciate the feedback, and I acknowledge your role as a beta tester. Thanks for the post. Regards, Ken 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c3k Posted March 17, 2008 Share Posted March 17, 2008 gibsonm, Guilty as charged... (One day I'll figure out how to post links to other threads. There will be much rejoicing when that happens.) To me, there is a slight difference in those threads. But, I grant that they could be rolled up into one. I do not mean to be annoying with the multiple threads, but they do have a short half-life. My intent it to raise what I think are areas where the game could be improved. (Yes, beauty and the eye of the beholder, etc.) Once BF.C comments, then I stop. Steve has mentioned that there are too many threads for him to read every one. You'll note that I raised a few other "issues" in other threads. The moment a BF.C member posts on the thread, whether to support it, be neutral, or to show how useless, silly, inappropriate it would be, I thank them and stop. My intent is to ensure BF.C notes the matter, not to harass them into adopting my worldview. For what it's worth, I take your post, above, in good humor. I appreciate the feedback, and I acknowledge your role as a beta tester. Thanks for the post. Regards, Ken 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aquablue Posted March 17, 2008 Share Posted March 17, 2008 AI getting burger & chips for me 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aquablue Posted March 17, 2008 Share Posted March 17, 2008 AI getting burger & chips for me 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aquablue Posted March 17, 2008 Share Posted March 17, 2008 AI getting burger & chips for me 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neepster Posted March 17, 2008 Share Posted March 17, 2008 -Arty delivered smoke! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neepster Posted March 17, 2008 Share Posted March 17, 2008 -Arty delivered smoke! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neepster Posted March 17, 2008 Share Posted March 17, 2008 -Arty delivered smoke! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Childress Posted March 17, 2008 Share Posted March 17, 2008 Modest wish: replacing the micro type in the briefings with a larger font. Also, a key for deleting scenarios. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Childress Posted March 17, 2008 Share Posted March 17, 2008 Modest wish: replacing the micro type in the briefings with a larger font. Also, a key for deleting scenarios. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Childress Posted March 17, 2008 Share Posted March 17, 2008 Modest wish: replacing the micro type in the briefings with a larger font. Also, a key for deleting scenarios. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Law&Order Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 In game "file" manager, to get rid of unwanted/bad scenarios, make them tag-able to select good mp ones, or instant action, or large etc etc. Ammo sharing, still have squads next to each other, one twiddling thumbs without ammo, the other engaging the enemy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Law&Order Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 In game "file" manager, to get rid of unwanted/bad scenarios, make them tag-able to select good mp ones, or instant action, or large etc etc. Ammo sharing, still have squads next to each other, one twiddling thumbs without ammo, the other engaging the enemy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Law&Order Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 In game "file" manager, to get rid of unwanted/bad scenarios, make them tag-able to select good mp ones, or instant action, or large etc etc. Ammo sharing, still have squads next to each other, one twiddling thumbs without ammo, the other engaging the enemy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c3k Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 Hmmm, Scenario file manager? I believe a search under "c3k" will reveal some thoughts on that matter... Thanks, Ken 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c3k Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 Hmmm, Scenario file manager? I believe a search under "c3k" will reveal some thoughts on that matter... Thanks, Ken 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c3k Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 Hmmm, Scenario file manager? I believe a search under "c3k" will reveal some thoughts on that matter... Thanks, Ken 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aquablue Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 yes, a key for deleting saved games. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.