Jump to content

Real firing tests with CMBN weapons


Recommended Posts

Apocal - if at anything like a front line, pre-emptive - if a platoon of infantry were going to enter a field not previously held, then the opposite "treeline" was going to get plastered before anyone step into the open. Anything else could mean a dead platoon.

They might send 2 scouts if they didn't think they were yet in contact with the enemy, just empty no man's land. They wouldn't risk a platoon. But they weren't going to recon by death at 2 men a field in places actually held.

Thank you.

So I would have to say the MG34/42 did a better job if you go by the film. I liked how they gave the M3 grease gun high marks...pure rot.

Did you honestly expect them to say, "this new gun sucks"?

Also: totally an off-topic remark for this thread, but anyone else annoyed there aren't cellars in CMBN? I keep eating **** during preliminary bombardments when defending, when I should be able to keep most of my troops relatively safe and only come up to actively defend once the shells stopped landing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also: totally an off-topic remark for this thread, but anyone else annoyed there aren't cellars in CMBN? I keep eating **** during preliminary bombardments when defending, when I should be able to keep most of my troops relatively safe and only come up to actively defend once the shells stopped landing.

+1

(10 +1s)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you.

Did you honestly expect them to say, "this new gun sucks"?

Also: totally an off-topic remark for this thread, but anyone else annoyed there aren't cellars in CMBN? I keep eating **** during preliminary bombardments when defending, when I should be able to keep most of my troops relatively safe and only come up to actively defend once the shells stopped landing.

Broadsword did actually try creating them in CMBN by sinking a building. So far they have worked pretty darn well, but graphically they don't look great. In CMFI the ground shaping works a litle differently. It should look more appealing, but not sure how it will work yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...