WWB Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 The title pretty much says it all. There are now 56 more AARs at Boots and Tracks. Enjoy. WWB 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingfish Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 ...quietly e-mails wyatt another 200 AARs... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seanachai Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 grumbles...I can't be having with all this capitalization and exclamation points enough to make any sane person check to see if their zipper was open. Seems to me that the buggers at Boots and Tracks should just have to post like the rest of us, without all this grandstanding, shouting, and prancing about like a lot of Corporate whores who've got the price of some lame Advertising Agency tucked into their pants. I'm a patient man, the gods know I am, but I don't know why I should be subjected to the Forum equivalent of a 'spittle and urine' spray from some bugger just because they're the Forum equivalent of the Waffen SS or the Queen's Own, or somefink. If we started every fecking Peng Challenge Thread with capitalization and enough exclamation points to qualify for 'the Queen's Own Light Tossers and Mental Deficients', we'd have had to pack our tents and disappear into the Canadian North long ago... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenAsJade Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 The "Things" AAR posted under my name is the version that the review panel rejected as "too short to score points". I subsequently submitted a revamped version ... any chance of having that appear at B&T instead of the reject? GaJ. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonS Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 Oh, I don't know. That one has a certain charm to it 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenAsJade Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 Heh - honest & to the point, eh? But since I was asked and went to the trouble of describing the plan and the battle in more detail, you might as well be able to capitalise on that and laugh at my exploits in more detail.... [ July 15, 2004, 06:19 AM: Message edited by: GreenAsJade ] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holien Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 Hi, WWB still has to pick up a whole bunch of AAR's from me and I am not sure why that one has been posted. I will double check my files tonight to ensure that I did not put it out. Which is possible. If this is the case I apologise. If it is not the case We will apologise. Either way your proper AAR will be displayed. I hope that is OK GAJ and we should sort it as soon as possible. I am at work at the moment more in a few hours. I hope people can live with a few cock ups as there are so many AAR's that some will fall between the cracks. If we had no internet this would not be possible. H 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWB Posted July 15, 2004 Author Share Posted July 15, 2004 Originally posted by GreenAsJade: The "Things" AAR posted under my name is the version that the review panel rejected as "too short to score points". I subsequently submitted a revamped version ... any chance of having that appear at B&T instead of the reject? GaJ. Email the corrected version and I can post. As Holien said, I am working of some large collected files and I am working fast, so old versions of things might slip in. Sensai, we are members of the 'the Queen's Own Light Tossers and Mental Deficients'. I like capitalization. CAPITALIZATION RULZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WWB 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holien Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 GAJ I have now sent WWB what I have as the latest AAR. Sorry about this. H 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hensworth Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 My AAR for Retreat from Metemma is attributed to my opponent Breakthrough. No big deal, just mentioning it. [ July 15, 2004, 05:39 PM: Message edited by: Sgt_Kelly ] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Dorosh Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 Originally posted by Seanachai: grumbles...I can't be having with all this capitalization and exclamation points enough to make any sane person check to see if their zipper was open. Seems to me that the buggers at Boots and Tracks should just have to post like the rest of us, without all this grandstanding, shouting, and prancing about like a lot of Corporate whores who've got the price of some lame Advertising Agency tucked into their pants. I'm a patient man, the gods know I am, but I don't know why I should be subjected to the Forum equivalent of a 'spittle and urine' spray from some bugger just because they're the Forum equivalent of the Waffen SS or the Queen's Own, or somefink. If we started every fecking Peng Challenge Thread with capitalization and enough exclamation points to qualify for 'the Queen's Own Light Tossers and Mental Deficients', we'd have had to pack our tents and disappear into the Canadian North long ago... Yes, I've commented before how utterly juvenile those subject headings are. If wasn't for Seanachai presence here I wouldn't have boethered to even open this thread, much less read any of it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holien Posted July 16, 2004 Share Posted July 16, 2004 Originally posted by Sgt_Kelly: My AAR for Retreat from Metemma is attributed to my opponent Breakthrough. No big deal, just mentioning it. Hi this has happened because of the way the header info was set up on the AAR. I did ask for it to name opponent etc... Just looking at the header info it scans as if Breakthrough is the lead player. This one slipped through the net as I should have sent it back to you to re-set the header. Sorry and I hope that WWB can re-name it. I have an Idea that might help WWB and will discuss this tonight when I get home from work. Please also bear in mind I am not blessed with Cable and have a poor ISDN line.... So getting files to WWB has yet to be perfected. Cheers H 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenAsJade Posted July 16, 2004 Share Posted July 16, 2004 Originally posted by Holien: GAJ I have now sent WWB what I have as the latest AAR. Sorry about this. H Hey - no worries! Now people have had a chance to read _both_ AARs I submitted for "Things" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenAsJade Posted July 16, 2004 Share Posted July 16, 2004 Why don't you whinging bastards go and take out your capital letter pedantry on a thread where people aren't actually putting in real time & money to support the CM community. If it's supposed to be funny, it's not. GaJ. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWB Posted July 16, 2004 Author Share Posted July 16, 2004 Originally posted by Michael Dorosh: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Seanachai: grumbles...I can't be having with all this capitalization and exclamation points enough to make any sane person check to see if their zipper was open. Seems to me that the buggers at Boots and Tracks should just have to post like the rest of us, without all this grandstanding, shouting, and prancing about like a lot of Corporate whores who've got the price of some lame Advertising Agency tucked into their pants. I'm a patient man, the gods know I am, but I don't know why I should be subjected to the Forum equivalent of a 'spittle and urine' spray from some bugger just because they're the Forum equivalent of the Waffen SS or the Queen's Own, or somefink. If we started every fecking Peng Challenge Thread with capitalization and enough exclamation points to qualify for 'the Queen's Own Light Tossers and Mental Deficients', we'd have had to pack our tents and disappear into the Canadian North long ago... Yes, I've commented before how utterly juvenile those subject headings are. If wasn't for Seanachai presence here I wouldn't have boethered to even open this thread, much less read any of it. </font> 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Kettler Posted July 17, 2004 Share Posted July 17, 2004 How, oh how are the troops ever supposed to learn what not to do in Retreat from Metemma without access to my sterling example? On a more serious note, I am looking forward to seeing my AARs appear in due course, bearing in mind the huge numbers of AARs submitted. Regards, John Kettler 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanonier Reichmann Posted July 17, 2004 Share Posted July 17, 2004 So am I John. I hope they live up to the high standards you set in the original ROW! Regards Jim R. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seanachai Posted July 18, 2004 Share Posted July 18, 2004 Originally posted by WWB: Logic: how would you know if Senachai is in this thread without opening it? WWB I'm watched everywhere I go. They're always watching me. They're not going to get my string, though! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brent Pollock Posted July 18, 2004 Share Posted July 18, 2004 Anyone else having a Windows Explorer jam-up anytime they've just viewed one of the AARs? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xerxes Posted July 18, 2004 Share Posted July 18, 2004 I've had problems with acrobat reader freezing. You just have to kill the process and load it again. BTW, I really enjoyed reading all the AARs for my scenario. Thanks! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.